Feeding decisions in advanced dementia: beliefs of caregivers and nursing technicians in a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Laura Rossi da Motta, Beatriz Passinho Heinle, Carollyna Scherer Brum, Kelly Carvalho Silveira Gonçalves
{"title":"Feeding decisions in advanced dementia: beliefs of caregivers and nursing technicians in a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Laura Rossi da Motta, Beatriz Passinho Heinle, Carollyna Scherer Brum, Kelly Carvalho Silveira Gonçalves","doi":"10.1016/j.gerinurse.2026.104395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the beliefs and perceptions of caregivers regarding feeding management in patients with advanced dementia at one of the largest female long-term care institution in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational, cross-sectional, exploratory study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire applied to caregivers and nursing technicians working at the institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among respondents, 78.7% believed that nasogastric tube feeding was the only therapeutic option for nutrition. Additionally, 70.2% considered oral comfort feeding to be an intervention that hastens death, and 85.1% believed that the absence of artificial nutrition would inevitably lead to death. Furthermore, 51.1% agreed that artificial feeding reduces the risk of aspiration, pressure injuries, and hospitalizations, as well as providing comfort and prolonging life, despite the lack of supporting evidence in the scientific literature. Notably, 66% of participants reported having received prior training on feeding management in advanced dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight inconsistencies between the perceptions of caregivers and nursing technicians and evidence-based practices regarding feeding in advanced dementia. There is a clear need for targeted education and continuous training programs to promote informed decision-making and support evidence-informed care for this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":56258,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Nursing","volume":"74 Pt B","pages":"104395"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2026.104395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the beliefs and perceptions of caregivers regarding feeding management in patients with advanced dementia at one of the largest female long-term care institution in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Methods: An observational, cross-sectional, exploratory study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire applied to caregivers and nursing technicians working at the institution.

Results: Among respondents, 78.7% believed that nasogastric tube feeding was the only therapeutic option for nutrition. Additionally, 70.2% considered oral comfort feeding to be an intervention that hastens death, and 85.1% believed that the absence of artificial nutrition would inevitably lead to death. Furthermore, 51.1% agreed that artificial feeding reduces the risk of aspiration, pressure injuries, and hospitalizations, as well as providing comfort and prolonging life, despite the lack of supporting evidence in the scientific literature. Notably, 66% of participants reported having received prior training on feeding management in advanced dementia.

Conclusion: These findings highlight inconsistencies between the perceptions of caregivers and nursing technicians and evidence-based practices regarding feeding in advanced dementia. There is a clear need for targeted education and continuous training programs to promote informed decision-making and support evidence-informed care for this vulnerable population.

晚期痴呆患者的喂养决定:一项横断面研究中护理人员和护理技术人员的信念。
目的:评估巴西巴西大德州最大的女性长期护理机构之一的护理人员对晚期痴呆患者喂养管理的看法和看法。方法:采用自填问卷对在该机构工作的护理人员和护理技术人员进行观察性、横断面、探索性研究。结果:78.7%的受访者认为鼻胃管喂养是唯一的营养治疗选择。此外,70.2%的人认为口服舒适喂养是一种加速死亡的干预措施,85.1%的人认为缺乏人工营养将不可避免地导致死亡。此外,尽管缺乏科学文献的支持证据,但51.1%的人同意人工喂养可以降低误吸、压伤和住院的风险,并提供舒适和延长生命。值得注意的是,66%的参与者报告说他们之前接受过关于晚期痴呆症喂养管理的培训。结论:这些发现突出了护理人员和护理技术人员对晚期痴呆症喂养的看法与循证实践之间的不一致。显然需要有针对性的教育和持续的培训计划,以促进知情决策,并支持对这一弱势群体的循证护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatric Nursing
Geriatric Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
257
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Nursing is a comprehensive source for clinical information and management advice relating to the care of older adults. The journal''s peer-reviewed articles report the latest developments in the management of acute and chronic disorders and provide practical advice on care of older adults across the long term continuum. Geriatric Nursing addresses current issues related to drugs, advance directives, staff development and management, legal issues, client and caregiver education, infection control, and other topics. The journal is written specifically for nurses and nurse practitioners who work with older adults in any care setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书