{"title":"OneBoot GRU: Validation-Locked Polynomial Calibration for Level-Invariant Encrypted Inference.","authors":"Xinxia Song, Zhigang Chen, Liqun Chen","doi":"10.3390/e28101118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Encrypted recurrent inference must preserve both ciphertext depth and the numerical behavior of a feedback model. We develop OneBoot GRU, which couples the validation-locked selection of degree-three Sigmoid and degree-seven Tanh domains with a CKKS GRU cell that refreshes one hidden-state ciphertext after each step. On TwoPatterns, the locked polynomial model completed finite official-test trajectories with 92.431% macro accuracy, versus 98.114% for exact activations, and 0.830% mean domain violations. On SyntheticControl, polynomial and exact macro accuracies were 89.067% and 90.133%. Direct state-error comparisons show that improved domain coverage does not always reduce recurrent error; in a separate exploratory domain extension, screening reduced qualification tail error by 74.1% and 94.6% on ECG200 and ItalyPowerDemand. A parameter profile audited against pinned 128-bit sparse-secret references completed four encrypted recurrent steps, prefix pooling, and the trained head with maximum logit error 2.91 × 10<sup>-6</sup> relative to the plaintext polynomial circuit. In three matched four-step runs, GRU median circuit latency was 226.343 s versus 336.981 s for an implemented polynomial LSTM. Twelve additional distinct 128-step inputs were completed under an intentionally insecure structural profile, with 12/12 prediction agreement against the plaintext polynomial reference. These experiments provide measured calibration, arithmetic-fidelity, and system-cost operating points within their stated parameter and sampling scopes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11694,"journal":{"name":"Entropy","volume":"28 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13703041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entropy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/e28101118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Encrypted recurrent inference must preserve both ciphertext depth and the numerical behavior of a feedback model. We develop OneBoot GRU, which couples the validation-locked selection of degree-three Sigmoid and degree-seven Tanh domains with a CKKS GRU cell that refreshes one hidden-state ciphertext after each step. On TwoPatterns, the locked polynomial model completed finite official-test trajectories with 92.431% macro accuracy, versus 98.114% for exact activations, and 0.830% mean domain violations. On SyntheticControl, polynomial and exact macro accuracies were 89.067% and 90.133%. Direct state-error comparisons show that improved domain coverage does not always reduce recurrent error; in a separate exploratory domain extension, screening reduced qualification tail error by 74.1% and 94.6% on ECG200 and ItalyPowerDemand. A parameter profile audited against pinned 128-bit sparse-secret references completed four encrypted recurrent steps, prefix pooling, and the trained head with maximum logit error 2.91 × 10-6 relative to the plaintext polynomial circuit. In three matched four-step runs, GRU median circuit latency was 226.343 s versus 336.981 s for an implemented polynomial LSTM. Twelve additional distinct 128-step inputs were completed under an intentionally insecure structural profile, with 12/12 prediction agreement against the plaintext polynomial reference. These experiments provide measured calibration, arithmetic-fidelity, and system-cost operating points within their stated parameter and sampling scopes.
期刊介绍:
Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300), an international and interdisciplinary journal of entropy and information studies, publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish as much as possible their theoretical and experimental details. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. If there are computation and the experiment, the details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.