Felipe Beraldo da Cruz, Fernanda Quadros Fuzato, Victor Luiz Ossick Evangelista, Cintia de Almeida Ribeiro, Guenda Meffe, Sara Ramella, Lucio Pereira Neves, Ana Paula Perini
{"title":"Monte Carlo Evaluation of Scalp Dose in Whole Brain Radiotherapy","authors":"Felipe Beraldo da Cruz, Fernanda Quadros Fuzato, Victor Luiz Ossick Evangelista, Cintia de Almeida Ribeiro, Guenda Meffe, Sara Ramella, Lucio Pereira Neves, Ana Paula Perini","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2026.114580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the scalp dose during whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) using Monte Carlo simulations. The dose-depth relationship in the scalp was established by modelling structures at different depths derived from the ICRP 145 MRCP skin surface using Blender. Different scalp subdivisions were also defined to provide a more detailed analysis of the dose distribution. The results showed that the most superficial scalp region (0-1 mm) received a mean dose of 11.94 Gy, whereas the hair follicle layer (4-5 mm) received a mean dose of 22.31 Gy, demonstrating a substantial increase in dose with depth. Regional analysis at the follicular depth revealed spatial heterogeneity, with mean doses ranging from 17.35 Gy in the vertex to 31.96 Gy in the occipital region, and an overall mean of 24.82 Gy. Because these region-specific mean doses remained below the 36 Gy threshold for permanent alopecia but uniformly exceeded the 20 Gy threshold for transient hair loss, the occurrence of widespread temporary alopecia is expected. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of evaluating depth-resolved and region-specific dose distributions in the scalp during WBRT.","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2026.114580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigated the scalp dose during whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) using Monte Carlo simulations. The dose-depth relationship in the scalp was established by modelling structures at different depths derived from the ICRP 145 MRCP skin surface using Blender. Different scalp subdivisions were also defined to provide a more detailed analysis of the dose distribution. The results showed that the most superficial scalp region (0-1 mm) received a mean dose of 11.94 Gy, whereas the hair follicle layer (4-5 mm) received a mean dose of 22.31 Gy, demonstrating a substantial increase in dose with depth. Regional analysis at the follicular depth revealed spatial heterogeneity, with mean doses ranging from 17.35 Gy in the vertex to 31.96 Gy in the occipital region, and an overall mean of 24.82 Gy. Because these region-specific mean doses remained below the 36 Gy threshold for permanent alopecia but uniformly exceeded the 20 Gy threshold for transient hair loss, the occurrence of widespread temporary alopecia is expected. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of evaluating depth-resolved and region-specific dose distributions in the scalp during WBRT.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.