The Statistical Robustness of Literature on Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Prabhjot Singh, Mark Kurapatti, Niklas Koehne, Ishandeep Singh, Jennifer Yu, Gray W Ricca, Nicholas Richardson, Robert L Parisien
{"title":"The Statistical Robustness of Literature on Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis.","authors":"Prabhjot Singh, Mark Kurapatti, Niklas Koehne, Ishandeep Singh, Jennifer Yu, Gray W Ricca, Nicholas Richardson, Robert L Parisien","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2026.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is widely used in the treatment of plantar fasciitis; however, the statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) supporting its use remains unclear. This study evaluates the fragility of dichotomous outcomes in RCTs on ESWT for plantar fasciitis using fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient (FQ) metrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus was conducted on March 1, 2025, to identify RCTs investigating ESWT for plantar fasciitis. Eligible studies included dichotomous outcomes in comparison to no treatment or alternative interventions. FI was calculated using two-tailed Fisher's exact tests. FQ was computed by dividing FI by the study's sample size. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on outcome type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen RCTs met inclusion criteria, yielding 159 dichotomous outcomes. Of these, 20 outcomes were statistically significant (p < 0.05) and 139 were nonsignificant. The overall median FI was 5 (IQR:3-6) and FQ was 0.061 (IQR:0.040-0.108), indicating that reversal of 6.1% of patient outcomes could change statistical significance. Among significant outcomes, the median FI was 5 (IQR:2-11) and FQ was 0.029 (IQR:0.016-0.212). Pain outcomes were most frequently reported (n = 112). Subgroup analysis revealed that outcomes related to physical function were most fragile (FQ:0.036), while ultrasound-based outcomes were least fragile (FQ:0.081). In 20.75% of outcomes, the number of patients lost to follow-up exceeded the FI, suggesting that outcome significance could be altered by follow-up alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dichotomous outcomes in RCTs evaluating ESWT for plantar fasciitis demonstrate notable statistical fragility. Given that a small number of event reversals can shift the interpretation of many findings, clinicians should interpret statistically significant ESWT outcomes with caution. Future studies should incorporate fragility metrics to improve transparency and support more reliable clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Systematic Review.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2026.10.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is widely used in the treatment of plantar fasciitis; however, the statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) supporting its use remains unclear. This study evaluates the fragility of dichotomous outcomes in RCTs on ESWT for plantar fasciitis using fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient (FQ) metrics.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus was conducted on March 1, 2025, to identify RCTs investigating ESWT for plantar fasciitis. Eligible studies included dichotomous outcomes in comparison to no treatment or alternative interventions. FI was calculated using two-tailed Fisher's exact tests. FQ was computed by dividing FI by the study's sample size. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on outcome type.

Results: Nineteen RCTs met inclusion criteria, yielding 159 dichotomous outcomes. Of these, 20 outcomes were statistically significant (p < 0.05) and 139 were nonsignificant. The overall median FI was 5 (IQR:3-6) and FQ was 0.061 (IQR:0.040-0.108), indicating that reversal of 6.1% of patient outcomes could change statistical significance. Among significant outcomes, the median FI was 5 (IQR:2-11) and FQ was 0.029 (IQR:0.016-0.212). Pain outcomes were most frequently reported (n = 112). Subgroup analysis revealed that outcomes related to physical function were most fragile (FQ:0.036), while ultrasound-based outcomes were least fragile (FQ:0.081). In 20.75% of outcomes, the number of patients lost to follow-up exceeded the FI, suggesting that outcome significance could be altered by follow-up alone.

Conclusions: Dichotomous outcomes in RCTs evaluating ESWT for plantar fasciitis demonstrate notable statistical fragility. Given that a small number of event reversals can shift the interpretation of many findings, clinicians should interpret statistically significant ESWT outcomes with caution. Future studies should incorporate fragility metrics to improve transparency and support more reliable clinical decision-making.

Study type: Systematic Review.

体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎文献的统计稳健性。
背景:体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)广泛应用于足底筋膜炎的治疗;然而,支持其使用的随机对照试验(rct)的统计稳健性尚不清楚。本研究使用脆弱性指数(FI)和脆弱性商数(FQ)指标评估了ESWT治疗足底筋膜炎的随机对照试验中二分结果的脆弱性。方法:于2025年3月1日对PubMed和Scopus进行系统检索,以确定研究ESWT治疗足底筋膜炎的随机对照试验。符合条件的研究包括与不治疗或替代干预相比较的两种结果。FI采用双尾Fisher精确检验计算。FQ是用FI除以研究的样本量来计算的。根据结果类型进行亚组分析。结果:19项rct符合纳入标准,产生159个二分类结果。其中20个结果有统计学意义(p < 0.05), 139个结果无统计学意义。总体中位FI为5 (IQR:3-6), FQ为0.061 (IQR:0.040-0.108),表明6.1%的患者结局逆转具有统计学意义。在显著结局中,FI中位数为5 (IQR:2-11), FQ中位数为0.029 (IQR:0.016-0.212)。最常报道的是疼痛结果(n = 112)。亚组分析显示,与身体功能相关的结果最脆弱(FQ:0.036),而基于超声的结果最不脆弱(FQ:0.081)。在20.75%的结果中,失去随访的患者数量超过了FI,这表明单独随访可能改变结果的意义。结论:评估ESWT治疗足底筋膜炎的随机对照试验的二分结果显示出显著的统计学脆弱性。鉴于少量的事件逆转可以改变对许多结果的解释,临床医生应该谨慎地解释具有统计学意义的ESWT结果。未来的研究应纳入脆弱性指标,以提高透明度,支持更可靠的临床决策。研究类型:系统评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书