Alexander H J Sahm, Stephanie N L Schmidt, Alexander Wolber, Matthias Burghart, Daniela Mier
{"title":"It is what it is: A comparative fMRI study on the regulation of negative emotions via distraction, reappraisal, and acceptance.","authors":"Alexander H J Sahm, Stephanie N L Schmidt, Alexander Wolber, Matthias Burghart, Daniela Mier","doi":"10.3758/s13415-026-01501-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the neural correlates of emotion regulation (ER) have frequently been investigated, only a few studies have compared the neural correlates of several ER strategies against one another. We present the fMRI data from 42 female participants who, in a within-subject design, viewed negative images depicting human suffering as well as neutral landscapes. For the negative images only, participants applied the ER strategies of distraction, reappraisal, and acceptance. Emotion regulation compared with viewing negative stimuli showed activation in frontal and temporoparietal regions. Direct comparisons between strategies revealed increased engagement of prefrontal and cingulate networks during acceptance and reappraisal compared with distraction, while distraction showed stronger recruitment of occipital and parietal regions. Acceptance differed from reappraisal with greater activation in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and fusiform and lingual gyri. Our results indicate that distraction mostly relies on regions involved in visual perception and attention. Acceptance and reappraisal resemble one another in the recruitment of areas related to cognitive control. However, acceptance also shows activation in areas related to visual processing that is absent in reappraisal, possibly reflective of deeper engagement with the stimulus. These findings highlight both commonalities and differences among major ER strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-026-01501-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While the neural correlates of emotion regulation (ER) have frequently been investigated, only a few studies have compared the neural correlates of several ER strategies against one another. We present the fMRI data from 42 female participants who, in a within-subject design, viewed negative images depicting human suffering as well as neutral landscapes. For the negative images only, participants applied the ER strategies of distraction, reappraisal, and acceptance. Emotion regulation compared with viewing negative stimuli showed activation in frontal and temporoparietal regions. Direct comparisons between strategies revealed increased engagement of prefrontal and cingulate networks during acceptance and reappraisal compared with distraction, while distraction showed stronger recruitment of occipital and parietal regions. Acceptance differed from reappraisal with greater activation in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and fusiform and lingual gyri. Our results indicate that distraction mostly relies on regions involved in visual perception and attention. Acceptance and reappraisal resemble one another in the recruitment of areas related to cognitive control. However, acceptance also shows activation in areas related to visual processing that is absent in reappraisal, possibly reflective of deeper engagement with the stimulus. These findings highlight both commonalities and differences among major ER strategies.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.