Development and validation of a preoperative biparametric MRI-based habitat model for risk stratification of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Pingping He, Ruiquan Chen, Qiaozhen Zheng, Minxuan Tian, Ming Chen, Wei Guo, Ruixiong You
{"title":"Development and validation of a preoperative biparametric MRI-based habitat model for risk stratification of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Pingping He, Ruiquan Chen, Qiaozhen Zheng, Minxuan Tian, Ming Chen, Wei Guo, Ruixiong You","doi":"10.1186/s12880-026-02630-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate preoperative risk stratification of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is essential for developing individualized treatment plans. This study developed an interpretable habitat model based on biparametric MRI to improve preoperative risk stratification in patients with NMIBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This two-center study enrolled a total of 206 patients. The internal dataset (n = 147) included the training set (n = 81), test set (n = 35), and time-sequential validation set (n = 31). The external dataset included 59 patients. The primary outcome was the dichotomized risk stratification according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines (low-intermediate risk vs. high-very high risk). K-means clustering was applied to segment tumors into habitat subregions. Following habitat feature extraction and selection, six habitat models were constructed, including support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), Gaussian process classifier, random forest, and multilayer perceptron (MLP). For comparison, a VI-RADS model and a clinical prediction model were also developed. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to interpret the optimal model and visualize its decision-making process. Furthermore, we conducted propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to evaluate the generalizability of the habitat models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All habitat models exhibited good diagnostic performance. The SVM habitat model achieved the highest AUC in both the training set (AUC = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.85-1.00) and the external validation set (AUC = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.61-1.00). It showed a trend toward better performance compared to the clinical model (AUC = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83) and the VI-RADS model (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.58-0.92) in both sets, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. After PSM balancing all baseline covariates (all SMD < 0.1), SVM still maintained stable predictive capacity (AUC = 0.72, sensitivity = 0.769) in matched external cohort, verifying good cross-center generalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our biparametric MRI-based habitat models, particularly the SVM classifier, showed a trend toward improved preoperative risk stratification of NMIBC. These findings require large multicenter prospective validation before clinical individualized treatment decisions and follow-up planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02630-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate preoperative risk stratification of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is essential for developing individualized treatment plans. This study developed an interpretable habitat model based on biparametric MRI to improve preoperative risk stratification in patients with NMIBC.

Methods: This two-center study enrolled a total of 206 patients. The internal dataset (n = 147) included the training set (n = 81), test set (n = 35), and time-sequential validation set (n = 31). The external dataset included 59 patients. The primary outcome was the dichotomized risk stratification according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines (low-intermediate risk vs. high-very high risk). K-means clustering was applied to segment tumors into habitat subregions. Following habitat feature extraction and selection, six habitat models were constructed, including support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), Gaussian process classifier, random forest, and multilayer perceptron (MLP). For comparison, a VI-RADS model and a clinical prediction model were also developed. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to interpret the optimal model and visualize its decision-making process. Furthermore, we conducted propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to evaluate the generalizability of the habitat models.

Results: All habitat models exhibited good diagnostic performance. The SVM habitat model achieved the highest AUC in both the training set (AUC = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.85-1.00) and the external validation set (AUC = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.61-1.00). It showed a trend toward better performance compared to the clinical model (AUC = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83) and the VI-RADS model (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.58-0.92) in both sets, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. After PSM balancing all baseline covariates (all SMD < 0.1), SVM still maintained stable predictive capacity (AUC = 0.72, sensitivity = 0.769) in matched external cohort, verifying good cross-center generalization.

Conclusion: Our biparametric MRI-based habitat models, particularly the SVM classifier, showed a trend toward improved preoperative risk stratification of NMIBC. These findings require large multicenter prospective validation before clinical individualized treatment decisions and follow-up planning.

非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌风险分层的术前双参数mri栖息地模型的建立和验证。
背景:准确的非肌浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)术前风险分层对于制定个体化治疗方案至关重要。本研究建立了一种基于双参数MRI的可解释栖息地模型,以改善NMIBC患者的术前风险分层。方法:这项双中心研究共纳入206例患者。内部数据集(n = 147)包括训练集(n = 81)、测试集(n = 35)和时间序列验证集(n = 31)。外部数据集包括59例患者。主要结果是根据欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)指南进行的风险分层(低-中危vs高-非常高危)。采用K-means聚类方法将肿瘤划分为生境亚区。通过对栖息地特征的提取和选择,构建了支持向量机(SVM)、逻辑回归、线性判别分析(LDA)、高斯过程分类器(Gaussian process classifier)、随机森林(random forest)和多层感知器(multilayer perceptron)等6个栖息地模型。为了比较,我们还建立了VI-RADS模型和临床预测模型。采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析对最优模型进行解释,并将其决策过程可视化。此外,我们还进行了倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析,以评估生境模型的通用性。结果:所有生境模型均具有较好的诊断效果。SVM栖息地模型在训练集(AUC = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.85-1.00)和外部验证集(AUC = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.61-1.00)的AUC均最高。与临床模型(AUC = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.83)和VI-RADS模型(AUC = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.58-0.92)相比,两组患者均表现出更好的表现趋势,但差异未达到统计学意义。结论:我们基于双参数mri的栖息地模型,特别是SVM分类器,显示出改善NMIBC术前风险分层的趋势。这些发现需要在临床个体化治疗决策和随访计划之前进行大规模的多中心前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书