Ordinal measurement invariance of three retained GAEU-1 dimensions in Chilean and Ecuadorian university samples.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2026-10-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1990515
Xinglong Pang, Lin Zhou, Jin-Ho Cho
{"title":"Ordinal measurement invariance of three retained GAEU-1 dimensions in Chilean and Ecuadorian university samples.","authors":"Xinglong Pang, Lin Zhou, Jin-Ho Cho","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1990515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meaningful cross-national comparisons of self-regulated learning (SRL), motivation, and related learning-regulation constructs require evidence that the measurement model operates comparably across groups. We tested this requirement for three GAEU-1 dimensions previously retained in Chile and Ecuador using the open Version-5 dataset (<i>N</i> = 1,316; Chile <i>n</i> = 631; Ecuador <i>n</i> = 685). Fifteen ordered indicators representing the GAEU-1 SRL factor, conscious motivational strategies, and deep learning techniques were analyzed with WLSMV, followed by a Wu-Estabrook multigroup ordinal invariance sequence and complementary DIF analyses. Country-specific fit was mixed: CFI and SRMR were relatively favorable, whereas RMSEA indicated residual misspecification, especially in Chile (CFI = 0.947, SRMR = 0.059, RMSEA = 0.094; Ecuador: CFI = 0.952, SRMR = 0.059, RMSEA = 0.085). In the multigroup models, equality constraints on thresholds, loadings, and intercept-related parameters produced no meaningful deterioration in approximate fit, and met the study's prespecified incremental-fit criteria for proceeding to latent comparison within the retained scoring representation. Several items showed FDR-adjusted DIF signals, but none reached the prespecified 0.020 practical-effect criterion. <i>Post hoc</i> diagnostics localized the largest residual association to GA7-GA8 in both samples; a one-factor model fit appreciably worse than the retained three-factor representation (Delta CFI = -0.059 in Chile and -0.069 in Ecuador). Polychoric HTMT values were all below 0.85, although Fornell-Larcker diagnostics remained unfavorable for factor pairs involving the GAEU-1 SRL factor. Observed and latent standardized sample contrasts differed only modestly and are interpreted descriptively because the samples differed markedly in university sector and gender composition. The two planned sensitivity analyses and a <i>post hoc</i> private-university-only sensitivity analysis preserved the main comparability result. Overall, the three retained GAEU-1 dimensions showed stable measurement parameters across these Chilean and Ecuadorian university samples, while broader structural and country-level interpretations remain outside the evidence provided here.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1990515"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13716558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1990515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meaningful cross-national comparisons of self-regulated learning (SRL), motivation, and related learning-regulation constructs require evidence that the measurement model operates comparably across groups. We tested this requirement for three GAEU-1 dimensions previously retained in Chile and Ecuador using the open Version-5 dataset (N = 1,316; Chile n = 631; Ecuador n = 685). Fifteen ordered indicators representing the GAEU-1 SRL factor, conscious motivational strategies, and deep learning techniques were analyzed with WLSMV, followed by a Wu-Estabrook multigroup ordinal invariance sequence and complementary DIF analyses. Country-specific fit was mixed: CFI and SRMR were relatively favorable, whereas RMSEA indicated residual misspecification, especially in Chile (CFI = 0.947, SRMR = 0.059, RMSEA = 0.094; Ecuador: CFI = 0.952, SRMR = 0.059, RMSEA = 0.085). In the multigroup models, equality constraints on thresholds, loadings, and intercept-related parameters produced no meaningful deterioration in approximate fit, and met the study's prespecified incremental-fit criteria for proceeding to latent comparison within the retained scoring representation. Several items showed FDR-adjusted DIF signals, but none reached the prespecified 0.020 practical-effect criterion. Post hoc diagnostics localized the largest residual association to GA7-GA8 in both samples; a one-factor model fit appreciably worse than the retained three-factor representation (Delta CFI = -0.059 in Chile and -0.069 in Ecuador). Polychoric HTMT values were all below 0.85, although Fornell-Larcker diagnostics remained unfavorable for factor pairs involving the GAEU-1 SRL factor. Observed and latent standardized sample contrasts differed only modestly and are interpreted descriptively because the samples differed markedly in university sector and gender composition. The two planned sensitivity analyses and a post hoc private-university-only sensitivity analysis preserved the main comparability result. Overall, the three retained GAEU-1 dimensions showed stable measurement parameters across these Chilean and Ecuadorian university samples, while broader structural and country-level interpretations remain outside the evidence provided here.

智利和厄瓜多尔大学样本中三个保留GAEU-1维度的序数测量不变性。
自我调节学习(SRL)、动机和相关的学习调节结构的有意义的跨国比较需要证据证明测量模型在不同群体之间具有可比性。我们使用开放的Version-5数据集(N = 1,316;智利N = 631;厄瓜多尔N = 685)对先前在智利和厄瓜多尔保留的三个GAEU-1维度进行了测试。采用WLSMV分析了代表GAEU-1 SRL因子、有意识动机策略和深度学习技术的15个有序指标,然后采用wu - estouok多组有序不变性序列和互补DIF分析。国家特异性拟合是混合的:CFI和SRMR相对有利,而RMSEA表明残留的错误规范,特别是在智利(CFI = 0.947, SRMR = 0.059, RMSEA = 0.094;厄瓜多尔:CFI = 0.952, SRMR = 0.059, RMSEA = 0.085)。在多组模型中,阈值、负荷和截距相关参数的相等性约束在近似拟合中没有产生有意义的恶化,并且符合研究预先指定的增量拟合标准,以便在保留的评分表示中进行潜在比较。有几个项目显示fdr调整的DIF信号,但没有一个达到预先规定的0.020实际效果标准。事后诊断将两个样本中最大的残留关联定位为GA7-GA8;单因素模型的拟合明显不如保留的三因素表示(δ CFI = -0.059在智利和-0.069在厄瓜多尔)。多染色体HTMT值均低于0.85,尽管Fornell-Larcker诊断对于涉及GAEU-1 SRL因子的因子对仍然不利。由于样本在大学部门和性别构成上存在显著差异,因此观察到的和潜在的标准化样本对比仅存在适度差异,并进行描述性解释。两个计划的敏感性分析和事后仅私立大学的敏感性分析保留了主要的可比性结果。总体而言,保留的三个GAEU-1维度在这些智利和厄瓜多尔大学样本中显示了稳定的测量参数,而更广泛的结构和国家层面的解释仍然不在本文提供的证据范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书