Perceived Simulation Design Quality, Educational Effectiveness, Satisfaction, and Self-Confidence in a Resource-Conscious Burn Care Simulation: A Multicentre Observational Study.
William Meschial, Muriel Fernanda de Lima, Luciene Andrade, Alice Nespollo, Isadora Cardias, Cristiane Siebeneichler, Sandra Marin, Julia Bitencourt, Denise Zocche
{"title":"Perceived Simulation Design Quality, Educational Effectiveness, Satisfaction, and Self-Confidence in a Resource-Conscious Burn Care Simulation: A Multicentre Observational Study.","authors":"William Meschial, Muriel Fernanda de Lima, Luciene Andrade, Alice Nespollo, Isadora Cardias, Cristiane Siebeneichler, Sandra Marin, Julia Bitencourt, Denise Zocche","doi":"10.3390/ebj7040052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Early recognition and management of burns are essential, yet access to technologically complex simulation may be limited in resource-constrained educational settings. <b>Methods:</b> We developed a resource-conscious simulation scenario for the initial management of adult burns, established its content validity, and evaluated its implementation across three Brazilian public universities. Nine experts assessed content validity, and post-intervention evaluation included 48 nursing students. Perceived simulation design quality, perceived educational effectiveness, satisfaction, and self-confidence were measured. <b>Results:</b> The scenario demonstrated adequate content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.86). Median scores were 4.60/5.0 for design quality, 2.63/3.0 for perceived educational effectiveness, 4.80/5.0 for satisfaction, and 4.38/5.0 for self-confidence. Perceived design quality correlated positively with perceived effectiveness (ρ = 0.557; 95% CI 0.317-0.731), satisfaction (ρ = 0.711; 95% CI 0.529-0.831), and self-confidence (ρ = 0.612; 95% CI 0.390-0.767; all <i>p</i> < 0.001). After adjustment for age, region, and previous simulation experience, each one-point increase in design rating remained associated with a 0.43-point increase in perceived effectiveness (95% CI 0.17-0.69; <i>p</i> = 0.002). <b>Conclusions:</b> Higher perceived design quality was associated with more favourable self-reported educational outcomes. The scenario was implemented across three institutions, but its effects on knowledge and clinical performance require further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13692479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj7040052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Early recognition and management of burns are essential, yet access to technologically complex simulation may be limited in resource-constrained educational settings. Methods: We developed a resource-conscious simulation scenario for the initial management of adult burns, established its content validity, and evaluated its implementation across three Brazilian public universities. Nine experts assessed content validity, and post-intervention evaluation included 48 nursing students. Perceived simulation design quality, perceived educational effectiveness, satisfaction, and self-confidence were measured. Results: The scenario demonstrated adequate content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.86). Median scores were 4.60/5.0 for design quality, 2.63/3.0 for perceived educational effectiveness, 4.80/5.0 for satisfaction, and 4.38/5.0 for self-confidence. Perceived design quality correlated positively with perceived effectiveness (ρ = 0.557; 95% CI 0.317-0.731), satisfaction (ρ = 0.711; 95% CI 0.529-0.831), and self-confidence (ρ = 0.612; 95% CI 0.390-0.767; all p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, region, and previous simulation experience, each one-point increase in design rating remained associated with a 0.43-point increase in perceived effectiveness (95% CI 0.17-0.69; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Higher perceived design quality was associated with more favourable self-reported educational outcomes. The scenario was implemented across three institutions, but its effects on knowledge and clinical performance require further evaluation.
背景:烧伤的早期识别和管理是必不可少的,然而,在资源有限的教育环境中,技术复杂的模拟可能受到限制。方法:我们开发了一个资源意识模拟场景,用于成人烧伤的初始管理,建立了其内容有效性,并评估了其在巴西三所公立大学的实施情况。9位专家评估内容效度,干预后评估48名护生。测量了感知模拟设计质量、感知教育有效性、满意度和自信心。结果:该方案具有足够的内容效度(S-CVI/Ave = 0.86)。设计质量中位数为4.60/5.0,感知教育效果中位数为2.63/3.0,满意度中位数为4.80/5.0,自信中位数为4.38/5.0。感知设计质量与感知有效性(ρ = 0.557; 95% CI 0.317-0.731)、满意度(ρ = 0.711; 95% CI 0.529-0.831)和自信心(ρ = 0.612; 95% CI 0.390-0.767;均p < 0.001)呈正相关。在调整了年龄、地区和以前的模拟经验后,设计评分每增加1分,感知有效性增加0.43分(95% CI 0.17-0.69; p = 0.002)。结论:较高的感知设计质量与更有利的自我报告教育结果相关。该方案在三家机构实施,但其对知识和临床表现的影响需要进一步评估。