Root-induced preferential flow in the critical zone: Observations, processes, mechanisms, and modeling

IF 11.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xiaohe Qian, Guotao Zhang, Peng Cui, Yao Jiang, L. Adrian Bruijnzeel, Jintao Liu, Haiyan Fang, Xinsen Chen, Jian Guo, Chao Ma, Chaoyue Li, Carlo Gualtieri, Nazir Ahmed Bazai, Dongfeng Li, Jiumao Xu, Guilin Han
{"title":"Root-induced preferential flow in the critical zone: Observations, processes, mechanisms, and modeling","authors":"Xiaohe Qian, Guotao Zhang, Peng Cui, Yao Jiang, L. Adrian Bruijnzeel, Jintao Liu, Haiyan Fang, Xinsen Chen, Jian Guo, Chao Ma, Chaoyue Li, Carlo Gualtieri, Nazir Ahmed Bazai, Dongfeng Li, Jiumao Xu, Guilin Han","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2026.105734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Root-induced preferential flow (RPF) is an important form of non-equilibrium water transport in vegetated critical zones, but its identification, controls, and hydrological consequences remain difficult to generalize because root-derived pathways coexist with cracks, faunal burrows, soil pipes, and lithological fractures. This review synthesizes 330 studies to clarify the evidence for root-specific preferential flow and its links to root characteristics, pathway properties, soil structure, and hydrological forcing. Four non-exclusive structural expressions of RPF are identified: shallow root network–dominated preferential flow (SRPF), vertical root-controlled preferential flow (VRPF), interface-guided preferential flow (IRPF), and legacy root-biopore–dominated preferential flow (BRPF). Across the reviewed literature, SRPF was reported most frequently (63.0%), followed by VRPF (56.1%), BRPF (35.8%), and IRPF (17.0%); these frequencies represent literature occurrence rather than ecosystem prevalence. Root architecture, abundance, mortality and decomposition influence pathway formation, whereas pathway connectivity, soil heterogeneity, antecedent wetness, and water-input conditions regulate their hydraulic expression. Consequently, RPF can enhance infiltration and subsurface redistribution, but its effects on storage, groundwater recharge, runoff timing, and peak discharge are context dependent. Apparent threshold-like responses are therefore better interpreted as changes in effective pathway connectivity than as universal rainfall or soil-moisture thresholds. Current understanding remains constrained by limited direct measurements linking root provenance, pathway geometry, connectivity, and flux, and by models that rarely represent the biological origin and temporal evolution of preferential pathways. Stronger root-specific experiments, repeated three-dimensional observations, and dynamic root-informed parameterization are needed to improve representation of RPF across scales.","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2026.105734","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Root-induced preferential flow (RPF) is an important form of non-equilibrium water transport in vegetated critical zones, but its identification, controls, and hydrological consequences remain difficult to generalize because root-derived pathways coexist with cracks, faunal burrows, soil pipes, and lithological fractures. This review synthesizes 330 studies to clarify the evidence for root-specific preferential flow and its links to root characteristics, pathway properties, soil structure, and hydrological forcing. Four non-exclusive structural expressions of RPF are identified: shallow root network–dominated preferential flow (SRPF), vertical root-controlled preferential flow (VRPF), interface-guided preferential flow (IRPF), and legacy root-biopore–dominated preferential flow (BRPF). Across the reviewed literature, SRPF was reported most frequently (63.0%), followed by VRPF (56.1%), BRPF (35.8%), and IRPF (17.0%); these frequencies represent literature occurrence rather than ecosystem prevalence. Root architecture, abundance, mortality and decomposition influence pathway formation, whereas pathway connectivity, soil heterogeneity, antecedent wetness, and water-input conditions regulate their hydraulic expression. Consequently, RPF can enhance infiltration and subsurface redistribution, but its effects on storage, groundwater recharge, runoff timing, and peak discharge are context dependent. Apparent threshold-like responses are therefore better interpreted as changes in effective pathway connectivity than as universal rainfall or soil-moisture thresholds. Current understanding remains constrained by limited direct measurements linking root provenance, pathway geometry, connectivity, and flux, and by models that rarely represent the biological origin and temporal evolution of preferential pathways. Stronger root-specific experiments, repeated three-dimensional observations, and dynamic root-informed parameterization are needed to improve representation of RPF across scales.
临界区根诱导的优先流:观察、过程、机制和建模
根诱导优先流(RPF)是植被临界带非平衡水输送的一种重要形式,但其识别、控制和水文后果仍然难以概括,因为根源路径与裂缝、动物洞穴、土壤管道和岩性裂缝共存。本文综合了330项研究,阐明了根特异性优先流及其与根特征、通道特性、土壤结构和水文强迫之间的联系。确定了四种非排他的RPF结构表达式:浅根网络支配的优先流(SRPF)、垂直根控制的优先流(VRPF)、接口引导的优先流(IRPF)和遗留根生物矿支配的优先流(BRPF)。在所回顾的文献中,SRPF的报道频率最高(63.0%),其次是VRPF(56.1%)、BRPF(35.8%)和IRPF (17.0%);这些频率代表了文献的发生率,而不是生态系统的普遍性。根系构型、丰度、死亡和分解影响通路形成,而通路连通性、土壤异质性、前缘湿度和水输入条件调节其水力表达。因此,RPF可以增强入渗和地下再分配,但其对储水量、地下水补给、径流时间和峰值流量的影响取决于环境。因此,明显的阈值样响应可以更好地解释为有效途径连通性的变化,而不是普遍的降雨量或土壤湿度阈值。目前的理解仍然受到有限的直接测量的限制,这些测量将根的来源、通路的几何形状、连通性和通量联系起来,而且模型很少能代表优先通路的生物起源和时间进化。需要更强的根特异性实验、重复的三维观测和动态的根信息参数化来改善跨尺度的RPF表示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书