Dynamic adaptation of attentional control across bilingual interactional contexts.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2026-10-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1860169
Min Li, Xiangyu Shi, Qinghong Xu, Jie Li
{"title":"Dynamic adaptation of attentional control across bilingual interactional contexts.","authors":"Min Li, Xiangyu Shi, Qinghong Xu, Jie Li","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1860169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Bilingual experience is thought to shape cognitive control via adaptive attentional reorganization, yet the neural mechanisms by which different interactional contexts dynamically modulate attentional control remain unclear. This study used EEG to examine how Chinese monolingual, English monolingual, bilingual, and voluntary naming contexts influence attentional control in Chinese-English bilinguals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five bilinguals completed picture-naming tasks in different contexts, followed by an antisaccade task with concurrent EEG. We analyzed reaction time, ERPs, frontal and parietal delta/theta power, and frontoparietal functional connectivity (wPLI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bilingual and voluntary naming contexts shortened antisaccade reaction times (all <i>p</i> < 0.01). No significant main effect of context was found on N2 amplitudes (<i>p</i> = 0.615). Both contexts reduced parietal delta and theta power relative to the English monolingual context (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Exploratory connectivity analysis initially suggested bilingual-context effects, but this finding did not survive homologous ROI validation. These preliminary sensor-level findings await validation by source-localized EEG or fMRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that bilingual and voluntary naming contexts may facilitate attentional control through adaptive reorganization of the attentional system rather than through enhancing a specific inhibitory process. This pattern is consistent with the adaptationist perspective on bilingual cognition and provides preliminary neural evidence for the language mode theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1860169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13716584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1860169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Bilingual experience is thought to shape cognitive control via adaptive attentional reorganization, yet the neural mechanisms by which different interactional contexts dynamically modulate attentional control remain unclear. This study used EEG to examine how Chinese monolingual, English monolingual, bilingual, and voluntary naming contexts influence attentional control in Chinese-English bilinguals.

Methods: Thirty-five bilinguals completed picture-naming tasks in different contexts, followed by an antisaccade task with concurrent EEG. We analyzed reaction time, ERPs, frontal and parietal delta/theta power, and frontoparietal functional connectivity (wPLI).

Results: Bilingual and voluntary naming contexts shortened antisaccade reaction times (all p < 0.01). No significant main effect of context was found on N2 amplitudes (p = 0.615). Both contexts reduced parietal delta and theta power relative to the English monolingual context (all p < 0.05). Exploratory connectivity analysis initially suggested bilingual-context effects, but this finding did not survive homologous ROI validation. These preliminary sensor-level findings await validation by source-localized EEG or fMRI.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that bilingual and voluntary naming contexts may facilitate attentional control through adaptive reorganization of the attentional system rather than through enhancing a specific inhibitory process. This pattern is consistent with the adaptationist perspective on bilingual cognition and provides preliminary neural evidence for the language mode theory.

双语互动环境中注意控制的动态适应。
背景/目的:双语经验被认为通过适应性注意重组形成认知控制,但不同互动环境动态调节注意控制的神经机制尚不清楚。本研究利用脑电图分析了汉语单语、英语单语、双语和自主命名语境对中英文双语者注意控制的影响。方法:35名双语者在不同情境下完成图片命名任务,随后进行并发脑电图反扫视任务。我们分析了反应时间、erp、额叶和顶叶δ / θ功率以及额顶叶功能连通性(wPLI)。结果:双语和自主命名情境缩短了抗扫视反应时间(均p < 0.01)。环境对N2振幅无显著主效应(p = 0.615)。相对于英语单语语境,这两种语境都降低了顶叶δ和θ能量(均p < 0.05)。探索性连通性分析最初提出了双语上下文效应,但这一发现并没有在相应的ROI验证中幸存下来。这些初步的传感器水平的发现有待于源定位脑电图或功能磁共振成像的验证。结论:这些发现表明,双语和自主命名情境可能通过注意系统的适应性重组而不是通过增强特定的抑制过程来促进注意控制。这一模式与适应主义的双语认知理论相一致,为语言模式理论提供了初步的神经学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书