Identification of genetically supported candidate therapeutic targets for angina pectoris using mendelian randomization.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Zixuan Wang, Dexin Wang, Longke Ran, Guangchao Zang, Lingfang Jiang
{"title":"Identification of genetically supported candidate therapeutic targets for angina pectoris using mendelian randomization.","authors":"Zixuan Wang, Dexin Wang, Longke Ran, Guangchao Zang, Lingfang Jiang","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000051280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Angina pectoris is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome that may reflect obstructive coronary atherosclerosis, coronary vasomotor dysfunction, microvascular dysfunction, or myocardial oxygen supply-demand imbalance. We used Mendelian randomization (MR) to prioritize circulating proteins that may influence the broad risk of angina while distinguishing atherosclerosis-related pathways from other potential mechanisms. This study aimed to identify genetically supported candidate therapeutic targets for angina pectoris and characterize the relative strength and potential mechanisms of the evidence supporting each candidate. The primary analysis combined European cis-protein quantitative trait locus instruments with a broad genome-wide association study -defined angina phenotype. Steiger testing, Bayesian co-localization, phenotypic scanning, external validation, supplementary European trans- protein quantitative trait locus and Asian-ancestry analyses, phenotype-stratified MR, two-step mediation MR, enrichment analysis, bulk RNA-seq, protein-protein interaction analysis, and exploratory single-cell transcriptomic analyses were used to evaluate robustness and biological context. Seven protein-angina associations met the primary Bonferroni threshold; 6 proteins (LPA, TMEM106B, APOA5, TIRAP, PCSK9, and SWAP70) were retained after TGFB1 failed Steiger filtering. Independent external MR supported LPA in UK Biobank and LPA, PCSK9, and APOA5 in FinnGen. Phenotype-stratified analyses generally supported associations across stable angina, unstable angina, coronary artery disease, and myocardial infarction, although instrument availability and the strength of evidence differed among proteins. Two-step MR supported indirect pathways through coronary artery calcification for LPA, through LDL cholesterol for PCSK9, and through triglycerides for APOA5, but not through C-reactive protein for TIRAP. Exploratory single-cell analyses localized TMEM106B, TIRAP, and SWAP70 to relevant vascular and immune cell populations and provided limited, context-dependent functional support. LPA, PCSK9, and APOA5 have the strongest convergent genetic and external-replication evidence and appear to influence angina risk predominantly through atherosclerotic lipid-related pathways. TMEM106B, TIRAP, and SWAP70 remain potentially novel, genetically supported candidates with exploratory cellular evidence but without direct experimental validation. These candidates should not be considered established therapeutic targets until proteomic, functional, rescue, and clinical studies are completed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"105 43","pages":"e51280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13706504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000051280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Angina pectoris is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome that may reflect obstructive coronary atherosclerosis, coronary vasomotor dysfunction, microvascular dysfunction, or myocardial oxygen supply-demand imbalance. We used Mendelian randomization (MR) to prioritize circulating proteins that may influence the broad risk of angina while distinguishing atherosclerosis-related pathways from other potential mechanisms. This study aimed to identify genetically supported candidate therapeutic targets for angina pectoris and characterize the relative strength and potential mechanisms of the evidence supporting each candidate. The primary analysis combined European cis-protein quantitative trait locus instruments with a broad genome-wide association study -defined angina phenotype. Steiger testing, Bayesian co-localization, phenotypic scanning, external validation, supplementary European trans- protein quantitative trait locus and Asian-ancestry analyses, phenotype-stratified MR, two-step mediation MR, enrichment analysis, bulk RNA-seq, protein-protein interaction analysis, and exploratory single-cell transcriptomic analyses were used to evaluate robustness and biological context. Seven protein-angina associations met the primary Bonferroni threshold; 6 proteins (LPA, TMEM106B, APOA5, TIRAP, PCSK9, and SWAP70) were retained after TGFB1 failed Steiger filtering. Independent external MR supported LPA in UK Biobank and LPA, PCSK9, and APOA5 in FinnGen. Phenotype-stratified analyses generally supported associations across stable angina, unstable angina, coronary artery disease, and myocardial infarction, although instrument availability and the strength of evidence differed among proteins. Two-step MR supported indirect pathways through coronary artery calcification for LPA, through LDL cholesterol for PCSK9, and through triglycerides for APOA5, but not through C-reactive protein for TIRAP. Exploratory single-cell analyses localized TMEM106B, TIRAP, and SWAP70 to relevant vascular and immune cell populations and provided limited, context-dependent functional support. LPA, PCSK9, and APOA5 have the strongest convergent genetic and external-replication evidence and appear to influence angina risk predominantly through atherosclerotic lipid-related pathways. TMEM106B, TIRAP, and SWAP70 remain potentially novel, genetically supported candidates with exploratory cellular evidence but without direct experimental validation. These candidates should not be considered established therapeutic targets until proteomic, functional, rescue, and clinical studies are completed.

孟德尔随机化方法鉴定心绞痛基因支持的候选治疗靶点。
心绞痛是一种异质性临床综合征,可能反映阻塞性冠状动脉粥样硬化、冠状动脉血管舒张功能障碍、微血管功能障碍或心肌氧供需失衡。我们使用孟德尔随机化(MR)来优先考虑可能影响心绞痛广泛风险的循环蛋白,同时区分动脉粥样硬化相关途径和其他潜在机制。本研究旨在确定基因支持的心绞痛候选治疗靶点,并描述支持每种候选证据的相对强度和潜在机制。初步分析结合了欧洲顺式蛋白数量性状位点仪器和广泛的全基因组关联研究定义的心绞痛表型。使用Steiger检验、贝叶斯共定位、表型扫描、外部验证、补充欧洲反式蛋白数量性状位点和亚洲血统分析、表型分层MR、两步中介MR、富集分析、大量RNA-seq、蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用分析和探索性单细胞转录组学分析来评估稳健性和生物学背景。7个蛋白-心绞痛关联达到初级Bonferroni阈值;TGFB1 Steiger过滤失败后,保留了6个蛋白(LPA、TMEM106B、APOA5、TIRAP、PCSK9和SWAP70)。独立的外部MR支持UK Biobank中的LPA和FinnGen中的LPA、PCSK9和APOA5。表型分层分析普遍支持稳定型心绞痛、不稳定型心绞痛、冠状动脉疾病和心肌梗死之间的关联,尽管不同蛋白质之间的仪器可用性和证据强度有所不同。两步磁共振支持间接途径,通过冠状动脉钙化的LPA,通过LDL胆固醇的PCSK9,通过甘油三酯的APOA5,但不通过c反应蛋白的TIRAP。探索性单细胞分析将TMEM106B、TIRAP和SWAP70定位到相关的血管和免疫细胞群中,并提供了有限的、依赖于上下文的功能支持。LPA、PCSK9和APOA5具有最强的趋同遗传和外部复制证据,似乎主要通过动脉粥样硬化脂质相关途径影响心绞痛风险。TMEM106B, TIRAP和SWAP70仍然是潜在的新颖的,具有探索性细胞证据的遗传支持候选物,但没有直接的实验验证。在完成蛋白质组学、功能、抢救和临床研究之前,这些候选药物不应被视为确定的治疗靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书