{"title":"A clinical-biomechanical model of combined resection-recession surgery of the inferior rectus muscle in incomitant strabismus.","authors":"José Alberto Reche-Sainz","doi":"10.1080/09273972.2026.2755475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a simplified clinical-biomechanical framework for two observations in inferior rectus resection-recession surgery: the shortening-to-recession ratio (S/R, where S is the resection or shortening amount and R is the recession amount) is generally below unity, and satisfactory primary-position alignment may coexist with postoperative infraduction limitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A conceptual biomechanical framework was developed based on two distinct consequences of inferior rectus recession: alteration of alignment-related force balance and alteration of anterior muscle-globe geometry. Resection was considered to compensate primarily for the alignment-related component, whereas recession was assumed to influence both static alignment and dynamic force transmission. Published clinical case series were used for contextual comparison; no systematic review or pooled analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The framework separates the alignment-related effect of recession from the associated alteration of anterior muscle-globe geometry, explaining how satisfactory primary-position alignment can coexist with postoperative infraduction limitation. The predominantly subunitary S/R ratios reported in clinical series are consistent with this interpretation and support the mechanical plausibility of non-1:1 compensation; optimal surgical dosage remains empirical.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inferior rectus resection-recession surgery addresses two partially independent biomechanical objectives: restoration of primary-position alignment and preservation of dynamic downgaze function. This framework helps interpret both commonly used subunitary surgical ratios and the dissociation between alignment and function observed in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51700,"journal":{"name":"Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2026.2755475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a simplified clinical-biomechanical framework for two observations in inferior rectus resection-recession surgery: the shortening-to-recession ratio (S/R, where S is the resection or shortening amount and R is the recession amount) is generally below unity, and satisfactory primary-position alignment may coexist with postoperative infraduction limitation.
Methods: A conceptual biomechanical framework was developed based on two distinct consequences of inferior rectus recession: alteration of alignment-related force balance and alteration of anterior muscle-globe geometry. Resection was considered to compensate primarily for the alignment-related component, whereas recession was assumed to influence both static alignment and dynamic force transmission. Published clinical case series were used for contextual comparison; no systematic review or pooled analysis was performed.
Results: The framework separates the alignment-related effect of recession from the associated alteration of anterior muscle-globe geometry, explaining how satisfactory primary-position alignment can coexist with postoperative infraduction limitation. The predominantly subunitary S/R ratios reported in clinical series are consistent with this interpretation and support the mechanical plausibility of non-1:1 compensation; optimal surgical dosage remains empirical.
Conclusions: Inferior rectus resection-recession surgery addresses two partially independent biomechanical objectives: restoration of primary-position alignment and preservation of dynamic downgaze function. This framework helps interpret both commonly used subunitary surgical ratios and the dissociation between alignment and function observed in practice.