OneBoot GRU: Validation-Locked Polynomial Calibration for Level-Invariant Encrypted Inference.

IF 2.1 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Entropy Pub Date : 2026-10-13 DOI:10.3390/e28101118
Xinxia Song, Zhigang Chen, Liqun Chen
{"title":"OneBoot GRU: Validation-Locked Polynomial Calibration for Level-Invariant Encrypted Inference.","authors":"Xinxia Song, Zhigang Chen, Liqun Chen","doi":"10.3390/e28101118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Encrypted recurrent inference must preserve both ciphertext depth and the numerical behavior of a feedback model. We develop OneBoot GRU, which couples the validation-locked selection of degree-three Sigmoid and degree-seven Tanh domains with a CKKS GRU cell that refreshes one hidden-state ciphertext after each step. On TwoPatterns, the locked polynomial model completed finite official-test trajectories with 92.431% macro accuracy, versus 98.114% for exact activations, and 0.830% mean domain violations. On SyntheticControl, polynomial and exact macro accuracies were 89.067% and 90.133%. Direct state-error comparisons show that improved domain coverage does not always reduce recurrent error; in a separate exploratory domain extension, screening reduced qualification tail error by 74.1% and 94.6% on ECG200 and ItalyPowerDemand. A parameter profile audited against pinned 128-bit sparse-secret references completed four encrypted recurrent steps, prefix pooling, and the trained head with maximum logit error 2.91 × 10<sup>-6</sup> relative to the plaintext polynomial circuit. In three matched four-step runs, GRU median circuit latency was 226.343 s versus 336.981 s for an implemented polynomial LSTM. Twelve additional distinct 128-step inputs were completed under an intentionally insecure structural profile, with 12/12 prediction agreement against the plaintext polynomial reference. These experiments provide measured calibration, arithmetic-fidelity, and system-cost operating points within their stated parameter and sampling scopes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11694,"journal":{"name":"Entropy","volume":"28 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13703041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entropy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/e28101118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Encrypted recurrent inference must preserve both ciphertext depth and the numerical behavior of a feedback model. We develop OneBoot GRU, which couples the validation-locked selection of degree-three Sigmoid and degree-seven Tanh domains with a CKKS GRU cell that refreshes one hidden-state ciphertext after each step. On TwoPatterns, the locked polynomial model completed finite official-test trajectories with 92.431% macro accuracy, versus 98.114% for exact activations, and 0.830% mean domain violations. On SyntheticControl, polynomial and exact macro accuracies were 89.067% and 90.133%. Direct state-error comparisons show that improved domain coverage does not always reduce recurrent error; in a separate exploratory domain extension, screening reduced qualification tail error by 74.1% and 94.6% on ECG200 and ItalyPowerDemand. A parameter profile audited against pinned 128-bit sparse-secret references completed four encrypted recurrent steps, prefix pooling, and the trained head with maximum logit error 2.91 × 10-6 relative to the plaintext polynomial circuit. In three matched four-step runs, GRU median circuit latency was 226.343 s versus 336.981 s for an implemented polynomial LSTM. Twelve additional distinct 128-step inputs were completed under an intentionally insecure structural profile, with 12/12 prediction agreement against the plaintext polynomial reference. These experiments provide measured calibration, arithmetic-fidelity, and system-cost operating points within their stated parameter and sampling scopes.

OneBoot GRU:水平不变加密推理的验证锁定多项式校准。
加密循环推理必须同时保持密文深度和反馈模型的数值行为。我们开发了OneBoot GRU,它将验证锁定的三次Sigmoid和七次Tanh域的选择与CKKS GRU单元相结合,该单元在每一步后刷新一个隐藏状态密文。在twpatterns上,锁定多项式模型完成有限正式测试轨迹的宏观精度为92.431%,而精确激活的精度为98.114%,平均域违规率为0.830%。在SyntheticControl上,多项式和精确宏观精度分别为89.067%和90.133%。直接状态误差比较表明,改进的域覆盖并不总能减少重复错误;在单独的探索性领域扩展中,筛选将ECG200和ItalyPowerDemand的合格尾误差降低了74.1%和94.6%。根据固定的128位稀疏秘密引用审计的参数配置文件完成了四个加密的循环步骤、前缀池和训练头部,相对于明文多项式电路,其最大logit误差为2.91 × 10-6。在三个匹配的四步运行中,GRU的中位电路延迟为226.343秒,而实现多项式LSTM的中位电路延迟为336.981秒。另外12个不同的128步输入是在故意不安全的结构配置文件下完成的,与明文多项式引用的12/12预测一致。这些实验在其规定的参数和采样范围内提供测量校准,算术保真度和系统成本操作点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Entropy
Entropy PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1580
审稿时长
21.05 days
期刊介绍: Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300), an international and interdisciplinary journal of entropy and information studies, publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish as much as possible their theoretical and experimental details. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. If there are computation and the experiment, the details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书