Implementing Image-Guided Brachytherapy (IGBT) For Cervical Cancer in Resource-Limited Settings: An International Multicentric Cross-Sectional Study of Resource and Workflow Impact.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Varsha Hande, Sandra Ndarukwa, Alfredo Polo Rubio, Daniel Berger, Yavuz Anacak, Maria Sucharski, Jerickson Abbie S Flores, Jai Prakash Agarwal, Susan Chitonje Msadabwe, Eugenia Gamboa, Julius David Mwaiselage, Enkhtsetseg Vanchinbazar, El Majjaoui Sanaa, Chynara Batyrkanova, Amira Shami, Senem Alanyali, Nigar Aliyeva Sabaddin, Vladyslav Sukhin, Blanka Jaksic, Tomoaki Tamaki, Supriya Chopra
{"title":"Implementing Image-Guided Brachytherapy (IGBT) For Cervical Cancer in Resource-Limited Settings: An International Multicentric Cross-Sectional Study of Resource and Workflow Impact.","authors":"Varsha Hande, Sandra Ndarukwa, Alfredo Polo Rubio, Daniel Berger, Yavuz Anacak, Maria Sucharski, Jerickson Abbie S Flores, Jai Prakash Agarwal, Susan Chitonje Msadabwe, Eugenia Gamboa, Julius David Mwaiselage, Enkhtsetseg Vanchinbazar, El Majjaoui Sanaa, Chynara Batyrkanova, Amira Shami, Senem Alanyali, Nigar Aliyeva Sabaddin, Vladyslav Sukhin, Blanka Jaksic, Tomoaki Tamaki, Supriya Chopra","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2026.10.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) in cervical cancer improves patient outcomes. However, implementation in resource-limited settings is challenging due to limited capacity upscale, absence of workflow enhancement strategies, and financial barriers. Optimizing workflows is essential, yet the relationship between workflow efficiency and IGBT uptake remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study examined brachytherapy (BT) workflows across 14 nationally representative centers. Standardized forms collected data on infrastructure, treatment workflows ((A): Conventional two-dimensional (2D) X-Ray-Guided BT, with point-A-based fractions planned using 2D X-ray imaging, (B): Standard intracavitary (IC) three-dimensional (3D) IGBT, with fractions planned using computed tomography (CT)- or magnetic resonance (MR)-based imaging with volume-based prescriptions, (C): Advanced 3D IGBT, with fractions delivered using advanced IC or intracavitary-interstitial (IC-IS) techniques and planned using CT- or MR-based imaging with volume-based prescriptions.)), procedural times, anesthesia, imaging, and treatment planning. National BT resource data was also collected. Recommendations were developed to optimize workflows and facilitate IGBT transition.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 365 workflows were analyzed, wherein workflow B was most common (51%). Median procedure times were 2 hours 08 minutes (Interquartile range (IQR) 1 hour and 7 minutes), 2 hours 35 minutes (IQR 1 hour and 51 minutes), and 4 hours 16 minutes (IQR 2 hours and 33 minutes) for workflows A, B, and C, respectively. Using sedation instead of full anesthesia shortened workflows by a median of 35 minutes. BT machine demand, based on national cervical cancer incidence, ranged from 0.2 to 9.5; four countries had low (< 0.5), two moderate (0.5 - 1.0), and eight high demand (>1.0). Resource- and context-specific recommendations for IGBT transition were provided.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>BT workflows varied widely. Substantially increased procedure times and resource use were observed with advanced workflows. Findings highlight opportunities to improve efficiency through anesthesia choice, imaging strategy, and planning workflow optimization. Implementing context-specific strategies will be crucial for IGBT transition.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Funding from the XXXX, in collaboration with XXXX and participating sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2026.10.028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Use of image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) in cervical cancer improves patient outcomes. However, implementation in resource-limited settings is challenging due to limited capacity upscale, absence of workflow enhancement strategies, and financial barriers. Optimizing workflows is essential, yet the relationship between workflow efficiency and IGBT uptake remains unclear.

