Shear-wave elastography in rotator cuff tears: a systematic review of measurement properties, tissue-stiffness findings, and clinical interpretability.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Robert Trybulski, Tomasz Sozański, Adrian Kużdżał, Hsing-Kuo Wang, Gracjan Olaniszyn, Adam Kawczynski
{"title":"Shear-wave elastography in rotator cuff tears: a systematic review of measurement properties, tissue-stiffness findings, and clinical interpretability.","authors":"Robert Trybulski, Tomasz Sozański, Adrian Kużdżał, Hsing-Kuo Wang, Gracjan Olaniszyn, Adam Kawczynski","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-13009-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Shear-wave elastography (SWE) may quantify rotator cuff mechanical properties, but its measurement performance and clinical interpretability remain incompletely established. This work sought to synthesize evidence on the feasibility, measurement properties, and interpretability of rotator cuff SWE in adults with rotator cuff tears (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Eligible studies were in vivo primary studies in adults (≥ 18 years) with suspected or symptomatic rotator cuff disease in whom partial- or full-thickness RCT was confirmed by an imaging or surgical reference standard, including conventional ultrasound, MRI, CT, or arthroscopy, and/or studies including clinically relevant comparator shoulders or asymptomatic controls. Studies had to use ultrasound SWE with quantitative outputs, including shear-wave speed/velocity or modulus, in the supraspinatus tendon and/or rotator cuff muscles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen SWE studies were retained from 6273 records. Two primarily assessed reliability/repeatability. Intra-rater reproducibility was high in the primary reliability studies, including ICCs > 0.87 and 0.96, whereas inter-rater reproducibility was lower and variable, ranging from ICCs > 0.73 to 0.45. Eleven studies contributed construct-validity or known-groups evidence, one provided strict criterion-validity evidence against intraoperative passive stiffness, and two provided longitudinal postoperative evidence. SWE findings varied across tissue targets, devices, regions of interest, arm positions, comparators, and reference standards. Only one study explicitly defined chronicity, and direct postoperative/prognostic evidence was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SWE appears useful as a complementary quantitative imaging tool for selected rotator cuff tissue-characterization and measurement-property applications. However, inter-rater reproducibility, measurement error, chronicity assessment, and prognostic validity remain insufficiently established.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Can shear-wave elastography (SWE) address the unmet need for reliable quantitative rotator cuff tissue assessment beyond conventional imaging in adults with tears? Findings Thirteen studies showed high intra-rater reproducibility but variable inter-rater reproducibility. Evidence for chronicity assessment and prognosis remained sparse and heterogeneous. Clinical relevance SWE may complement ultrasound or MRI by quantifying selected rotator cuff mechanical properties, but current evidence does not justify using it alone to determine tear chronicity, reparability, or prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-13009-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Shear-wave elastography (SWE) may quantify rotator cuff mechanical properties, but its measurement performance and clinical interpretability remain incompletely established. This work sought to synthesize evidence on the feasibility, measurement properties, and interpretability of rotator cuff SWE in adults with rotator cuff tears (RCTs).

Materials and methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Eligible studies were in vivo primary studies in adults (≥ 18 years) with suspected or symptomatic rotator cuff disease in whom partial- or full-thickness RCT was confirmed by an imaging or surgical reference standard, including conventional ultrasound, MRI, CT, or arthroscopy, and/or studies including clinically relevant comparator shoulders or asymptomatic controls. Studies had to use ultrasound SWE with quantitative outputs, including shear-wave speed/velocity or modulus, in the supraspinatus tendon and/or rotator cuff muscles.

Results: Thirteen SWE studies were retained from 6273 records. Two primarily assessed reliability/repeatability. Intra-rater reproducibility was high in the primary reliability studies, including ICCs > 0.87 and 0.96, whereas inter-rater reproducibility was lower and variable, ranging from ICCs > 0.73 to 0.45. Eleven studies contributed construct-validity or known-groups evidence, one provided strict criterion-validity evidence against intraoperative passive stiffness, and two provided longitudinal postoperative evidence. SWE findings varied across tissue targets, devices, regions of interest, arm positions, comparators, and reference standards. Only one study explicitly defined chronicity, and direct postoperative/prognostic evidence was limited.

Conclusions: SWE appears useful as a complementary quantitative imaging tool for selected rotator cuff tissue-characterization and measurement-property applications. However, inter-rater reproducibility, measurement error, chronicity assessment, and prognostic validity remain insufficiently established.

Key points: Question Can shear-wave elastography (SWE) address the unmet need for reliable quantitative rotator cuff tissue assessment beyond conventional imaging in adults with tears? Findings Thirteen studies showed high intra-rater reproducibility but variable inter-rater reproducibility. Evidence for chronicity assessment and prognosis remained sparse and heterogeneous. Clinical relevance SWE may complement ultrasound or MRI by quantifying selected rotator cuff mechanical properties, but current evidence does not justify using it alone to determine tear chronicity, reparability, or prognosis.

肩袖撕裂的剪切波弹性成像:测量特性、组织刚度发现和临床可解释性的系统回顾。
目的:剪切波弹性成像(SWE)可以量化肩袖的力学特性,但其测量性能和临床可解释性仍不完全确定。本研究旨在综合证据,证明肩袖撕裂成人SWE的可行性、测量特性和可解释性。资料和方法:检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science。符合条件的研究是对疑似或症状性肩袖疾病的成人(≥18岁)进行的体内初步研究,其中部分或全层RCT通过影像学或手术参考标准(包括常规超声、MRI、CT或关节镜检查)证实,和/或包括临床相关比较肩或无症状对照的研究。研究必须使用超声SWE定量输出,包括冈上肌腱和/或肩袖肌肉的剪切波速度/速度或模量。结果:从6273份记录中保留了13份SWE研究。两个主要评估的可靠性/可重复性。在初级可靠性研究中,组内可重复性较高,包括ICCs 0.87和0.96,而组间可重复性较低且变化较大,范围从ICCs 0.73到0.45。11项研究提供了结构效度或已知组证据,1项研究提供了严格的标准效度证据,反对术中被动僵硬,2项研究提供了术后纵向证据。SWE结果因组织靶、器械、感兴趣区域、手臂位置、比较物和参考标准而异。只有一项研究明确定义了慢性,直接的术后/预后证据有限。结论:SWE作为一种补充性的定量成像工具,对于选择的肩袖组织表征和测量特性应用是有用的。然而,评估间的可重复性、测量误差、慢性评估和预后有效性仍未充分确定。剪切波弹性成像(SWE)能否解决成人撕裂患者在常规成像之外对可靠的定量肩袖组织评估的需求?13项研究显示较高的组内可重复性,但组间可重复性可变。慢性评估和预后的证据仍然稀少且不均匀。临床意义SWE可以通过量化选定的肌腱套力学特性来补充超声或MRI,但目前的证据不足以证明单独使用SWE来确定撕裂的慢性、可修复性或预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书