In Vitro Azole Susceptibility of Malassezia globosa Isolates from Healthy Controls, Atopic Dermatitis, and Pityriasis Versicolor Across Anatomical Sites.

IF 4.3 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Yu Yu, Xiaochun Liu, Yuan Zhou, Huan Mei, Weida Liu, Xiaodong She, Xu Yao
{"title":"In Vitro Azole Susceptibility of <i>Malassezia globosa</i> Isolates from Healthy Controls, Atopic Dermatitis, and Pityriasis Versicolor Across Anatomical Sites.","authors":"Yu Yu, Xiaochun Liu, Yuan Zhou, Huan Mei, Weida Liu, Xiaodong She, Xu Yao","doi":"10.3390/jof12100773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Malassezia globosa</i> is a major member of the human skin mycobiota and is associated with several cutaneous disorders, yet it remains unclear whether its in vitro azole susceptibility varies with disease status or anatomical site. We evaluated 55 <i>M. globosa</i> isolates obtained from five healthy controls, five patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), and five patients with pityriasis versicolor (PV). Isolates were collected from the forehead, posterior neck, and antecubital fossa in all participants, with additional lesional isolates from AD and PV. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, and isavuconazole. Fluconazole showed the broadest MIC range (0.5-64 μg/mL), whereas posaconazole and voriconazole showed lower ranges (0.00375-0.5 μg/mL). Mixed-effects analyses of the three shared non-lesional sites detected no significant disease-group, site, or disease-by-site effects for any drug (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). Repeated-measures analyses within AD and PV likewise found no significant overall site effect when lesional skin was included. These exploratory data indicate substantial inter-isolate heterogeneity but no consistent association between <i>M. globosa</i> azole susceptibility and clinical group, anatomical site, or lesional status. Larger standardized and strain-resolved studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15878,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fungi","volume":"12 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13705733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fungi","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12100773","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Malassezia globosa is a major member of the human skin mycobiota and is associated with several cutaneous disorders, yet it remains unclear whether its in vitro azole susceptibility varies with disease status or anatomical site. We evaluated 55 M. globosa isolates obtained from five healthy controls, five patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), and five patients with pityriasis versicolor (PV). Isolates were collected from the forehead, posterior neck, and antecubital fossa in all participants, with additional lesional isolates from AD and PV. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole, and isavuconazole. Fluconazole showed the broadest MIC range (0.5-64 μg/mL), whereas posaconazole and voriconazole showed lower ranges (0.00375-0.5 μg/mL). Mixed-effects analyses of the three shared non-lesional sites detected no significant disease-group, site, or disease-by-site effects for any drug (all p > 0.05). Repeated-measures analyses within AD and PV likewise found no significant overall site effect when lesional skin was included. These exploratory data indicate substantial inter-isolate heterogeneity but no consistent association between M. globosa azole susceptibility and clinical group, anatomical site, or lesional status. Larger standardized and strain-resolved studies are warranted.

健康对照、特应性皮炎和花斑糠疹分离株体外对唑的敏感性
球形马拉色菌是人类皮肤真菌群的主要成员,与几种皮肤疾病有关,但尚不清楚其体外对唑的敏感性是否随疾病状态或解剖部位而变化。我们评估了从5名健康对照、5名特应性皮炎(AD)患者和5名花斑糠疹(PV)患者中分离出的55株球状分枝杆菌。从所有参与者的前额、后颈部和前肘窝收集分离株,另外还有AD和PV的病变分离株。测定了氟康唑、酮康唑、伊曲康唑、泊沙康唑、伏立康唑和异唑康唑的最低抑菌浓度(mic)。氟康唑的MIC范围最宽(0.5 ~ 64 μg/mL),泊沙康唑和伏立康唑的MIC范围较窄(0.00375 ~ 0.5 μg/mL)。对三个共有的非病变部位的混合效应分析未发现任何药物对疾病组、部位或逐个部位的显著影响(均p < 0.05)。AD和PV的重复测量分析同样发现,当病变皮肤包括在内时,没有显著的总体部位效应。这些探索性数据表明,分离株间存在大量异质性,但与临床分组、解剖部位或病变状态之间没有一致的关联。有必要进行更大规模的标准化和菌株解决研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Fungi
Journal of Fungi Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
14.90%
发文量
1151
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fungi (ISSN 2309-608X) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal that provides an advanced forum for studies related to pathogenic fungi, fungal biology, and all other aspects of fungal research. The journal publishes reviews, regular research papers, and communications in quarterly issues. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on paper length. Full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书