Methods: This cross-sectional study examined brachytherapy (BT) workflows across 14 nationally representative centers. Standardized forms collected data on infrastructure, treatment workflows ((A): Conventional two-dimensional (2D) X-Ray-Guided BT, with point-A-based fractions planned using 2D X-ray imaging, (B): Standard intracavitary (IC) three-dimensional (3D) IGBT, with fractions planned using computed tomography (CT)- or magnetic resonance (MR)-based imaging with volume-based prescriptions, (C): Advanced 3D IGBT, with fractions delivered using advanced IC or intracavitary-interstitial (IC-IS) techniques and planned using CT- or MR-based imaging with volume-based prescriptions.)), procedural times, anesthesia, imaging, and treatment planning. National BT resource data was also collected. Recommendations were developed to optimize workflows and facilitate IGBT transition.

Findings: A total of 365 workflows were analyzed, wherein workflow B was most common (51%). Median procedure times were 2 hours 08 minutes (Interquartile range (IQR) 1 hour and 7 minutes), 2 hours 35 minutes (IQR 1 hour and 51 minutes), and 4 hours 16 minutes (IQR 2 hours and 33 minutes) for workflows A, B, and C, respectively. Using sedation instead of full anesthesia shortened workflows by a median of 35 minutes. BT machine demand, based on national cervical cancer incidence, ranged from 0.2 to 9.5; four countries had low (< 0.5), two moderate (0.5 - 1.0), and eight high demand (>1.0). Resource- and context-specific recommendations for IGBT transition were provided.

Interpretation: BT workflows varied widely. Substantially increased procedure times and resource use were observed with advanced workflows. Findings highlight opportunities to improve efficiency through anesthesia choice, imaging strategy, and planning workflow optimization. Implementing context-specific strategies will be crucial for IGBT transition.

Funding: Funding from the XXXX, in collaboration with XXXX and participating sites.

在资源有限的情况下实施图像引导近距离放射治疗(IGBT)宫颈癌:一项资源和工作流程影响的国际多中心横断面研究。
背景:在宫颈癌中使用图像引导近距离放射治疗(IGBT)可以改善患者的预后。然而,在资源有限的环境下,由于有限的能力升级,缺乏工作流增强策略和财务障碍,实现是具有挑战性的。优化工作流程是必要的,但工作流程效率和IGBT吸收之间的关系尚不清楚。方法:本横断面研究检查了14个全国代表性中心的近距离治疗(BT)工作流程。标准化表格收集了基础设施、治疗工作流程的数据((A):传统的二维(2D) x射线引导BT,使用二维x射线成像计划基于点的分数,(B):标准腔内(IC)三维(3D) IGBT,使用基于体积的处方的计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振(MR)成像计划分数,(C):先进的3D IGBT,使用先进的IC或腔内-间隙(IC- is)技术,并使用基于体积的处方进行CT或mr成像。)、手术时间、麻醉、成像和治疗计划。还收集了国家BT资源数据。提出了优化工作流程和促进IGBT过渡的建议。研究结果:共分析了365个工作流程,其中工作流程B最常见(51%)。工作流程A、B和C的中位操作时间分别为2小时08分钟(四分位数范围(IQR) 1小时7分钟)、2小时35分钟(IQR 1小时51分钟)和4小时16分钟(IQR 2小时33分钟)。使用镇静代替完全麻醉使工作流程平均缩短了35分钟。BT机需求,根据全国宫颈癌发病率,从0.2到9.5不等;4个国家需求低(< 0.5),2个中等(0.5 - 1.0),8个高(bbb1.0)。提供了针对IGBT过渡的资源和具体情况的建议。解释:BT工作流程变化很大。使用高级工作流程可以显著增加程序时间和资源使用。研究结果强调了通过麻醉选择、成像策略和规划工作流程优化来提高效率的机会。实施针对具体情况的战略对于IGBT转型至关重要。资助:由XXXX资助,由XXXX和参与网站合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书