Computer vision syndrome among high school students using digital versus printed textbooks: prevalence and associated factors.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2026-10-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1957177
Mar Seguí-Crespo, Mar Sánchez-Brau, José Miguel Martínez, Ana Tauste, Eva Artime-Ríos, Elena Ronda-Pérez
{"title":"Computer vision syndrome among high school students using digital versus printed textbooks: prevalence and associated factors.","authors":"Mar Seguí-Crespo, Mar Sánchez-Brau, José Miguel Martínez, Ana Tauste, Eva Artime-Ríos, Elena Ronda-Pérez","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2026.1957177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing implementation of digital textbooks in schools raises concerns regarding their potential impact on the ocular and visual health of adolescents. However, the effect of this educational shift on computer vision syndrome (CVS) has not yet been assessed using validated measurement tools.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study analyses the prevalence of CVS in adolescent students, comparing the use of printed versus digital textbooks, and considering sociodemographic, visual and digital devices exposure factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal observational study with repeated assessments of the same participants and estimation of CVS at four time points was conducted during the second academic semester in two high schools in Alicante, Spain (<i>n</i> = 231 students, 15-17 years old). One high school used printed textbooks, whereas the other implemented digital textbooks. An initial visual examination was performed, assessing visual acuity, objective and subjective refraction, eye movements, pupillary reflexes, and the cover test. At each visit, participants completed a questionnaire on digital device exposure and together with the validated CVS-Q© teen questionnaire. Generalized Estimating Equation logistic regression models were used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CVS prevalence was 56.7% among students using printed textbooks and 58.7% among those using digital textbooks to study, with no significant differences between groups (aOR = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.7). Being female and having an uncorrected refractive error were associated with a higher likelihood of CVS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CVS prevalence was similar among students using digital and printed textbooks, and this pattern remained after adjustment for relevant covariates. However, appropriate optical compensation should be used when necessary to prevent an increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"1957177"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13713640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1957177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing implementation of digital textbooks in schools raises concerns regarding their potential impact on the ocular and visual health of adolescents. However, the effect of this educational shift on computer vision syndrome (CVS) has not yet been assessed using validated measurement tools.

Objective: This study analyses the prevalence of CVS in adolescent students, comparing the use of printed versus digital textbooks, and considering sociodemographic, visual and digital devices exposure factors.

Methods: A longitudinal observational study with repeated assessments of the same participants and estimation of CVS at four time points was conducted during the second academic semester in two high schools in Alicante, Spain (n = 231 students, 15-17 years old). One high school used printed textbooks, whereas the other implemented digital textbooks. An initial visual examination was performed, assessing visual acuity, objective and subjective refraction, eye movements, pupillary reflexes, and the cover test. At each visit, participants completed a questionnaire on digital device exposure and together with the validated CVS-Q© teen questionnaire. Generalized Estimating Equation logistic regression models were used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results: CVS prevalence was 56.7% among students using printed textbooks and 58.7% among those using digital textbooks to study, with no significant differences between groups (aOR = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.7). Being female and having an uncorrected refractive error were associated with a higher likelihood of CVS.

Conclusion: CVS prevalence was similar among students using digital and printed textbooks, and this pattern remained after adjustment for relevant covariates. However, appropriate optical compensation should be used when necessary to prevent an increase.

使用数字和印刷教科书的高中生计算机视觉综合症:患病率和相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书