Joaquim J Ferreira, Fabrizio Stocchi, Angelo Antonini, Olivier Rascol, Nicola Pavese, Georg Ebersbach, Jaime Kulisevsky, Günter Höglinger, Daniel Ramos, José Francisco Rocha, Helena C Brigas, Joerg Holenz, Werner Poewe
{"title":"Long-term safety profile of opicapone in patients with Parkinson's disease and early fluctuations.","authors":"Joaquim J Ferreira, Fabrizio Stocchi, Angelo Antonini, Olivier Rascol, Nicola Pavese, Georg Ebersbach, Jaime Kulisevsky, Günter Höglinger, Daniel Ramos, José Francisco Rocha, Helena C Brigas, Joerg Holenz, Werner Poewe","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2026.1920359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motor fluctuations frequently emerge within the first few years of levodopa treatment in Parkinson's disease (PD), increasing symptom burden and treatment complexity. While opicapone is an established adjunct therapy for motor fluctuations, its safety profile when initiated early in the course of fluctuating disease remains incompletely characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pooled <i>post-hoc</i> analysis integrated individual patient-level data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of opicapone 50 mg and their open-label extensions. Analyses focused on patients with recent onset of motor fluctuations (≤2 years). Safety outcomes included the incidence, severity, timing, and evolution of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during double-blind and up to 1 year of open-label exposure, with comparisons between earlier (OPC-OPC) and delayed (PLC-OPC) initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 269 patients with recent motor fluctuations were included, of whom 228 entered open-label treatment. During the double-blind phase, TEAEs were reported in 55.9% of patients receiving opicapone and 50.9% receiving placebo, with no statistically significant difference between groups. Adverse events were mainly mild to moderate and occurred predominantly within the first 2-3 weeks declining thereafter. Dyskinesia was the most frequent TEAE (10.2% vs. 3.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.09), occurring early and resolving in most patients, either spontaneously or following modest levodopa dose adjustment. Across the combined study period, overall TEAE incidence and cumulative dyskinesia rates were comparable between early and delayed initiation groups (15.3% vs. 15.5%, <i>p</i> = 1.0), with no increase over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opicapone demonstrated a favorable and consistent safety profile in patients with recent onset of motor fluctuations, with adverse events predominantly transient and manageable. Earlier initiation was not associated with an increased safety burden and showed numerically lower rates of overall TEAEs and dyskinesia compared with broader trial populations. These findings support the hypothesis that early optimization of levodopa therapy with opicapone does not accelerate the development of motor complications, supporting early COMT-inhibition in fluctuating PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1920359"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13711507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1920359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Motor fluctuations frequently emerge within the first few years of levodopa treatment in Parkinson's disease (PD), increasing symptom burden and treatment complexity. While opicapone is an established adjunct therapy for motor fluctuations, its safety profile when initiated early in the course of fluctuating disease remains incompletely characterized.
Methods: This pooled post-hoc analysis integrated individual patient-level data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of opicapone 50 mg and their open-label extensions. Analyses focused on patients with recent onset of motor fluctuations (≤2 years). Safety outcomes included the incidence, severity, timing, and evolution of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during double-blind and up to 1 year of open-label exposure, with comparisons between earlier (OPC-OPC) and delayed (PLC-OPC) initiation.
Results: A total of 269 patients with recent motor fluctuations were included, of whom 228 entered open-label treatment. During the double-blind phase, TEAEs were reported in 55.9% of patients receiving opicapone and 50.9% receiving placebo, with no statistically significant difference between groups. Adverse events were mainly mild to moderate and occurred predominantly within the first 2-3 weeks declining thereafter. Dyskinesia was the most frequent TEAE (10.2% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.09), occurring early and resolving in most patients, either spontaneously or following modest levodopa dose adjustment. Across the combined study period, overall TEAE incidence and cumulative dyskinesia rates were comparable between early and delayed initiation groups (15.3% vs. 15.5%, p = 1.0), with no increase over time.
Conclusion: Opicapone demonstrated a favorable and consistent safety profile in patients with recent onset of motor fluctuations, with adverse events predominantly transient and manageable. Earlier initiation was not associated with an increased safety burden and showed numerically lower rates of overall TEAEs and dyskinesia compared with broader trial populations. These findings support the hypothesis that early optimization of levodopa therapy with opicapone does not accelerate the development of motor complications, supporting early COMT-inhibition in fluctuating PD.
背景:在帕金森病(PD)左旋多巴治疗的最初几年内,运动波动经常出现,增加了症状负担和治疗复杂性。虽然阿picapone是一种治疗运动波动的辅助疗法,但在波动性疾病的早期开始使用时,其安全性仍不完全确定。方法:这项合并的事后分析整合了两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的阿picapone 50 mg及其开放标签扩展试验的个体患者水平数据。分析的重点是最近出现运动波动的患者(≤2 年)。安全性指标包括在双盲和长达1 年的开放标签暴露期间,治疗中出现的不良事件(teae)的发生率、严重程度、时间和演变,并比较了早期(OPC-OPC)和延迟(PLC-OPC)开始的情况。结果:共纳入269例近期运动波动患者,其中228例接受开放标签治疗。在双盲期,阿匹卡彭组55.9%的患者报告teae,安慰剂组50.9%的患者报告teae,组间差异无统计学意义。不良事件主要为轻至中度,主要发生在前2-3周 内,此后逐渐减少。运动障碍是最常见的TEAE (10.2% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.09),在大多数患者中早期发生并消退,要么自发发生,要么适度调整左旋多巴剂量。在整个联合研究期间,TEAE的总发病率和累积运动障碍率在早期和延迟启动组之间具有可比性(15.3% vs. 15.5%, p = 1.0),没有随时间增加。结论:Opicapone在近期发作的运动波动患者中表现出良好和一致的安全性,不良事件主要是短暂的和可控的。与更广泛的试验人群相比,更早开始治疗与安全负担增加无关,并且总体teae和运动障碍的发生率在数字上较低。这些发现支持了一种假设,即早期优化左旋多巴治疗阿匹卡酮不会加速运动并发症的发展,支持波动性PD患者早期comt抑制。
期刊介绍:
The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.