Unexpected Right-Sided Nerve Root Variant During L4-L5 Microdiscectomy and Decompression: A Case Report Highlighting Diagnostic and Intraoperative Challenges.
Abukar Abdi Nor, Abdiweli Mohamed Abdi, Nur Abdullahi Karshe, Dayib Hussein Mohamed, Ayub Omar Adam, Mohamed Ismael Iman, Nor Haji Osman, Osman Mohamed Mohamud, Abdirahman Mohamed Jimale
{"title":"Unexpected Right-Sided Nerve Root Variant During L4-L5 Microdiscectomy and Decompression: A Case Report Highlighting Diagnostic and Intraoperative Challenges.","authors":"Abukar Abdi Nor, Abdiweli Mohamed Abdi, Nur Abdullahi Karshe, Dayib Hussein Mohamed, Ayub Omar Adam, Mohamed Ismael Iman, Nor Haji Osman, Osman Mohamed Mohamud, Abdirahman Mohamed Jimale","doi":"10.2147/IMCRJ.S640726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lumbosacral nerve root variants may complicate anatomical identification and decompression during lumbar spine surgery. We report a 45-year-old woman with progressive lower limb numbness and paresthesia predominantly affecting the right leg, intermittent low back pain, and right-sided radiating pain aggravated by standing and walking. Examination showed preserved motor strength and sensory impairment in a predominantly right L4 distribution. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated an L4-L5 disc bulge with thecal sac indentation, bilateral L5 nerve root abutment, and mild bilateral foraminal narrowing; no nerve root anomaly was reported. During L4-L5 microdiscectomy and decompression, two distinct right-sided neural structures were unexpectedly identified under microscopic visualization and interpreted as suspected duplication of the exiting L4 root. Both structures were preserved during decompression. Retrospective MRI review did not confirm the variant, and intraoperative electrophysiological identification was not feasible. During five months of monthly telephone follow-up, the patient reported improvement in radicular pain, walking tolerance, and sensory symptoms, without reported neurological deterioration. Follow-up neurological examinations and standardized outcome measures were unavailable. This case highlights the importance of recognizing and characterizing unexpected neural anatomy when clinical, imaging, and operative findings do not fully correlate. Definitive anatomical classification and objective postoperative recovery remain uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":14337,"journal":{"name":"International Medical Case Reports Journal","volume":"19 ","pages":"640726"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13702045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Medical Case Reports Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S640726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lumbosacral nerve root variants may complicate anatomical identification and decompression during lumbar spine surgery. We report a 45-year-old woman with progressive lower limb numbness and paresthesia predominantly affecting the right leg, intermittent low back pain, and right-sided radiating pain aggravated by standing and walking. Examination showed preserved motor strength and sensory impairment in a predominantly right L4 distribution. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated an L4-L5 disc bulge with thecal sac indentation, bilateral L5 nerve root abutment, and mild bilateral foraminal narrowing; no nerve root anomaly was reported. During L4-L5 microdiscectomy and decompression, two distinct right-sided neural structures were unexpectedly identified under microscopic visualization and interpreted as suspected duplication of the exiting L4 root. Both structures were preserved during decompression. Retrospective MRI review did not confirm the variant, and intraoperative electrophysiological identification was not feasible. During five months of monthly telephone follow-up, the patient reported improvement in radicular pain, walking tolerance, and sensory symptoms, without reported neurological deterioration. Follow-up neurological examinations and standardized outcome measures were unavailable. This case highlights the importance of recognizing and characterizing unexpected neural anatomy when clinical, imaging, and operative findings do not fully correlate. Definitive anatomical classification and objective postoperative recovery remain uncertain.
期刊介绍:
International Medical Case Reports Journal is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal publishing original case reports from all medical specialties. Submissions should not normally exceed 3,000 words or 4 published pages including figures, diagrams and references. As of 1st April 2019, the International Medical Case Reports Journal will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.