Chronic disease count and fall-related characteristics among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study of recurrent falls and fall timing.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2026-10-12 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1882689
Yu Chen, Junliang Zhou, Yuanyuan Cai, Jierong Li
{"title":"Chronic disease count and fall-related characteristics among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study of recurrent falls and fall timing.","authors":"Yu Chen, Junliang Zhou, Yuanyuan Cai, Jierong Li","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2026.1882689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic conditions and falls commonly co-occur in older populations. This study described fall occurrence, recurrent falls, and participant-level fall timing across chronic disease count groups in a single-city community sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey included 610 community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years in Neijiang, Sichuan, China. Self-reported falls during the preceding 12 months were classified by occurrence and frequency; recurrent falls were defined as ≥2 falls. One participant-level fall-timing category was analyzed per faller. Chronic disease count was an unweighted sum of seven disease domains. Crude and minimally adjusted logistic regression described count associations. Disease-specific crude associations, post-LASSO models, and an equal-duration morning-versus-afternoon comparison were exploratory analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 303 participants (49.7%) reported falls and 96 (15.7%) reported recurrent falls. Fall occurrence was non-monotonic across count groups (52.9%, 42.2%, 47.8%, 56.6%, and 68.6% for 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 diseases); corresponding recurrent-fall proportions were 9.6%, 12.9%, 16.5%, 19.7%, and 37.3%. The minimally adjusted OR for recurrent falls in the ≥4 group versus 0 was 4.85 (95% CI 2.06-11.46). The five-category timing distribution did not show clear evidence of an overall difference (Pearson <i>p</i> = 0.195). The morning/non-morning contrast had <i>p</i> = 0.024, and the equal-duration comparison included 203 fallers (108 morning and 95 afternoon; <i>p</i> = 0.011). Disease-specific estimates varied across diseases and outcomes. Post-LASSO findings remained exploratory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fall-related characteristics differed across chronic disease count groups in this Neijiang sample, particularly with respect to recurrent falls. Timing differences depended on the comparison used. These cross-sectional findings are hypothesis-generating and do not establish temporal or causal relationships. Prospective, multicenter studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"1882689"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13696193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1882689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic conditions and falls commonly co-occur in older populations. This study described fall occurrence, recurrent falls, and participant-level fall timing across chronic disease count groups in a single-city community sample.

Methods: This cross-sectional survey included 610 community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years in Neijiang, Sichuan, China. Self-reported falls during the preceding 12 months were classified by occurrence and frequency; recurrent falls were defined as ≥2 falls. One participant-level fall-timing category was analyzed per faller. Chronic disease count was an unweighted sum of seven disease domains. Crude and minimally adjusted logistic regression described count associations. Disease-specific crude associations, post-LASSO models, and an equal-duration morning-versus-afternoon comparison were exploratory analyses.

Results: Overall, 303 participants (49.7%) reported falls and 96 (15.7%) reported recurrent falls. Fall occurrence was non-monotonic across count groups (52.9%, 42.2%, 47.8%, 56.6%, and 68.6% for 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 diseases); corresponding recurrent-fall proportions were 9.6%, 12.9%, 16.5%, 19.7%, and 37.3%. The minimally adjusted OR for recurrent falls in the ≥4 group versus 0 was 4.85 (95% CI 2.06-11.46). The five-category timing distribution did not show clear evidence of an overall difference (Pearson p = 0.195). The morning/non-morning contrast had p = 0.024, and the equal-duration comparison included 203 fallers (108 morning and 95 afternoon; p = 0.011). Disease-specific estimates varied across diseases and outcomes. Post-LASSO findings remained exploratory.

Conclusion: Fall-related characteristics differed across chronic disease count groups in this Neijiang sample, particularly with respect to recurrent falls. Timing differences depended on the comparison used. These cross-sectional findings are hypothesis-generating and do not establish temporal or causal relationships. Prospective, multicenter studies are required.

社区老年人慢性疾病计数和跌倒相关特征:复发性跌倒和跌倒时间的横断面研究
背景:慢性疾病和跌倒通常在老年人群中同时发生。本研究描述了单个城市社区样本中慢性疾病计数组的跌倒发生率、复发性跌倒和参与者水平的跌倒时间。方法:对四川内江610名年龄≥60 岁的社区居民进行横断面调查。在过去的12 个月内,根据发生和频率对自我报告的跌倒进行分类;复发跌倒定义为跌倒≥2次。每个参与者分析了一个参与者水平的跌倒时间类别。慢性疾病计数是七个疾病域的未加权和。粗略和最低限度调整的逻辑回归描述了计数关联。疾病特异性的粗略关联、lasso后模型和等长时间的上午与下午比较是探索性分析。结果:总体而言,303名参与者(49.7%)报告跌倒,96名参与者(15.7%)报告复发性跌倒。各计数组的跌倒发生率非单调性(0、1、2、3和≥4种疾病发生率分别为52.9%、42.2%、47.8%、56.6%和68.6%);相应的复发下降比例分别为9.6%、12.9%、16.5%、19.7%和37.3%。≥4组与0组复发跌倒的最小校正OR为4.85 (95% CI 2.06-11.46)。五类时间分布没有显示明显的总体差异证据(Pearson p = 0.195)。上午/非上午对比p = 0.024,等时间比较包括203名跌倒者(上午108名,下午95名,p = 0.011)。疾病特异性估计因疾病和结果而异。lasso后的发现仍然是探索性的。结论:内江样本中不同慢性疾病计数组的跌倒相关特征不同,尤其是复发性跌倒。时间差异取决于所使用的比较。这些横断面研究结果是假设产生的,不建立时间或因果关系。需要前瞻性的多中心研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书