Plant‐ and Microbial‐Derived Soil Organic Carbon: Global Patterns and Divergent Climatic Associations

IF 12.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jiayuan Wang, Xuefeng Xie, Xingwen Lin, Lijie Pu, Lingyue Zhu, Yan Li, Tao Wu, Zhenyi Jia, Shuntao Chen, Armindo H. Cambule
{"title":"Plant‐ and Microbial‐Derived Soil Organic Carbon: Global Patterns and Divergent Climatic Associations","authors":"Jiayuan Wang, Xuefeng Xie, Xingwen Lin, Lijie Pu, Lingyue Zhu, Yan Li, Tao Wu, Zhenyi Jia, Shuntao Chen, Armindo H. Cambule","doi":"10.1111/gcb.71174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil organic carbon (SOC) pools reflect the net balance of plant‐ and microbial‐derived inputs, transformation, and loss, yet a global‐scale assessment of distribution patterns, relative contributions, and hierarchical environmental correlates of microbial necromass carbon (MNC) and plant‐derived carbon (PdC) remains incomplete. Based on 1167 site‐level observations (1235 pool‐level records) across four ecosystem types, we applied variance partitioning, random forest, linear mixed‐effects models, and structural equation modeling to quantify global patterns and associative pathways of the two carbon pools. Unadjusted pooled comparisons showed higher MNC concentration and SOC contribution than PdC. However, covariate‐adjusted linear mixed‐effects models revealed significantly higher PdC. Paired observations showed the same directional trend, although statistical significance was not reached due to limited paired sample size (concentration: <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.104; contribution: <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.140). The apparent MNC dominance constitutes a Simpson's paradox driven by uneven ecosystem sampling, rather than a consistent within‐ecosystem pattern. Instead, the relative contribution of MNC and PdC was ecosystem‐dependent: MNC was marginally higher in forests, whereas PdC dominated in croplands and wetlands, with no significant difference in grasslands in paired observations. Edaphic variables were the strongest predictors (independent explanatory power: 61.1% for MNC, 47.4% for PdC), with total nitrogen, C:N ratio, pH, and mean annual temperature as key correlates. Our results reveal a hierarchical associative cascade in which geographic factors covary with climate, which in turn correlates with edaphic properties as the strongest direct predictors. Climate shows a weak but significant negative direct association with MNC only. This synthesis provides a hierarchical correlative framework and biome‐specific baseline parameters to support explicit representation of plant‐ and microbial‐mediated SOC pathways in Earth system models.","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.71174","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) pools reflect the net balance of plant‐ and microbial‐derived inputs, transformation, and loss, yet a global‐scale assessment of distribution patterns, relative contributions, and hierarchical environmental correlates of microbial necromass carbon (MNC) and plant‐derived carbon (PdC) remains incomplete. Based on 1167 site‐level observations (1235 pool‐level records) across four ecosystem types, we applied variance partitioning, random forest, linear mixed‐effects models, and structural equation modeling to quantify global patterns and associative pathways of the two carbon pools. Unadjusted pooled comparisons showed higher MNC concentration and SOC contribution than PdC. However, covariate‐adjusted linear mixed‐effects models revealed significantly higher PdC. Paired observations showed the same directional trend, although statistical significance was not reached due to limited paired sample size (concentration: p = 0.104; contribution: p = 0.140). The apparent MNC dominance constitutes a Simpson's paradox driven by uneven ecosystem sampling, rather than a consistent within‐ecosystem pattern. Instead, the relative contribution of MNC and PdC was ecosystem‐dependent: MNC was marginally higher in forests, whereas PdC dominated in croplands and wetlands, with no significant difference in grasslands in paired observations. Edaphic variables were the strongest predictors (independent explanatory power: 61.1% for MNC, 47.4% for PdC), with total nitrogen, C:N ratio, pH, and mean annual temperature as key correlates. Our results reveal a hierarchical associative cascade in which geographic factors covary with climate, which in turn correlates with edaphic properties as the strongest direct predictors. Climate shows a weak but significant negative direct association with MNC only. This synthesis provides a hierarchical correlative framework and biome‐specific baseline parameters to support explicit representation of plant‐ and microbial‐mediated SOC pathways in Earth system models.
植物和微生物来源的土壤有机碳:全球模式和不同的气候关联
土壤有机碳(SOC)库反映了植物和微生物来源的输入、转化和损失的净平衡,但全球范围内微生物坏死碳(MNC)和植物来源碳(PdC)的分布模式、相对贡献和等级环境相关性的评估仍然不完整。基于四种生态系统类型的1167个站点级观测数据(1235个库级记录),我们应用方差划分、随机森林、线性混合效应模型和结构方程模型来量化两个碳库的全球模式和关联途径。未经调整的汇总比较显示,MNC浓度和SOC贡献高于PdC。然而,协变量调整后的线性混合效应模型显示出显著更高的PdC。配对观察结果显示出相同的方向趋势,但由于配对样本量有限(浓度:p = 0.104;贡献:p = 0.140),未达到统计学显著性。跨国公司的明显优势构成了由不均匀的生态系统采样驱动的辛普森悖论,而不是生态系统内部的一致模式。相反,MNC和PdC的相对贡献依赖于生态系统:在成对观测中,MNC在森林中略高,而PdC在农田和湿地中占主导地位,在草地中无显著差异。土壤变量是最强的预测因子(独立解释力:MNC为61.1%,PdC为47.4%),全氮、碳氮比、pH和年平均温度是主要相关因子。我们的研究结果揭示了一个层次关联级联,其中地理因子与气候共变,而气候又与土壤特性相关,是最强的直接预测因子。气候仅与跨国公司表现出微弱但显著的负相关直接关系。该综合提供了一个层次相关框架和生物群系特异性基线参数,以支持在地球系统模型中明确表示植物和微生物介导的有机碳途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书