Psychocognitive vulnerability and risk of incident ADL disability and mortality across six prospective cohort studies.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ying Zeng, Xin Yang, Shuiying Hua, Li Zhang, Fuzhou Hua, Dehui Liu
{"title":"Psychocognitive vulnerability and risk of incident ADL disability and mortality across six prospective cohort studies.","authors":"Ying Zeng, Xin Yang, Shuiying Hua, Li Zhang, Fuzhou Hua, Dehui Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.122666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Depressive symptoms and lower word-recall performance often co-occur with chronic disease in middle-aged and older adults. We examined their separate and joint associations with subsequent activities of daily living (ADL) disability and mortality across multimorbidity strata.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We pooled harmonised data from CHARLS, ELSA, HRS, KLoSA, MHAS and SHARE. Adults ≥45 years contributed observed person-intervals. Study-wave standardised scores defined none, single-domain or dual-domain vulnerability. Outcomes were incident ADL disability (primary) and all-cause mortality. Modified Poisson models estimated risk ratios (RRs); cohort-stratified Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 257,922 participants (mean age 62.4 years; 55.5% female), 181,551 contributed 512,522 eligible ADL intervals (45,430 events). Complete-case adjusted analyses included 179,248 participants (500,911 intervals; 44,178 ADL events) and 213,268 participants (605,704 mortality windows; 27,782 deaths). ADL RRs versus none were 1.68 (95% CI, 1.65-1.71) for single-domain and 2.19 (2.12-2.27) for dual-domain vulnerability, with 48.7 and 85.3 excess events per 1000 standardised interval observations, respectively. Corresponding summary mortality HRs were 1.56 (95% CI, 1.51-1.60) and 1.79 (1.71-1.86). Interaction-model absolute ADL risk was 27.2% with dual-domain vulnerability and ≥ 3 chronic conditions at the next observed assessment. Four categories distinguished endpoint-specific single-domain associations; joint ADL associations were below multiplicative and additive expectations (interaction ratio 0.756; relative excess risk due to interaction [RERI] -0.240). Mortality hazards were nonproportional.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A simple psychocognitive vulnerability classification was associated with graded risks of ADL disability and mortality across six cohorts. The largest absolute ADL risk increases accompanied multimorbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"122666"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.122666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Depressive symptoms and lower word-recall performance often co-occur with chronic disease in middle-aged and older adults. We examined their separate and joint associations with subsequent activities of daily living (ADL) disability and mortality across multimorbidity strata.

Methods: We pooled harmonised data from CHARLS, ELSA, HRS, KLoSA, MHAS and SHARE. Adults ≥45 years contributed observed person-intervals. Study-wave standardised scores defined none, single-domain or dual-domain vulnerability. Outcomes were incident ADL disability (primary) and all-cause mortality. Modified Poisson models estimated risk ratios (RRs); cohort-stratified Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs).

Results: Among 257,922 participants (mean age 62.4 years; 55.5% female), 181,551 contributed 512,522 eligible ADL intervals (45,430 events). Complete-case adjusted analyses included 179,248 participants (500,911 intervals; 44,178 ADL events) and 213,268 participants (605,704 mortality windows; 27,782 deaths). ADL RRs versus none were 1.68 (95% CI, 1.65-1.71) for single-domain and 2.19 (2.12-2.27) for dual-domain vulnerability, with 48.7 and 85.3 excess events per 1000 standardised interval observations, respectively. Corresponding summary mortality HRs were 1.56 (95% CI, 1.51-1.60) and 1.79 (1.71-1.86). Interaction-model absolute ADL risk was 27.2% with dual-domain vulnerability and ≥ 3 chronic conditions at the next observed assessment. Four categories distinguished endpoint-specific single-domain associations; joint ADL associations were below multiplicative and additive expectations (interaction ratio 0.756; relative excess risk due to interaction [RERI] -0.240). Mortality hazards were nonproportional.

Discussion: A simple psychocognitive vulnerability classification was associated with graded risks of ADL disability and mortality across six cohorts. The largest absolute ADL risk increases accompanied multimorbidity.

六项前瞻性队列研究的心理认知脆弱性、ADL致残和死亡风险
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书