ICFA: A new IADL-based assessment of cognitive flexibility for individuals with schizophrenia.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Lin-Jye Huang, Hui-Fen Mao, Shih-Chieh Lee, Yi-Hong Yang, Shu-Chun Lee, Yi-Ching Wu, Chien-Te Wu
{"title":"ICFA: A new IADL-based assessment of cognitive flexibility for individuals with schizophrenia.","authors":"Lin-Jye Huang, Hui-Fen Mao, Shih-Chieh Lee, Yi-Hong Yang, Shu-Chun Lee, Yi-Ching Wu, Chien-Te Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2026.10.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Cognitive flexibility deficits contribute substantially to functional disability in individuals with schizophrenia, yet existing neuropsychological measures remain limited in clinical utility, as they lack ecological connection and rarely distinguish spontaneous (sCF) from reactive (rCF) cognitive flexibility. To address this gap, this study developed and validated the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living-context-based Cognitive Flexibility Assessment (ICFA), a novel instrument designed to separately and simultaneously assess both rCF and sCF in real-life contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ICFA was developed based on literature reviews, then content-validated via the Delphi method. Reliability and validity were subsequently examined in a clinical sample of individuals with schizophrenia (n = 112).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICFA demonstrated good internal consistencies (Cronbach's α = 0.83 for sCF and 0.86 for rCF) and moderate to good test-retest reliabilities (ICC<sub>2,1</sub> = 0.73 for sCF and 0.80 for rCF). Adequate criterion, convergent, discriminant, and ecological validities were also supported by moderate to strong correlations between ICFA scores and conceptually relevant references (ρ = 0.29∼0.78). Furthermore, known-groups validity was established through significantly large differences (Cohen's d = 0.81-1.34, p < 0.001) between propensity score-matched samples of individuals with schizophrenia and healthy controls (n = 54 per group).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that ICFA offers a psychometrically sound and ecologically grounded approach to assessing cognitive flexibility in schizophrenia, with direct relevance to real-world functional outcomes. Its ability to distinguish sCF from rCF makes it as an encouraging tool for guiding intervention planning and monitoring recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"204 ","pages":"306-314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2026.10.031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: Cognitive flexibility deficits contribute substantially to functional disability in individuals with schizophrenia, yet existing neuropsychological measures remain limited in clinical utility, as they lack ecological connection and rarely distinguish spontaneous (sCF) from reactive (rCF) cognitive flexibility. To address this gap, this study developed and validated the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living-context-based Cognitive Flexibility Assessment (ICFA), a novel instrument designed to separately and simultaneously assess both rCF and sCF in real-life contexts.

Methods: The ICFA was developed based on literature reviews, then content-validated via the Delphi method. Reliability and validity were subsequently examined in a clinical sample of individuals with schizophrenia (n = 112).

Results: The ICFA demonstrated good internal consistencies (Cronbach's α = 0.83 for sCF and 0.86 for rCF) and moderate to good test-retest reliabilities (ICC2,1 = 0.73 for sCF and 0.80 for rCF). Adequate criterion, convergent, discriminant, and ecological validities were also supported by moderate to strong correlations between ICFA scores and conceptually relevant references (ρ = 0.29∼0.78). Furthermore, known-groups validity was established through significantly large differences (Cohen's d = 0.81-1.34, p < 0.001) between propensity score-matched samples of individuals with schizophrenia and healthy controls (n = 54 per group).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that ICFA offers a psychometrically sound and ecologically grounded approach to assessing cognitive flexibility in schizophrenia, with direct relevance to real-world functional outcomes. Its ability to distinguish sCF from rCF makes it as an encouraging tool for guiding intervention planning and monitoring recovery.

ICFA:一种新的基于iadl的精神分裂症患者认知灵活性评估。
背景:认知灵活性缺陷在很大程度上导致了精神分裂症患者的功能性残疾,然而现有的神经心理学测量在临床应用中仍然有限,因为它们缺乏生态联系,并且很少区分自发性(sCF)和反应性(rCF)认知灵活性。为了解决这一差距,本研究开发并验证了基于日常生活情境的认知灵活性评估工具活动(ICFA),这是一种新的工具,旨在分别和同时评估现实生活情境中的rCF和sCF。方法:在文献综述的基础上编制ICFA,并采用德尔菲法进行内容验证。随后在精神分裂症患者的临床样本中检验了信度和效度(n = 112)。结果:ICFA具有良好的内部一致性(sCF的Cronbach's α = 0.83,rCF的0.86)和中等至良好的重测信度(ICC2,1 = 0.73,rCF的0.80)。ICFA评分与概念相关参考文献之间的中度至强相关性也支持了适当的标准效度、收敛效度、判别效度和生态效度(ρ = 0.29 ~ 0.78)。此外,已知组效度通过显着的大差异(Cohen's d = 0.81-1.34,p )来建立。结论:我们的结果表明,ICFA提供了一种心理测量学上合理且基于生态学的方法来评估精神分裂症的认知灵活性,与现实世界的功能结果直接相关。它区分sCF和rCF的能力使其成为指导干预计划和监测恢复的令人鼓舞的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书