Ethical, methodological, and translational framework for animal studies in physical exercise research.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Ricardo A Pinho, Larissa C Marques, Lei Zhou, Luis F Marqueze, Paulo C L Silveira, Alexandra Latini, Rolando B Ceddia, Zsolt Radak, Scott K Powers
{"title":"Ethical, methodological, and translational framework for animal studies in physical exercise research.","authors":"Ricardo A Pinho, Larissa C Marques, Lei Zhou, Luis F Marqueze, Paulo C L Silveira, Alexandra Latini, Rolando B Ceddia, Zsolt Radak, Scott K Powers","doi":"10.1007/s00421-026-06490-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experimental research involving physical exercise (PE) in animal models has contributed significantly to advancing knowledge in several areas, including physiology, biochemistry, and translational medicine. Despite the widespread use of these models, important concerns remain regarding methodological heterogeneity, limited experimental standardization, reproducibility of findings, and the translational validity of preclinical outcomes. In this context, the present article proposes an integrated decision-making framework for animal-based PE research. The framework complements existing guidelines linking ethical justification, animal welfare, experimental design, exercise prescription, and translational interpretation throughout the different stages of study development. The manuscript is based on international guidelines for animal experimentation, including ARRIVE 2.0, PREPARE, the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, AVMA recommendations, the APS Resource Book for the Design of Animal Exercise Protocols, and recent methodological recommendations for preclinical exercise research in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. The topics address aspects related to ethical decision-making in the use of animal models, the principles of the 3Rs, selection of species, strain, sex, and age, sample size calculation, inclusion and exclusion criteria, translational validity, and the definition of exercise protocols, including intensity, frequency, duration, equipment, and experimental monitoring. This framework is intended to support more consistent experimental decisions, including selection, justification, and implementation, according to the research question, animal model, and intended translational inference.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-026-06490-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experimental research involving physical exercise (PE) in animal models has contributed significantly to advancing knowledge in several areas, including physiology, biochemistry, and translational medicine. Despite the widespread use of these models, important concerns remain regarding methodological heterogeneity, limited experimental standardization, reproducibility of findings, and the translational validity of preclinical outcomes. In this context, the present article proposes an integrated decision-making framework for animal-based PE research. The framework complements existing guidelines linking ethical justification, animal welfare, experimental design, exercise prescription, and translational interpretation throughout the different stages of study development. The manuscript is based on international guidelines for animal experimentation, including ARRIVE 2.0, PREPARE, the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, AVMA recommendations, the APS Resource Book for the Design of Animal Exercise Protocols, and recent methodological recommendations for preclinical exercise research in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. The topics address aspects related to ethical decision-making in the use of animal models, the principles of the 3Rs, selection of species, strain, sex, and age, sample size calculation, inclusion and exclusion criteria, translational validity, and the definition of exercise protocols, including intensity, frequency, duration, equipment, and experimental monitoring. This framework is intended to support more consistent experimental decisions, including selection, justification, and implementation, according to the research question, animal model, and intended translational inference.

体育运动研究中动物研究的伦理、方法和转化框架。
动物模型中涉及体育锻炼(PE)的实验研究对生理学、生物化学和转化医学等多个领域的知识进步做出了重大贡献。尽管这些模型被广泛使用,但重要的问题仍然是方法学的异质性、有限的实验标准化、结果的可重复性以及临床前结果的转化有效性。在此背景下,本文提出了一个基于动物的体育研究的综合决策框架。该框架补充了现有的指导原则,将伦理论证、动物福利、实验设计、运动处方和贯穿研究发展不同阶段的翻译解释联系起来。该手稿基于国际动物实验指南,包括ARRIVE 2.0, PREPARE,实验动物护理和使用指南,AVMA建议,APS动物运动方案设计资源书,以及最近关于代谢和心血管疾病临床前运动研究的方法建议。这些主题涉及动物模型使用中的伦理决策、3r原则、物种、品系、性别和年龄的选择、样本量计算、纳入和排除标准、转化有效性以及运动方案的定义,包括强度、频率、持续时间、设备和实验监测。该框架旨在支持更一致的实验决策,包括根据研究问题、动物模型和预期的翻译推断进行选择、论证和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书