PMF Resolved Source Identification & Health Risk Assessment of Trace-elements in Airborne Particulate Matter (PM10) from South-Asian Megacity.

IF 11.3
Muhammad Usman Alvi, Junaid Anwer, Farhan Anwer
{"title":"PMF Resolved Source Identification & Health Risk Assessment of Trace-elements in Airborne Particulate Matter (PM10) from South-Asian Megacity.","authors":"Muhammad Usman Alvi, Junaid Anwer, Farhan Anwer","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.144032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To mitigate the adverse effects of airborne particulate matter, it is crucial to comprehend its composition, size distribution and corresponding emission inventories. In this study, we investigated the sources of trace elements in PM10 from the Faisalabad metropolitan area, situated in the Indo-Gangetic Plain. We employed ICP-OES for the analysis of trace elements. The average PM10 concentration was 517 ± 206 µgm<sup>-3</sup>, exceeding safety levels established by Pak-EPA (150 μgm<sup>-3</sup>), US-EPA (150 μgm<sup>-3</sup>), and WHO (50 μgm<sup>-3</sup>). Notably, higher concentrations were observed in summer than in autumn and winter. On average, elemental concentrations followed the order: Fe > Al > Si > Zn > Cu > Pb > Cd > Sn > B > Se > Ni > Co > Mn > Cr > Mo > Sb > Ba > V > As > Zr. The PMF model predicted seven major sources for elemental contents, including metal works, vehicular exhaust and non-exhaust emissions, burning of fossil fuels in industries, municipal waste incineration, and industrial mixed dust. Furthermore, a health risk assessment revealed that the Cumulative Carcinogenic Risk (CCR) for adults (1.22 ×10⁻³) and children (5.05 ×10⁻⁴) exceeded the WHO/USEPA upper limit (1 ×10⁻⁴) by factors of 12.2 and 5.05 respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":94082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials","volume":"518 ","pages":"144032"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.144032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To mitigate the adverse effects of airborne particulate matter, it is crucial to comprehend its composition, size distribution and corresponding emission inventories. In this study, we investigated the sources of trace elements in PM10 from the Faisalabad metropolitan area, situated in the Indo-Gangetic Plain. We employed ICP-OES for the analysis of trace elements. The average PM10 concentration was 517 ± 206 µgm-3, exceeding safety levels established by Pak-EPA (150 μgm-3), US-EPA (150 μgm-3), and WHO (50 μgm-3). Notably, higher concentrations were observed in summer than in autumn and winter. On average, elemental concentrations followed the order: Fe > Al > Si > Zn > Cu > Pb > Cd > Sn > B > Se > Ni > Co > Mn > Cr > Mo > Sb > Ba > V > As > Zr. The PMF model predicted seven major sources for elemental contents, including metal works, vehicular exhaust and non-exhaust emissions, burning of fossil fuels in industries, municipal waste incineration, and industrial mixed dust. Furthermore, a health risk assessment revealed that the Cumulative Carcinogenic Risk (CCR) for adults (1.22 ×10⁻³) and children (5.05 ×10⁻⁴) exceeded the WHO/USEPA upper limit (1 ×10⁻⁴) by factors of 12.2 and 5.05 respectively.

南亚特大城市大气颗粒物(PM10)中微量元素的PMF解析源识别与健康风险评估
为了减轻空气中颗粒物的不利影响,了解其组成、大小分布和相应的排放清单至关重要。在本研究中,我们调查了位于印度恒河平原的费萨拉巴德大都市区PM10中微量元素的来源。采用ICP-OES进行微量元素分析。PM10的平均浓度为517 ± 206 μgm-3,超过了Pak-EPA (150 μgm-3)、US-EPA (150 μgm-3)和WHO (50 μgm-3)的安全标准。值得注意的是,夏季浓度高于秋季和冬季。平均、元素浓度跟随订单:铁> Al > Si > 锌> 铜> Pb > Cd > Sn > B > Se > 倪> 有限公司> Mn > Cr > 莫> 某人> 英航> V > 作为> 锆。PMF模型预测了元素含量的7个主要来源,包括金属工厂、汽车尾气和非尾气排放、工业燃烧化石燃料、城市垃圾焚烧和工业混合粉尘。此外,一项健康风险评估显示,成人(1.22 ×10⁻³)和儿童(5.05 ×10⁻⁴)的累积致癌风险(CCR)分别超过了WHO/USEPA的上限(1 ×10⁻⁴)12.2和5.05倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书