The impact of pre-pregnancy underweight on the risk of perineal and anal sphincter injury in nulliparous women.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Daniel Gabbai, Omri Dominsky, Emmanuel Attali, Itamar Gilboa, Ronen Gold, Asnat Groutz, Yariv Yogev, Yoav Baruch
{"title":"The impact of pre-pregnancy underweight on the risk of perineal and anal sphincter injury in nulliparous women.","authors":"Daniel Gabbai, Omri Dominsky, Emmanuel Attali, Itamar Gilboa, Ronen Gold, Asnat Groutz, Yariv Yogev, Yoav Baruch","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.71399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perineal injury is a common complication of vaginal delivery with maternal consequences. Although the effects of obesity are established, the impact of underweight on perineal and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to determine the association between pre-pregnancy underweight and the risk of non-severe perineal injury (NSPI) and OASI in nulliparous women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single, tertiary medical center including nulliparous women aged 18-45 years with singleton term vaginal deliveries (≥37 weeks) and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> between 2012 and 2024. Women with diabetes were excluded. The cohort was divided into underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and normal BMI groups. The primary outcome was NSPI, and the secondary outcome was OASI. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess independent associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 32 112 women were included, 12.9% of whom were underweight. Underweight women had lower birthweights and lower rates of induction and occiput-posterior presentation (all P < 0.05). NSPI occurred slightly less frequently among underweight women than among women with normal BMI (81.5% vs 84.3%, P < 0.001), whereas OASI was more common (1.1% vs 0.8%, P = 0.033). In the fully adjusted model, underweight BMI was associated with slightly lower odds of NSPI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.905; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.825-0.994) and higher odds of OASI (aOR 1.641; 95% CI 1.179-2.286). Additional factors associated with OASI in the fully adjusted model included higher birthweight per 100 g increment (aOR 1.132; 95% CI 1.096-1.169), occiput-posterior presentation (aOR 2.815; 95% CI 1.806-4.386), prolonged second stage (aOR 1.590; 95% CI 1.158-2.182), and vacuum-assisted delivery (aOR 2.304; 95% CI 1.666-3.187).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-pregnancy underweight was associated with slightly lower odds of NSPI but higher odds of OASI.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.71399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Perineal injury is a common complication of vaginal delivery with maternal consequences. Although the effects of obesity are established, the impact of underweight on perineal and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), remains unclear.

Objective: Our objective was to determine the association between pre-pregnancy underweight and the risk of non-severe perineal injury (NSPI) and OASI in nulliparous women.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single, tertiary medical center including nulliparous women aged 18-45 years with singleton term vaginal deliveries (≥37 weeks) and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2 between 2012 and 2024. Women with diabetes were excluded. The cohort was divided into underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) and normal BMI groups. The primary outcome was NSPI, and the secondary outcome was OASI. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess independent associations.

Results: Overall, 32 112 women were included, 12.9% of whom were underweight. Underweight women had lower birthweights and lower rates of induction and occiput-posterior presentation (all P < 0.05). NSPI occurred slightly less frequently among underweight women than among women with normal BMI (81.5% vs 84.3%, P < 0.001), whereas OASI was more common (1.1% vs 0.8%, P = 0.033). In the fully adjusted model, underweight BMI was associated with slightly lower odds of NSPI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.905; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.825-0.994) and higher odds of OASI (aOR 1.641; 95% CI 1.179-2.286). Additional factors associated with OASI in the fully adjusted model included higher birthweight per 100 g increment (aOR 1.132; 95% CI 1.096-1.169), occiput-posterior presentation (aOR 2.815; 95% CI 1.806-4.386), prolonged second stage (aOR 1.590; 95% CI 1.158-2.182), and vacuum-assisted delivery (aOR 2.304; 95% CI 1.666-3.187).

Conclusion: Pre-pregnancy underweight was associated with slightly lower odds of NSPI but higher odds of OASI.

孕前体重过轻对未产妇女会阴和肛门括约肌损伤风险的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书