Playing It Differently: Using Performance-Based Interviewing to Engage Children in Healthcare Research.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Claire Treadgold, Jessica Nikolovski, Valsamma Eapen, Vasiliki Koutoulas, Constance Smith, Sarah Elliott, Lynn McCartney, Barb Vernon, Karlen R Barr, Dianna Smith-McCue, Les White
{"title":"Playing It Differently: Using Performance-Based Interviewing to Engage Children in Healthcare Research.","authors":"Claire Treadgold, Jessica Nikolovski, Valsamma Eapen, Vasiliki Koutoulas, Constance Smith, Sarah Elliott, Lynn McCartney, Barb Vernon, Karlen R Barr, Dianna Smith-McCue, Les White","doi":"10.1111/hex.70922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/background: </strong>Capturing children's healthcare experiences remains inherently challenging. Traditional interview approaches are often poorly suited to younger populations and their developmental needs, limiting opportunities for them to meaningfully express their perspectives. This can result in children's voices being underrepresented in research and healthcare. To address this concern, we trialled a novel, child-centred methodology, using professional performers trained in engaging hospitalised children ('Captain Starlight'). The approach was implemented within a national paediatric patient-reported experience measure (pPREM) development project, which served as a case study for the application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examines a child-centred data collection methodology and documents the process, benefits and challenges of a creative interviewing approach designed to engage children in qualitative research. The methodology was implemented during a larger project to co-design a pPREM, which serves as context for this case study. Professional performers ('Captain Starlights', herein 'Captains'), trained in child-centred communication, conducted semi-structured interviews while remaining in character as visitors from another planet who are unfamiliar with hospitals. This mythology aimed to position children as the 'experts,' encouraging them to explain what matters most during hospital experiences. Interviews incorporated play, storytelling, and age-appropriate activities to facilitate engagement. To understand the usefulness of this approach, we conducted follow-up qualitative interviews with Captains and used reflexive thematic analysis to explore how the method shaped interactions and data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The creative interviewing approach enabled flexible, child-led interactions, with Captains adapting their communication styles to suit the child's age, personality, and context. The use of play and character-driven narrative helped overcome children's unfamiliarity with providing formal feedback, fostering openness and sustained engagement. However, challenges included balancing character immersion with data collection, navigating consent processes, and maintaining clarity around the interviewer's role.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This novel interviewing methodology demonstrates how playful, imaginative approaches can facilitate meaningful engagement with children in healthcare research, enabling richer insights into their experiences. The approach created a safe and empowering environment in which children could articulate their needs and preferences. It forms part of a broader multi-stage project to co-develop a paediatric PREM, with this context allowing the methodology to be successfully piloted as a transferable approach for engaging children in healthcare research.</p><p><strong>Patient/public contribution: </strong>While this methodological study did not directly involve patients in its evaluation, it is embedded within a larger co-design project centred on capturing children's voices to develop a paediatric patient-reported experience measure (pPREM). JN served as the patient and community representative for the pPREM project and this study, contributing a lived-experience lens to the research and providing qualitative methodological oversight to support patient-centred study design, analysis, and interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"29 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13700104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70922","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/background: Capturing children's healthcare experiences remains inherently challenging. Traditional interview approaches are often poorly suited to younger populations and their developmental needs, limiting opportunities for them to meaningfully express their perspectives. This can result in children's voices being underrepresented in research and healthcare. To address this concern, we trialled a novel, child-centred methodology, using professional performers trained in engaging hospitalised children ('Captain Starlight'). The approach was implemented within a national paediatric patient-reported experience measure (pPREM) development project, which served as a case study for the application.

Methods: This study examines a child-centred data collection methodology and documents the process, benefits and challenges of a creative interviewing approach designed to engage children in qualitative research. The methodology was implemented during a larger project to co-design a pPREM, which serves as context for this case study. Professional performers ('Captain Starlights', herein 'Captains'), trained in child-centred communication, conducted semi-structured interviews while remaining in character as visitors from another planet who are unfamiliar with hospitals. This mythology aimed to position children as the 'experts,' encouraging them to explain what matters most during hospital experiences. Interviews incorporated play, storytelling, and age-appropriate activities to facilitate engagement. To understand the usefulness of this approach, we conducted follow-up qualitative interviews with Captains and used reflexive thematic analysis to explore how the method shaped interactions and data collection.

