It is what it is: A comparative fMRI study on the regulation of negative emotions via distraction, reappraisal, and acceptance.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Alexander H J Sahm, Stephanie N L Schmidt, Alexander Wolber, Matthias Burghart, Daniela Mier
{"title":"It is what it is: A comparative fMRI study on the regulation of negative emotions via distraction, reappraisal, and acceptance.","authors":"Alexander H J Sahm, Stephanie N L Schmidt, Alexander Wolber, Matthias Burghart, Daniela Mier","doi":"10.3758/s13415-026-01501-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the neural correlates of emotion regulation (ER) have frequently been investigated, only a few studies have compared the neural correlates of several ER strategies against one another. We present the fMRI data from 42 female participants who, in a within-subject design, viewed negative images depicting human suffering as well as neutral landscapes. For the negative images only, participants applied the ER strategies of distraction, reappraisal, and acceptance. Emotion regulation compared with viewing negative stimuli showed activation in frontal and temporoparietal regions. Direct comparisons between strategies revealed increased engagement of prefrontal and cingulate networks during acceptance and reappraisal compared with distraction, while distraction showed stronger recruitment of occipital and parietal regions. Acceptance differed from reappraisal with greater activation in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and fusiform and lingual gyri. Our results indicate that distraction mostly relies on regions involved in visual perception and attention. Acceptance and reappraisal resemble one another in the recruitment of areas related to cognitive control. However, acceptance also shows activation in areas related to visual processing that is absent in reappraisal, possibly reflective of deeper engagement with the stimulus. These findings highlight both commonalities and differences among major ER strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-026-01501-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the neural correlates of emotion regulation (ER) have frequently been investigated, only a few studies have compared the neural correlates of several ER strategies against one another. We present the fMRI data from 42 female participants who, in a within-subject design, viewed negative images depicting human suffering as well as neutral landscapes. For the negative images only, participants applied the ER strategies of distraction, reappraisal, and acceptance. Emotion regulation compared with viewing negative stimuli showed activation in frontal and temporoparietal regions. Direct comparisons between strategies revealed increased engagement of prefrontal and cingulate networks during acceptance and reappraisal compared with distraction, while distraction showed stronger recruitment of occipital and parietal regions. Acceptance differed from reappraisal with greater activation in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and fusiform and lingual gyri. Our results indicate that distraction mostly relies on regions involved in visual perception and attention. Acceptance and reappraisal resemble one another in the recruitment of areas related to cognitive control. However, acceptance also shows activation in areas related to visual processing that is absent in reappraisal, possibly reflective of deeper engagement with the stimulus. These findings highlight both commonalities and differences among major ER strategies.

这就是它:一项通过分心、重新评估和接受来调节负面情绪的比较fMRI研究。
虽然情绪调节(ER)的神经相关性经常被研究,但只有少数研究将几种情绪调节策略的神经相关性相互比较。我们展示了42名女性参与者的功能磁共振成像数据,在受试者内设计中,他们观看了描绘人类痛苦的负面图像以及中性景观。仅对于负面图像,参与者采用分心、重新评价和接受的ER策略。与观看负面刺激相比,情绪调节在额叶和颞顶叶区域被激活。直接比较结果显示,在接受和重新评价过程中,与分心相比,前额叶和扣带神经网络的参与增加,而分心则表现出更强的枕叶和顶叶区域的招募。接受与重新评价不同,背内侧前额叶皮层、梭状回和舌回的激活程度更高。我们的研究结果表明,注意力分散主要依赖于视觉感知和注意力相关的区域。接受和重新评价在认知控制相关区域的招募上是相似的。然而,接受也显示了与视觉处理相关的区域的激活,这在重新评估中是不存在的,可能反映了与刺激的更深层次的接触。这些发现突出了主要急诊室策略之间的共性和差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书