A social exchange perspective on employee performance in Sierra Leone's public sector: the roles of authentic leadership, participative decision-making, and trust.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2026-10-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1885753
Ibrahim Sallieu Jalloh, Shixiang Li, Guangjin Zhang, H M Wasif Rasheed, Rashid Khurshid
{"title":"A social exchange perspective on employee performance in Sierra Leone's public sector: the roles of authentic leadership, participative decision-making, and trust.","authors":"Ibrahim Sallieu Jalloh, Shixiang Li, Guangjin Zhang, H M Wasif Rasheed, Rashid Khurshid","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1885753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Based on Social Exchange Theory (SET) and Social Information Processing (SIP), this research attempts to explore the effect that Participative Decision-Making (PDM) has on the performance of employees working in Sierra Leone's public sector using Affective Trust, Work Engagement, Affective Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) as mediating variables in relation to Authentic Leadership as a moderating variable.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>The study used a quantitative and cross-sectional research design. Data collection was conducted among public sector employees in Sierra Leone using a convenience sampling method. The study applied Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to assess the measurement and structural model hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The empirical results reveal that participative decision-making (PDM) associate with employee performance through affective trust, which associate to work engagement and affective commitment, resulting in organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). The variable of work engagement proved itself as a better predictor of OCB than affective commitment. Besides, authentic leadership moderated the relationship between affective trust and work engagement/affective commitment.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>The current research contributes to the SET and SIP frameworks by validating a step-by-step process leading to PDM, which ultimately influences Employee Performance. The study fills one of the significant gaps in the literature by providing evidence from an unexplored area of public sector employees in Sierra Leone.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1885753"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13716561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1885753","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Based on Social Exchange Theory (SET) and Social Information Processing (SIP), this research attempts to explore the effect that Participative Decision-Making (PDM) has on the performance of employees working in Sierra Leone's public sector using Affective Trust, Work Engagement, Affective Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) as mediating variables in relation to Authentic Leadership as a moderating variable.

Design/methodology/approach: The study used a quantitative and cross-sectional research design. Data collection was conducted among public sector employees in Sierra Leone using a convenience sampling method. The study applied Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to assess the measurement and structural model hypotheses.

Findings: The empirical results reveal that participative decision-making (PDM) associate with employee performance through affective trust, which associate to work engagement and affective commitment, resulting in organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). The variable of work engagement proved itself as a better predictor of OCB than affective commitment. Besides, authentic leadership moderated the relationship between affective trust and work engagement/affective commitment.

Originality/value: The current research contributes to the SET and SIP frameworks by validating a step-by-step process leading to PDM, which ultimately influences Employee Performance. The study fills one of the significant gaps in the literature by providing evidence from an unexplored area of public sector employees in Sierra Leone.

塞拉利昂公共部门员工绩效的社会交换视角:真实领导、参与性决策和信任的作用。
目的:本研究基于社会交换理论(SET)和社会信息加工理论(SIP),以情感信任、工作投入、情感承诺和组织公民行为(OCB)为中介变量,以真实领导为调节变量,探讨参与式决策(PDM)对塞拉利昂公共部门员工绩效的影响。设计/方法/方法:本研究采用定量和横断面研究设计。数据收集是在塞拉利昂的公共部门雇员中使用方便的抽样方法进行的。本研究采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)对测量和结构模型假设进行评估。研究发现:参与性决策通过情感信任与员工绩效相关联,情感信任与工作投入和情感承诺相关联,进而产生组织公民行为。工作投入比情感承诺更能预测组织行为。此外,真实型领导对情感信任与工作投入/情感承诺的关系有调节作用。原创性/价值:目前的研究通过验证导致最终影响员工绩效的PDM的逐步过程,为SET和SIP框架做出了贡献。该研究填补了文献中的一个重大空白,提供了来自塞拉利昂公共部门雇员未开发地区的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书