Results: The creative interviewing approach enabled flexible, child-led interactions, with Captains adapting their communication styles to suit the child's age, personality, and context. The use of play and character-driven narrative helped overcome children's unfamiliarity with providing formal feedback, fostering openness and sustained engagement. However, challenges included balancing character immersion with data collection, navigating consent processes, and maintaining clarity around the interviewer's role.

Conclusion: This novel interviewing methodology demonstrates how playful, imaginative approaches can facilitate meaningful engagement with children in healthcare research, enabling richer insights into their experiences. The approach created a safe and empowering environment in which children could articulate their needs and preferences. It forms part of a broader multi-stage project to co-develop a paediatric PREM, with this context allowing the methodology to be successfully piloted as a transferable approach for engaging children in healthcare research.

Patient/public contribution: While this methodological study did not directly involve patients in its evaluation, it is embedded within a larger co-design project centred on capturing children's voices to develop a paediatric patient-reported experience measure (pPREM). JN served as the patient and community representative for the pPREM project and this study, contributing a lived-experience lens to the research and providing qualitative methodological oversight to support patient-centred study design, analysis, and interpretation.

以不同的方式玩:使用基于表现的访谈来吸引儿童参与医疗保健研究。
介绍/背景:捕捉儿童的医疗保健经验本质上仍然具有挑战性。传统的面试方式往往不适合年轻人和他们的发展需求,限制了他们有意义地表达自己观点的机会。这可能导致儿童的声音在研究和保健中没有得到充分的代表。为了解决这一问题,我们尝试了一种新颖的、以儿童为中心的方法,使用经过住院儿童培训的专业表演者(“星光船长”)。该方法是在国家儿科患者报告经验措施(pPREM)开发项目中实施的,该项目作为应用的案例研究。方法:本研究考察了以儿童为中心的数据收集方法,并记录了旨在让儿童参与定性研究的创造性访谈方法的过程、好处和挑战。该方法是在一个更大的项目中实现的,以共同设计pPREM,作为本案例研究的上下文。专业表演者(“星光船长”,以下简称“船长”)接受过以儿童为中心的沟通培训,在扮演不熟悉医院的另一个星球访客的角色时,进行了半结构化访谈。这种神话旨在将儿童定位为“专家”,鼓励他们解释医院经历中最重要的事情。访谈结合了游戏、讲故事和适合年龄的活动来促进参与。为了了解这种方法的有效性,我们对船长进行了后续定性访谈,并使用反身性主题分析来探索该方法如何影响互动和数据收集。结果:创造性的访谈方法实现了灵活的、以儿童为主导的互动,船长调整了他们的沟通方式,以适应儿童的年龄、个性和环境。使用游戏和角色驱动的叙述有助于克服儿童对提供正式反馈的不熟悉,促进开放性和持续的参与。然而,挑战包括平衡角色沉浸与数据收集,导航同意过程,以及保持采访者角色的清晰度。结论:这种新颖的访谈方法展示了如何有趣,富有想象力的方法可以促进有意义的参与与儿童在医疗保健研究,使更丰富的见解,他们的经验。这种方法创造了一个安全和赋权的环境,使儿童能够阐明他们的需要和偏好。它构成了一个更广泛的多阶段项目的一部分,共同制定儿科PREM,在这种背景下,使该方法能够成功地作为一种可转移的方法进行试点,使儿童参与保健研究。患者/公众贡献:虽然这项方法学研究没有直接让患者参与其评估,但它被嵌入到一个更大的共同设计项目中,该项目以捕捉儿童的声音为中心,以开发儿科患者报告的经验测量(pPREM)。JN担任pPREM项目和本研究的患者和社区代表,为研究提供了现场体验镜头,并提供定性方法监督,以支持以患者为中心的研究设计、分析和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书