Traumatic Emergency Thoracotomy for Resuscitation in Shock (TETRiS): a national service evaluation of resuscitative thoracotomy practice outside the operating theatre.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Lisa Ramage, Harriet Tucker, Max Er Marsden, Jared M Wohlgemut, Salman Naeem, Michael Christian, Ross Davenport, Zane B Perkins
{"title":"Traumatic Emergency Thoracotomy for Resuscitation in Shock (TETRiS): a national service evaluation of resuscitative thoracotomy practice outside the operating theatre.","authors":"Lisa Ramage, Harriet Tucker, Max Er Marsden, Jared M Wohlgemut, Salman Naeem, Michael Christian, Ross Davenport, Zane B Perkins","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is performed in patients with traumatic cardiac arrest or peri-arrest to treat potentially reversible causes of circulatory collapse. Optimal patient selection and timing remain uncertain, and existing evidence is largely retrospective, often excluding prehospital deaths. This prospective service evaluation examined contemporary RT practice and outcomes across a national major trauma system, including prehospital and emergency department settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective 12-month observational study across 20 UK Helicopter Emergency Medical Services and 26 Major Trauma Centre Emergency Departments, using the PHOTON, TERN, and NaTRIC research networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 116 patients underwent RT, of which 82 (70.7%) were performed prehospital. Median age was 30 years, 97 patients (83.6%) were male, and 81 (69.8%) sustained penetrating injury. Suspected cardiac tamponade was the most common indication for RT (72/116 [62.1%]), although operative findings demonstrated exsanguinating haemorrhage in 82 patients (70.7%). Overall, 50 patients (43.1%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation and eight (6.9%) survived to hospital discharge. Survival was strongly associated with pathophysiological cause, duration of arrest, and physiological state at the time of intervention, with substantially better outcomes observed in patients with cardiac tamponade than exsanguination. Patients undergoing emergency department RT demonstrated shorter arrest durations, more favourable physiology, and higher survival than those undergoing prehospital RT. There were no survivors beyond 10 minutes of traumatic cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this prospective national evaluation of RT practice, outcomes were strongly associated with the pathophysiological cause and duration of arrest, and the residual physiology present at the time of intervention. The most favourable outcomes were observed in patients with cardiac tamponade and those undergoing RT before irreversible physiological deterioration.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"111371"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111371","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is performed in patients with traumatic cardiac arrest or peri-arrest to treat potentially reversible causes of circulatory collapse. Optimal patient selection and timing remain uncertain, and existing evidence is largely retrospective, often excluding prehospital deaths. This prospective service evaluation examined contemporary RT practice and outcomes across a national major trauma system, including prehospital and emergency department settings.

Methods: Prospective 12-month observational study across 20 UK Helicopter Emergency Medical Services and 26 Major Trauma Centre Emergency Departments, using the PHOTON, TERN, and NaTRIC research networks.

Results: A total of 116 patients underwent RT, of which 82 (70.7%) were performed prehospital. Median age was 30 years, 97 patients (83.6%) were male, and 81 (69.8%) sustained penetrating injury. Suspected cardiac tamponade was the most common indication for RT (72/116 [62.1%]), although operative findings demonstrated exsanguinating haemorrhage in 82 patients (70.7%). Overall, 50 patients (43.1%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation and eight (6.9%) survived to hospital discharge. Survival was strongly associated with pathophysiological cause, duration of arrest, and physiological state at the time of intervention, with substantially better outcomes observed in patients with cardiac tamponade than exsanguination. Patients undergoing emergency department RT demonstrated shorter arrest durations, more favourable physiology, and higher survival than those undergoing prehospital RT. There were no survivors beyond 10 minutes of traumatic cardiac arrest.

Conclusion: In this prospective national evaluation of RT practice, outcomes were strongly associated with the pathophysiological cause and duration of arrest, and the residual physiology present at the time of intervention. The most favourable outcomes were observed in patients with cardiac tamponade and those undergoing RT before irreversible physiological deterioration.

创伤性紧急开胸术用于休克复苏(TETRiS):一项国家服务对手术室外开胸术的评估。
背景:复苏开胸术(RT)是在创伤性心脏骤停或停搏期患者中进行的,用于治疗可能可逆的循环衰竭原因。最佳患者选择和时机仍然不确定,现有证据主要是回顾性的,通常不包括院前死亡。这项前瞻性服务评估检查了当代RT实践和全国主要创伤系统的结果,包括院前和急诊科设置。方法:使用PHOTON、TERN和NaTRIC研究网络,对20个英国直升机紧急医疗服务中心和26个主要创伤中心急诊科进行为期12个月的前瞻性观察研究。结果:共116例患者行放射治疗,其中院前行放射治疗82例(70.7%)。中位年龄30岁,男性97例(83.6%),81例(69.8%)为穿透伤。疑似心包填塞是RT治疗最常见的适应症(72/116[62.1%]),尽管82例(70.7%)患者的手术结果显示出出血。总体而言,50例患者(43.1%)恢复了自然循环,8例患者(6.9%)存活至出院。生存与干预时的病理生理原因、骤停持续时间和生理状态密切相关,心包填塞患者的预后明显优于放血患者。接受急诊科RT的患者比院前RT的患者表现出更短的骤停持续时间,更有利的生理状况和更高的生存率。创伤性心脏骤停没有超过10分钟的幸存者。结论:在这项对RT实践的前瞻性国家评估中,结果与病理生理原因和骤停持续时间以及干预时存在的残留生理密切相关。在心包填塞患者和在不可逆生理恶化之前接受RT治疗的患者中观察到最有利的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书