A comprehensive review of mixed-species biofilm infections and innovative therapeutic strategies.

IF 3.2 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Mohsen Nazari, Romina Kardan, Amjad Ahmadi, Fatemeh Sadat Abolhasani, Jaber Hemmati
{"title":"A comprehensive review of mixed-species biofilm infections and innovative therapeutic strategies.","authors":"Mohsen Nazari, Romina Kardan, Amjad Ahmadi, Fatemeh Sadat Abolhasani, Jaber Hemmati","doi":"10.1007/s11033-026-12907-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mixed-species biofilm infections are important causes of persistent and difficult-to-treat infections. Compared with monospecies biofilms, mixed-species communities contain microorganisms with different physiological and genetic characteristics that interact through metabolic cooperation, chemical signaling, competition, and modification of the local environment. These interactions, together with the EPS matrix, physiological heterogeneity, and HGT, can increase antimicrobial tolerance, contributing to treatment failure and infection recurrence. Polymicrobial biofilms are associated with chronic wounds, respiratory infections, catheter- and device-associated infections, and other persistent infections. However, treatment of polymicrobial biofilms remains challenging because their complex structure and interspecies interactions can reduce antimicrobial efficacy. This review summarizes the clinical significance, formation, and persistence of mixed-species biofilms and discusses recent therapeutic strategies for their control. We also discuss recent approaches for controlling polymicrobial biofilms, including natural compounds, QS inhibition, CRISPR-Cas-based approaches, biofilm matrix targeting, metabolic and nutrient disruption, nanotechnology, and phage therapy. Recent studies show that these approaches can inhibit biofilm formation, disrupt established biofilms, enhance antimicrobial activity, and selectively target specific microbial populations. However, their effectiveness varies with microbial composition, biofilm maturity, matrix characteristics, and treatment conditions. Overall, current evidence supports the development of targeted and combination-based strategies for mixed-species biofilms. Further studies using clinically relevant models are needed to exactly define treatment efficacy and support the translation of these approaches into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18755,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Biology Reports","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Biology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-026-12907-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mixed-species biofilm infections are important causes of persistent and difficult-to-treat infections. Compared with monospecies biofilms, mixed-species communities contain microorganisms with different physiological and genetic characteristics that interact through metabolic cooperation, chemical signaling, competition, and modification of the local environment. These interactions, together with the EPS matrix, physiological heterogeneity, and HGT, can increase antimicrobial tolerance, contributing to treatment failure and infection recurrence. Polymicrobial biofilms are associated with chronic wounds, respiratory infections, catheter- and device-associated infections, and other persistent infections. However, treatment of polymicrobial biofilms remains challenging because their complex structure and interspecies interactions can reduce antimicrobial efficacy. This review summarizes the clinical significance, formation, and persistence of mixed-species biofilms and discusses recent therapeutic strategies for their control. We also discuss recent approaches for controlling polymicrobial biofilms, including natural compounds, QS inhibition, CRISPR-Cas-based approaches, biofilm matrix targeting, metabolic and nutrient disruption, nanotechnology, and phage therapy. Recent studies show that these approaches can inhibit biofilm formation, disrupt established biofilms, enhance antimicrobial activity, and selectively target specific microbial populations. However, their effectiveness varies with microbial composition, biofilm maturity, matrix characteristics, and treatment conditions. Overall, current evidence supports the development of targeted and combination-based strategies for mixed-species biofilms. Further studies using clinically relevant models are needed to exactly define treatment efficacy and support the translation of these approaches into clinical practice.

混合物种生物膜感染和创新治疗策略的综合综述。
混合物种生物膜感染是持续性和难治性感染的重要原因。与单物种生物膜相比,混合物种群落包含具有不同生理和遗传特征的微生物,这些微生物通过代谢合作、化学信号、竞争和局部环境的修饰来相互作用。这些相互作用,加上EPS基质、生理异质性和HGT,可增加抗微生物药物耐受性,导致治疗失败和感染复发。多微生物生物膜与慢性伤口、呼吸道感染、导管和器械相关感染以及其他持续性感染有关。然而,多微生物生物膜的处理仍然具有挑战性,因为它们的复杂结构和种间相互作用会降低抗菌效果。本文综述了混合物种生物膜的临床意义、形成和持久性,并讨论了最近的治疗策略。我们还讨论了控制多微生物生物膜的最新方法,包括天然化合物、QS抑制、基于crispr - cas的方法、生物膜基质靶向、代谢和营养破坏、纳米技术和噬菌体治疗。最近的研究表明,这些方法可以抑制生物膜的形成,破坏已建立的生物膜,增强抗菌活性,并选择性地针对特定的微生物种群。然而,它们的有效性因微生物组成、生物膜成熟度、基质特性和处理条件而异。总的来说,目前的证据支持开发针对混合物种生物膜的靶向和基于组合的策略。需要使用临床相关模型的进一步研究来准确定义治疗效果,并支持这些方法转化为临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Biology Reports
Molecular Biology Reports 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1048
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Biology Reports publishes original research papers and review articles that demonstrate novel molecular and cellular findings in both eukaryotes (animals, plants, algae, funghi) and prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea).The journal publishes results of both fundamental and translational research as well as new techniques that advance experimental progress in the field and presents original research papers, short communications and (mini-) reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书