Advances in the treatment of intracranial blood blister-like aneurysms: a comprehensive review from surgical approaches to endovascular therapy.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2026-10-13 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2026.1952908
Ganghua Feng, Yuanbiao Lei, Yi Zhang, Qiuli Li, Fuyong Ou, Le Zhang, Xiaoxi Yao
{"title":"Advances in the treatment of intracranial blood blister-like aneurysms: a comprehensive review from surgical approaches to endovascular therapy.","authors":"Ganghua Feng, Yuanbiao Lei, Yi Zhang, Qiuli Li, Fuyong Ou, Le Zhang, Xiaoxi Yao","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2026.1952908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intracranial blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) constitute a rare but clinically challenging subset of cerebrovascular lesions, distinguished by their fragile, thin-walled morphology and a tendency to arise at non-branching sites of intracranial arteries, most frequently in the supraclinoid segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Managing BBAs is particularly difficult due to their high propensity for rupture, rapid progression, and the challenges they pose in intraoperative identification and repair. Traditional surgical approaches, including direct clipping, wrapping, and bypass with trapping, have been employed; however, these techniques are often associated with high complication rates and technical limitations given the delicate structure of BBAs. In recent years, advances in endovascular therapy, such as stent-assisted coiling (SAC) and flow-diverter (FD) placement, have expanded the therapeutic options, offering less invasive alternatives with encouraging outcomes. Nevertheless, the optimal management strategy remains controversial, as both surgical and endovascular approaches carry distinct indications, technical challenges, and risks of recurrence or procedural complications. This narrative review systematically explores the epidemiology and pathophysiology of BBAs, delineates key diagnostic features, and critically examines both reconstructive and deconstructive treatment modalities within a stepwise, two-pathway (endovascular and surgical) algorithm, highlighting reported efficacy, complication profiles, and recommended treatment selection for distinct aneurysm subtypes. By contrasting the strengths and limitations of each approach, this article aims to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance to support individualized management strategies for patients with BBAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1952908"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13711506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1952908","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intracranial blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) constitute a rare but clinically challenging subset of cerebrovascular lesions, distinguished by their fragile, thin-walled morphology and a tendency to arise at non-branching sites of intracranial arteries, most frequently in the supraclinoid segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Managing BBAs is particularly difficult due to their high propensity for rupture, rapid progression, and the challenges they pose in intraoperative identification and repair. Traditional surgical approaches, including direct clipping, wrapping, and bypass with trapping, have been employed; however, these techniques are often associated with high complication rates and technical limitations given the delicate structure of BBAs. In recent years, advances in endovascular therapy, such as stent-assisted coiling (SAC) and flow-diverter (FD) placement, have expanded the therapeutic options, offering less invasive alternatives with encouraging outcomes. Nevertheless, the optimal management strategy remains controversial, as both surgical and endovascular approaches carry distinct indications, technical challenges, and risks of recurrence or procedural complications. This narrative review systematically explores the epidemiology and pathophysiology of BBAs, delineates key diagnostic features, and critically examines both reconstructive and deconstructive treatment modalities within a stepwise, two-pathway (endovascular and surgical) algorithm, highlighting reported efficacy, complication profiles, and recommended treatment selection for distinct aneurysm subtypes. By contrasting the strengths and limitations of each approach, this article aims to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance to support individualized management strategies for patients with BBAs.

颅内血泡样动脉瘤的治疗进展:从手术入路到血管内治疗的综合综述。
颅内血泡样动脉瘤(BBAs)是一种罕见但临床上具有挑战性的脑血管病变,其特点是其脆弱,薄壁形态,并且倾向于出现在颅内动脉的非分支部位,最常见于颈内动脉(ICA)的上颈突段。由于其破裂倾向高,进展迅速,并且对术中识别和修复构成挑战,因此处理BBAs尤其困难。传统的手术入路,包括直接夹持、包裹和搭桥夹持;然而,这些技术往往伴随着高并发症率和技术上的限制。近年来,血管内治疗的进展,如支架辅助盘绕(SAC)和血流分流器(FD)放置,扩大了治疗选择,提供了侵入性较小的替代方案,结果令人鼓舞。然而,最佳的治疗策略仍然存在争议,因为手术和血管内入路都有不同的适应症、技术挑战和复发或手术并发症的风险。本文系统地探讨了BBAs的流行病学和病理生理学,描述了关键的诊断特征,并在逐步的双途径(血管内和手术)算法中严格检查了重建和解构治疗方式,突出了报道的疗效、并发症概况和针对不同动脉瘤亚型的推荐治疗选择。通过对比每种方法的优势和局限性,本文旨在为临床医生提供基于证据的指导,以支持BBAs患者的个性化管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书