Beyond physical distance: how workplace loneliness links telecommuting to cyberloafing.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2026-10-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1978751
Usman Ghani, Yongnian Su, Yangyang Shi, Yufei Zhou, Jin Cheng
{"title":"Beyond physical distance: how workplace loneliness links telecommuting to cyberloafing.","authors":"Usman Ghani, Yongnian Su, Yangyang Shi, Yufei Zhou, Jin Cheng","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1978751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Telecommuting offers flexibility, but it may also be accompanied by fewer opportunities for everyday social connection in the workplace. Drawing on Conservation of Resources theory, this study examines how such social disconnection is associated with cyberloafing and why this process varies across employees. Using two-wave survey data from 350 employees in China with recent telecommuting experience, we found a significant indirect association between telecommuting and cyberloafing through workplace loneliness. This indirect association was weaker when employees reported higher-quality leader-member exchange or greater task interdependence. These two conditions reflect different forms of workplace resources: leader-member exchange provides relational support, whereas task interdependence sustains interaction through the organization of work itself. These findings shift attention away from whether telecommuting is inherently beneficial or harmful and toward the social resource conditions that shape employees' responses to working apart. They also offer a more nuanced view of cyberloafing as a possible short-term withdrawal-based digital response that is consistent with coping interpretations under conditions of diminished workplace connection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1978751"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13716549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1978751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Telecommuting offers flexibility, but it may also be accompanied by fewer opportunities for everyday social connection in the workplace. Drawing on Conservation of Resources theory, this study examines how such social disconnection is associated with cyberloafing and why this process varies across employees. Using two-wave survey data from 350 employees in China with recent telecommuting experience, we found a significant indirect association between telecommuting and cyberloafing through workplace loneliness. This indirect association was weaker when employees reported higher-quality leader-member exchange or greater task interdependence. These two conditions reflect different forms of workplace resources: leader-member exchange provides relational support, whereas task interdependence sustains interaction through the organization of work itself. These findings shift attention away from whether telecommuting is inherently beneficial or harmful and toward the social resource conditions that shape employees' responses to working apart. They also offer a more nuanced view of cyberloafing as a possible short-term withdrawal-based digital response that is consistent with coping interpretations under conditions of diminished workplace connection.

超越物理距离:职场孤独感如何将远程办公与网络闲逛联系起来。
远程办公提供了灵活性,但也可能伴随着在工作场所进行日常社交联系的机会减少。利用资源保护理论,本研究探讨了这种社会脱节是如何与网络闲逛联系在一起的,以及为什么这种过程在员工之间有所不同。通过对350名最近有过远程办公经历的中国员工的两波调查数据,我们发现远程办公与通过工作场所孤独感产生的网络闲逛之间存在显著的间接关联。当员工报告更高质量的领导成员交换或更大的任务相互依赖时,这种间接关联就会减弱。这两种情况反映了不同形式的工作场所资源:领导-成员交换提供关系支持,而任务相互依赖通过工作本身的组织来维持互动。这些发现将人们的注意力从远程办公本身是有益还是有害转移到了影响员工对分开工作的反应的社会资源条件上。他们还提供了一种更细致的观点,认为网络闲逛可能是一种基于退缩的短期数字反应,与在工作场所联系减少的情况下的应对解释是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书