Whole-phase DCE-MRI radiomics for differentiating benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: a comparative machine learning study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yantao Yang, Xuewei Ding, Ruixuan Wang, Shiwei Wang, Mengxin Liu, Huan Lu
{"title":"Whole-phase DCE-MRI radiomics for differentiating benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: a comparative machine learning study.","authors":"Yantao Yang, Xuewei Ding, Ruixuan Wang, Shiwei Wang, Mengxin Liu, Huan Lu","doi":"10.1186/s12880-026-02609-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 breast lesions have a wide probability of malignancy, with substantial overlap in imaging findings between benign and malignant lesions. Whole-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) radiomics may provide information on tumor enhancement and heterogeneity. This study primarily aimed to evaluate whole-phase DCE-MRI radiomics for differentiating benign from malignant BI-RADS 4 breast lesions and secondarily explored its feasibility for HER-2 status prediction in malignant lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 484 women with BI-RADS 4 breast lesions who underwent DCE-MRI at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University between January 2022 and October 2024, including 264 benign and 220 malignant lesions. Among the malignant lesions, 52 were HER-2 positive and 168 were HER-2 negative. Patients were randomly divided into training and internal test sets at a ratio of 7:3. Whole-phase DCE-MRI radiomics features were extracted. Eight machine-learning algorithms were used to build radiomics models, clinical models, and combined models. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1 score. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed as an exploratory assessment of potential net benefit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For differentiating benign from malignant BI-RADS 4 lesions, the support vector machine (SVM) radiomics model achieved the best radiomics performance, with a test-set AUC of 0.893. The combined model further improved the AUC to 0.913. In the secondary exploratory HER-2 analysis, the random forest (RF) radiomics model yielded a test-set AUC of 0.879, whereas the combined model showed a lower AUC of 0.830. Owing to the limited number of HER-2-positive cases and the internal validation design, these HER-2 findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whole-phase DCE-MRI radiomics showed favorable internal performance for differentiating benign from malignant BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. The SVM-based combined model performed favorably for the primary malignancy task, whereas the HER-2 analysis should be regarded only as a secondary exploratory observation requiring further validation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not applicable. This was a retrospective single-center imaging study and did not prospectively assign participants to any intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13715199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02609-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 breast lesions have a wide probability of malignancy, with substantial overlap in imaging findings between benign and malignant lesions. Whole-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) radiomics may provide information on tumor enhancement and heterogeneity. This study primarily aimed to evaluate whole-phase DCE-MRI radiomics for differentiating benign from malignant BI-RADS 4 breast lesions and secondarily explored its feasibility for HER-2 status prediction in malignant lesions.

Methods: This retrospective study included 484 women with BI-RADS 4 breast lesions who underwent DCE-MRI at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University between January 2022 and October 2024, including 264 benign and 220 malignant lesions. Among the malignant lesions, 52 were HER-2 positive and 168 were HER-2 negative. Patients were randomly divided into training and internal test sets at a ratio of 7:3. Whole-phase DCE-MRI radiomics features were extracted. Eight machine-learning algorithms were used to build radiomics models, clinical models, and combined models. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1 score. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed as an exploratory assessment of potential net benefit.

Results: For differentiating benign from malignant BI-RADS 4 lesions, the support vector machine (SVM) radiomics model achieved the best radiomics performance, with a test-set AUC of 0.893. The combined model further improved the AUC to 0.913. In the secondary exploratory HER-2 analysis, the random forest (RF) radiomics model yielded a test-set AUC of 0.879, whereas the combined model showed a lower AUC of 0.830. Owing to the limited number of HER-2-positive cases and the internal validation design, these HER-2 findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating.

Conclusions: Whole-phase DCE-MRI radiomics showed favorable internal performance for differentiating benign from malignant BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. The SVM-based combined model performed favorably for the primary malignancy task, whereas the HER-2 analysis should be regarded only as a secondary exploratory observation requiring further validation.

Trial registration: Not applicable. This was a retrospective single-center imaging study and did not prospectively assign participants to any intervention.

鉴别BI-RADS 4乳腺良恶性病变的全期DCE-MRI放射组学:一项比较机器学习研究
背景:乳腺影像学报告与数据系统(BI-RADS)第4类乳腺病变有很大的恶性可能性,良、恶性病变的影像学表现有很大的重叠。全期动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)放射组学可以提供肿瘤增强和异质性的信息。本研究主要旨在评估全期DCE-MRI放射组学对乳腺BI-RADS 4良恶性病变的鉴别价值,并探讨其在恶性病变中HER-2状态预测的可行性。方法:对2022年1月至2024年10月在浙江中医药大学第一附属医院行DCE-MRI检查的484例BI-RADS 4型乳腺病变患者进行回顾性研究,其中良性病变264例,恶性病变220例。恶性病变中HER-2阳性52例,HER-2阴性168例。患者按7:3的比例随机分为训练组和内测组。提取全期DCE-MRI放射组学特征。使用8种机器学习算法构建放射组学模型、临床模型和组合模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和F1评分来评价模型的性能。决策曲线分析(DCA)作为潜在净效益的探索性评估。结果:对于BI-RADS 4良恶性病变的鉴别,支持向量机(SVM)放射组学模型的放射组学性能最好,测试集AUC为0.893。联合模型进一步将AUC提高到0.913。在二次探索性HER-2分析中,随机森林(RF)放射组学模型的测试集AUC为0.879,而联合模型的AUC较低,为0.830。由于HER-2阳性病例数量有限和内部验证设计,这些HER-2发现应被解释为初步和假设生成。结论:全期DCE-MRI放射组学在鉴别BI-RADS 4乳腺良恶性病变方面具有良好的内在性能。基于svm的联合模型在原发性恶性肿瘤任务中表现良好,而HER-2分析应被视为次要的探索性观察,需要进一步验证。试验注册:不适用。这是一项回顾性单中心影像学研究,没有前瞻性地分配参与者进行任何干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书