Comparative efficacy of common adjuvant treatments after resection of colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yuzheng Zhou, Qianru Wang, Likun Liu, Xinwen Wang, Meiping Xue, Jie Xu, Jinyang Bai, Xiaojuan Wang
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of common adjuvant treatments after resection of colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Yuzheng Zhou, Qianru Wang, Likun Liu, Xinwen Wang, Meiping Xue, Jie Xu, Jinyang Bai, Xiaojuan Wang","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000051187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although adjuvant strategies such as systemic chemotherapy, regional nonsystemic chemotherapy, and ablation have been applied, the optimal adjuvant therapeutic strategy for resectable colorectal liver metastases remains uncertain in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. This network meta-analysis aimed to determine the optimal adjuvant therapeutic strategy for patients with colorectal liver metastases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched potentially eligible studies in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases until July 2026. Pooled disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using R software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies including 18 reports were included. For the DFS, except for adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (CT, HAIC) concomitant with intravenous CT, adjuvant CT and perioperative CT significantly improved DFS compared with surgery and adjuvant HAIC. There was no statistical difference between all therapeutic strategies for OS. Adjuvant HAIC concomitant with intravenous CT had the highest probability of being the best treatment for improving DFS (85.01%), followed by perioperative CT (11.75%) and adjuvant CT (3.17%); however, adjuvant HAIC concomitant with intravenous CT had the highest probability of being the best adjuvant treatment for improving OS (52.46%), followed by perioperative CT (40.25%) and adjuvant HAIC (5.25%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjuvant CT may be the best for improving DFS, but perioperative CT may be the best for improving OS. However, the results should be validated further.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"105 43","pages":"e51187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13706214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000051187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although adjuvant strategies such as systemic chemotherapy, regional nonsystemic chemotherapy, and ablation have been applied, the optimal adjuvant therapeutic strategy for resectable colorectal liver metastases remains uncertain in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival. This network meta-analysis aimed to determine the optimal adjuvant therapeutic strategy for patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Methods: We searched potentially eligible studies in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases until July 2026. Pooled disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using R software.

Results: Eighteen studies including 18 reports were included. For the DFS, except for adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (CT, HAIC) concomitant with intravenous CT, adjuvant CT and perioperative CT significantly improved DFS compared with surgery and adjuvant HAIC. There was no statistical difference between all therapeutic strategies for OS. Adjuvant HAIC concomitant with intravenous CT had the highest probability of being the best treatment for improving DFS (85.01%), followed by perioperative CT (11.75%) and adjuvant CT (3.17%); however, adjuvant HAIC concomitant with intravenous CT had the highest probability of being the best adjuvant treatment for improving OS (52.46%), followed by perioperative CT (40.25%) and adjuvant HAIC (5.25%).

Conclusion: Adjuvant CT may be the best for improving DFS, but perioperative CT may be the best for improving OS. However, the results should be validated further.

结直肠肝转移瘤切除术后常用辅助治疗的比较疗效:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。
背景:虽然全身化疗、局部非全身化疗和消融术等辅助治疗策略已被应用,但对于可切除的结直肠肝转移的最佳辅助治疗策略在总生存期和无病生存期方面仍不确定。本网络荟萃分析旨在确定结肠直肠肝转移患者的最佳辅助治疗策略。方法:我们在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库和中国国家知识基础设施数据库中检索了2026年7月之前可能符合条件的研究。使用R软件估计合并无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:纳入18项研究,包括18篇报道。对于DFS,除辅助肝动脉输注化疗(CT、HAIC)伴静脉CT外,辅助CT及围手术期CT均较手术及辅助HAIC显著改善DFS。所有OS治疗策略之间无统计学差异。辅助HAIC联合静脉CT改善DFS的概率最高(85.01%),其次是围手术期CT(11.75%)和辅助CT (3.17%);然而,辅助HAIC联合静脉CT是改善OS的最佳辅助治疗,概率最高(52.46%),其次是围手术期CT(40.25%)和辅助HAIC(5.25%)。结论:辅助CT可能是改善DFS的最佳方法,而围手术期CT可能是改善OS的最佳方法。然而,研究结果还有待进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书