Jack T Thompson, Maia Megase, Marta Boffito, Mark J Caulfield, Emma F Magavern
{"title":"Metabolomics in Early-Phase Clinical Trials from 2010 to 2025.","authors":"Jack T Thompson, Maia Megase, Marta Boffito, Mark J Caulfield, Emma F Magavern","doi":"10.3390/metabo16100777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Metabolomics has the potential to enhance the definition of medication response phenotypes in early-phase clinical trials, yet global uptake and distribution are not well characterised. This study provides an international assessment of metabolomics integration in registered early-phase clinical trials. <b>Methods</b>: Data were obtained from the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Early-phase trials (phase 0-II) conducted from 2010 to 2025 were analysed, and metabolomics studies were identified using predefined keyword searches across trial records. <b>Results</b>: A total of 183,041 early-phase trials were identified, of which 640 (0.35%) incorporated metabolomics. Uptake has increased modestly over time but remains low overall and is concentrated predominantly in high-income countries. The United Kingdom demonstrated the highest proportional integration (1.3%), while the People's Republic of China (<i>n</i> = 237) and the United States of America (<i>n</i> = 90) contributed the greatest absolute number of trials with metabolomics. Among the included metabolomic studies: 187 (29.2%) were phase 0, 229 (35.8%) were phase I trials, 183 (28.6%) were phase II, and 41 (6.4%) were combined phase I/II studies. Metabolomics was most commonly included as a secondary, rather than primary outcome (49.7% vs. 25.3%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Metabolomics remains underutilised in early-phase clinical trials. Addressing barriers to implementation will be critical to enable broader integration of metabolomics into early-phase clinical trials and to integrate a multi-omic approach to precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":18496,"journal":{"name":"Metabolites","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13707337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolites","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16100777","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Metabolomics has the potential to enhance the definition of medication response phenotypes in early-phase clinical trials, yet global uptake and distribution are not well characterised. This study provides an international assessment of metabolomics integration in registered early-phase clinical trials. Methods: Data were obtained from the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Early-phase trials (phase 0-II) conducted from 2010 to 2025 were analysed, and metabolomics studies were identified using predefined keyword searches across trial records. Results: A total of 183,041 early-phase trials were identified, of which 640 (0.35%) incorporated metabolomics. Uptake has increased modestly over time but remains low overall and is concentrated predominantly in high-income countries. The United Kingdom demonstrated the highest proportional integration (1.3%), while the People's Republic of China (n = 237) and the United States of America (n = 90) contributed the greatest absolute number of trials with metabolomics. Among the included metabolomic studies: 187 (29.2%) were phase 0, 229 (35.8%) were phase I trials, 183 (28.6%) were phase II, and 41 (6.4%) were combined phase I/II studies. Metabolomics was most commonly included as a secondary, rather than primary outcome (49.7% vs. 25.3%). Conclusions: Metabolomics remains underutilised in early-phase clinical trials. Addressing barriers to implementation will be critical to enable broader integration of metabolomics into early-phase clinical trials and to integrate a multi-omic approach to precision medicine.
MetabolitesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1070
审稿时长
17.17 days
期刊介绍:
Metabolites (ISSN 2218-1989) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of metabolism and metabolomics. Metabolites publishes original research articles and review articles in all molecular aspects of metabolism relevant to the fields of metabolomics, metabolic biochemistry, computational and systems biology, biotechnology and medicine, with a particular focus on the biological roles of metabolites and small molecule biomarkers. Metabolites encourages scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on article length. Sufficient experimental details must be provided to enable the results to be accurately reproduced. Electronic material representing additional figures, materials and methods explanation, or supporting results and evidence can be submitted with the main manuscript as supplementary material.