{"title":"Ordinal measurement invariance of three retained GAEU-1 dimensions in Chilean and Ecuadorian university samples.","authors":"Xinglong Pang, Lin Zhou, Jin-Ho Cho","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1990515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meaningful cross-national comparisons of self-regulated learning (SRL), motivation, and related learning-regulation constructs require evidence that the measurement model operates comparably across groups. We tested this requirement for three GAEU-1 dimensions previously retained in Chile and Ecuador using the open Version-5 dataset (<i>N</i> = 1,316; Chile <i>n</i> = 631; Ecuador <i>n</i> = 685). Fifteen ordered indicators representing the GAEU-1 SRL factor, conscious motivational strategies, and deep learning techniques were analyzed with WLSMV, followed by a Wu-Estabrook multigroup ordinal invariance sequence and complementary DIF analyses. Country-specific fit was mixed: CFI and SRMR were relatively favorable, whereas RMSEA indicated residual misspecification, especially in Chile (CFI = 0.947, SRMR = 0.059, RMSEA = 0.094; Ecuador: CFI = 0.952, SRMR = 0.059, RMSEA = 0.085). In the multigroup models, equality constraints on thresholds, loadings, and intercept-related parameters produced no meaningful deterioration in approximate fit, and met the study's prespecified incremental-fit criteria for proceeding to latent comparison within the retained scoring representation. Several items showed FDR-adjusted DIF signals, but none reached the prespecified 0.020 practical-effect criterion. <i>Post hoc</i> diagnostics localized the largest residual association to GA7-GA8 in both samples; a one-factor model fit appreciably worse than the retained three-factor representation (Delta CFI = -0.059 in Chile and -0.069 in Ecuador). Polychoric HTMT values were all below 0.85, although Fornell-Larcker diagnostics remained unfavorable for factor pairs involving the GAEU-1 SRL factor. Observed and latent standardized sample contrasts differed only modestly and are interpreted descriptively because the samples differed markedly in university sector and gender composition. The two planned sensitivity analyses and a <i>post hoc</i> private-university-only sensitivity analysis preserved the main comparability result. Overall, the three retained GAEU-1 dimensions showed stable measurement parameters across these Chilean and Ecuadorian university samples, while broader structural and country-level interpretations remain outside the evidence provided here.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1990515"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13716558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1990515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Meaningful cross-national comparisons of self-regulated learning (SRL), motivation, and related learning-regulation constructs require evidence that the measurement model operates comparably across groups. We tested this requirement for three GAEU-1 dimensions previously retained in Chile and Ecuador using the open Version-5 dataset (N = 1,316; Chile n = 631; Ecuador n = 685). Fifteen ordered indicators representing the GAEU-1 SRL factor, conscious motivational strategies, and deep learning techniques were analyzed with WLSMV, followed by a Wu-Estabrook multigroup ordinal invariance sequence and complementary DIF analyses. Country-specific fit was mixed: CFI and SRMR were relatively favorable, whereas RMSEA indicated residual misspecification, especially in Chile (CFI = 0.947, SRMR = 0.059, RMSEA = 0.094; Ecuador: CFI = 0.952, SRMR = 0.059, RMSEA = 0.085). In the multigroup models, equality constraints on thresholds, loadings, and intercept-related parameters produced no meaningful deterioration in approximate fit, and met the study's prespecified incremental-fit criteria for proceeding to latent comparison within the retained scoring representation. Several items showed FDR-adjusted DIF signals, but none reached the prespecified 0.020 practical-effect criterion. Post hoc diagnostics localized the largest residual association to GA7-GA8 in both samples; a one-factor model fit appreciably worse than the retained three-factor representation (Delta CFI = -0.059 in Chile and -0.069 in Ecuador). Polychoric HTMT values were all below 0.85, although Fornell-Larcker diagnostics remained unfavorable for factor pairs involving the GAEU-1 SRL factor. Observed and latent standardized sample contrasts differed only modestly and are interpreted descriptively because the samples differed markedly in university sector and gender composition. The two planned sensitivity analyses and a post hoc private-university-only sensitivity analysis preserved the main comparability result. Overall, the three retained GAEU-1 dimensions showed stable measurement parameters across these Chilean and Ecuadorian university samples, while broader structural and country-level interpretations remain outside the evidence provided here.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.