An Audit on the Management of Adult Patients With Renal Colic Presenting to the Emergency Department.

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2026-10-24 eCollection Date: 2026-10-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.118507
Heba M Ahmed, Sara E Almheiri, Esra M Aldarmaki, Reem S Al Thehli, Khawla S Abdulrahman, Shahla K Al Marrawi, Neena A Roy, Tamadur A El Shikhidris, Maha E Aljaberi, Maryam Al Nuaimi, Nasser Ahmed, Kenneth C Dittrich, Ismail Mohamed Al Ramahi, Hasan Qayyum
{"title":"An Audit on the Management of Adult Patients With Renal Colic Presenting to the Emergency Department.","authors":"Heba M Ahmed, Sara E Almheiri, Esra M Aldarmaki, Reem S Al Thehli, Khawla S Abdulrahman, Shahla K Al Marrawi, Neena A Roy, Tamadur A El Shikhidris, Maha E Aljaberi, Maryam Al Nuaimi, Nasser Ahmed, Kenneth C Dittrich, Ismail Mohamed Al Ramahi, Hasan Qayyum","doi":"10.7759/cureus.118507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong> Renal colic is a common emergency department presentation requiring timely assessment, appropriate analgesia, and investigation. This clinical audit evaluated adherence to predefined standards for pain assessment, timely analgesia, investigations, imaging, and medication selection, and assessed changes in practice following a structured implementation phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A retrospective, single-center, two-cycle clinical audit was conducted in an adult emergency department. The primary audit included 100 patients presenting between December 2020 and December 2024, and the re-audit included 100 patients presenting between March and September 2025, giving a total sample of 200 patients. Nine audit criteria were derived from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. Following the primary audit, departmental education, audit feedback, an educational infographic, and a standardized renal colic analgesia pathway were implemented. Categorical outcomes were reported as frequencies and percentages and compared between audit cycles using two-sided Chi-square or Fisher exact tests, as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> First-line nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) administration increased from 39/100 patients (39.0%) in the primary audit to 60/100 patients (60.0%) in the re-audit, representing an absolute increase of 21.0 percentage points (95% CI: 7.5-34.5). This difference was statistically significant (χ²(1, N = 200) = 8.00; p = 0.005). Avoidance of first-line opioid administration increased from 89/100 patients (89.0%) to 94/100 patients (94.0%); however, this difference was not statistically significant (χ²(1, N = 200) = 1.03; p = 0.310). Pain-score documentation, timely analgesia, urine dipstick testing, laboratory investigations, computed tomography (CT) imaging, and avoidance of antispasmodic medication remained broadly consistent between the two audit cycles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Following implementation of a standardized renal colic pathway, departmental education, an educational infographic, and audit feedback, first-line NSAID use increased significantly and first-line opioid use decreased. Other key measures of assessment, investigation, and analgesic care remained generally stable between audit cycles. These findings support the value of a structured departmental approach to promoting guideline-concordant analgesic prescribing and provide a basis for continued quality-improvement activity and future re-audit.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"18 10","pages":"e118507"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13696062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.118507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:  Renal colic is a common emergency department presentation requiring timely assessment, appropriate analgesia, and investigation. This clinical audit evaluated adherence to predefined standards for pain assessment, timely analgesia, investigations, imaging, and medication selection, and assessed changes in practice following a structured implementation phase.

Methods:  A retrospective, single-center, two-cycle clinical audit was conducted in an adult emergency department. The primary audit included 100 patients presenting between December 2020 and December 2024, and the re-audit included 100 patients presenting between March and September 2025, giving a total sample of 200 patients. Nine audit criteria were derived from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. Following the primary audit, departmental education, audit feedback, an educational infographic, and a standardized renal colic analgesia pathway were implemented. Categorical outcomes were reported as frequencies and percentages and compared between audit cycles using two-sided Chi-square or Fisher exact tests, as appropriate.

Results:  First-line nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) administration increased from 39/100 patients (39.0%) in the primary audit to 60/100 patients (60.0%) in the re-audit, representing an absolute increase of 21.0 percentage points (95% CI: 7.5-34.5). This difference was statistically significant (χ²(1, N = 200) = 8.00; p = 0.005). Avoidance of first-line opioid administration increased from 89/100 patients (89.0%) to 94/100 patients (94.0%); however, this difference was not statistically significant (χ²(1, N = 200) = 1.03; p = 0.310). Pain-score documentation, timely analgesia, urine dipstick testing, laboratory investigations, computed tomography (CT) imaging, and avoidance of antispasmodic medication remained broadly consistent between the two audit cycles.

Conclusion:  Following implementation of a standardized renal colic pathway, departmental education, an educational infographic, and audit feedback, first-line NSAID use increased significantly and first-line opioid use decreased. Other key measures of assessment, investigation, and analgesic care remained generally stable between audit cycles. These findings support the value of a structured departmental approach to promoting guideline-concordant analgesic prescribing and provide a basis for continued quality-improvement activity and future re-audit.

急诊成人肾绞痛患者处理审计
简介:肾绞痛是一种常见的急诊科表现,需要及时评估,适当的镇痛和检查。本次临床审核评估了对疼痛评估、及时镇痛、检查、成像和药物选择等预先确定的标准的遵守情况,并评估了结构化实施阶段后实践中的变化。方法:对1例成人急诊科进行回顾性、单中心、两周期临床审核。初次审计包括100例在2020年12月至2024年12月期间就诊的患者,重新审计包括100例在2025年3月至9月期间就诊的患者,共200例患者。9项审核标准来源于皇家急诊医学院(RCEM)和国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)指南。初步审核后,实施了部门教育、审核反馈、教育信息图和标准化肾绞痛镇痛途径。分类结果以频率和百分比报告,并酌情使用双侧卡方检验或Fisher精确检验在审计周期之间进行比较。结果:一线非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)给药率从初次审核时的39/100例(39.0%)增加到二次审核时的60/100例(60.0%),绝对增加了21.0个百分点(95% CI: 7.5-34.5)。差异有统计学意义(χ 2 (1, N = 200) = 8.00;P = 0.005)。一线阿片类药物回避率从89/100例(89.0%)上升至94/100例(94.0%);但差异无统计学意义(χ 2 (1, N = 200) = 1.03;P = 0.310)。在两个审计周期中,疼痛评分记录、及时镇痛、尿试纸测试、实验室检查、计算机断层扫描(CT)成像和避免使用抗痉挛药物大致保持一致。结论:在实施标准化的肾绞痛路径、部门教育、教育信息图和审计反馈后,一线非甾体抗炎药的使用显著增加,一线阿片类药物的使用减少。其他评估、调查和镇痛护理的关键措施在审计周期之间基本保持稳定。这些发现支持了结构化部门方法的价值,以促进与指南一致的镇痛处方,并为持续的质量改进活动和未来的重新审计提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书