Burnout pathway differences across dual-track residency training: a network analysis.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2026-10-13 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1921620
Yuduo Guo, Xiaonan Meng, Sichang Chen, Xiaoning Lan, Haoyuan Guo, Mingchu Li
{"title":"Burnout pathway differences across dual-track residency training: a network analysis.","authors":"Yuduo Guo, Xiaonan Meng, Sichang Chen, Xiaoning Lan, Haoyuan Guo, Mingchu Li","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2026.1921620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>China's standardized residency training operates under a dual-track system: one track integrates clinical training with concurrent degree pursuit (student group), while the other is purely vocational without degree conferral (non-student group). Prior burnout research has largely relied on aggregate total or subscale scores, which cannot detect qualitative differences in symptom-to-symptom connectivity even when mean burnout severity is similar. Despite identical clinical rotations and competency requirements, it remains unclear whether these structurally distinct training pathways are associated with different burnout symptom-connectivity patterns, with direct implications for track-specific educational support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of data from Fan et al.'s previously published cross-sectional survey of 636 residents from a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital. Burnout was measured using the 22-item Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Networks were estimated using Graphical Lasso, and bridge centrality was computed to identify symptoms that most strongly connect burnout dimensions. Analyses were stratified by gender and specialty, and supplemented by logistic regression and bootstrap resampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-students showed higher emotional exhaustion and lower personal accomplishment scores than students, whereas depersonalization scores did not differ significantly between groups. Burnout prevalence was higher among non-students (50.2% vs. 42.4%), but this difference was not statistically significant. In both groups, DP2 (\"I don't really care what happens to patients\") was the dominant bridge node. However, PA4 (\"I don't easily understand how my patients feel\") entered the top five bridge items only in non-students. Three of four subgroups followed the DP2 pathway, whereas non-student males showed a distinct pattern with PA4 as the most prominent feature (BS = 1.445). Logistic regression found no significant association between training identity and burnout status after adjustment (OR = 1.07; ΔAUC = +0.002, <i>p</i> = 0.68), whereas network analyses revealed distinct symptom-connectivity patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that burnout prevention should account for training structure and institutional context. Rather than uniform wellness programs, medical education should offer track-specific support, particularly for residents whose burnout is characterized by empathy-related frustration rather than depersonalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"1921620"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13709981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1921620","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: China's standardized residency training operates under a dual-track system: one track integrates clinical training with concurrent degree pursuit (student group), while the other is purely vocational without degree conferral (non-student group). Prior burnout research has largely relied on aggregate total or subscale scores, which cannot detect qualitative differences in symptom-to-symptom connectivity even when mean burnout severity is similar. Despite identical clinical rotations and competency requirements, it remains unclear whether these structurally distinct training pathways are associated with different burnout symptom-connectivity patterns, with direct implications for track-specific educational support.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from Fan et al.'s previously published cross-sectional survey of 636 residents from a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital. Burnout was measured using the 22-item Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Networks were estimated using Graphical Lasso, and bridge centrality was computed to identify symptoms that most strongly connect burnout dimensions. Analyses were stratified by gender and specialty, and supplemented by logistic regression and bootstrap resampling.

Results: Non-students showed higher emotional exhaustion and lower personal accomplishment scores than students, whereas depersonalization scores did not differ significantly between groups. Burnout prevalence was higher among non-students (50.2% vs. 42.4%), but this difference was not statistically significant. In both groups, DP2 ("I don't really care what happens to patients") was the dominant bridge node. However, PA4 ("I don't easily understand how my patients feel") entered the top five bridge items only in non-students. Three of four subgroups followed the DP2 pathway, whereas non-student males showed a distinct pattern with PA4 as the most prominent feature (BS = 1.445). Logistic regression found no significant association between training identity and burnout status after adjustment (OR = 1.07; ΔAUC = +0.002, p = 0.68), whereas network analyses revealed distinct symptom-connectivity patterns.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that burnout prevention should account for training structure and institutional context. Rather than uniform wellness programs, medical education should offer track-specific support, particularly for residents whose burnout is characterized by empathy-related frustration rather than depersonalization.

双轨住院医师培训的职业倦怠路径差异:网络分析。
背景:中国住院医师规范化培训实行双轨制,一条是临床培训与学位并行(学生组),另一条是纯职业培训,不授予学位(非学生组)。先前的倦怠研究在很大程度上依赖于总总分或子量表得分,即使平均倦怠严重程度相似,也无法检测到症状-症状连通性的质的差异。尽管有相同的临床轮转和能力要求,但这些结构上不同的培训途径是否与不同的倦怠症状-连接模式相关仍不清楚,这对具体的教育支持有直接的影响。方法:我们对Fan等人先前发表的对中国某三级教学医院636名住院医师的横断面调查数据进行了二次分析。工作倦怠采用22项的马斯拉克工作倦怠量表-人力服务调查(MBI-HSS)进行测量。使用图形套索估计网络,并计算桥梁中心性以确定最强烈连接倦怠维度的症状。分析按性别和专业进行分层,并辅以逻辑回归和自举重抽样。结果:非学生的情绪耗竭得分高于学生,个人成就感得分低于学生,而去人格化得分在组间差异不显著。非学生的职业倦怠患病率较高(50.2%比42.4%),但差异无统计学意义。在两组中,DP2(“我真的不在乎病人发生了什么”)是主要的桥结。然而,PA4(“我不容易理解我的病人的感受”)仅在非学生中进入前五名。四个亚组中有三个遵循DP2途径,而非学生男性则表现出以PA4为最显著特征的独特模式(BS = 1.445)。Logistic回归发现调整后训练认同与倦怠状态之间无显著关联(OR = 1.07;ΔAUC = +0.002,p = 0.68),而网络分析显示明显的症状连接模式。结论:这些研究结果表明,职业倦怠预防应考虑培训结构和机构背景。医学教育不应该提供统一的健康项目,而应该提供具体的支持,特别是对于那些因移情相关的沮丧而不是人格解体而倦怠的住院医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书