Comparing Quantum and Classical Finite State Generators.

IF 2.1 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Entropy Pub Date : 2026-10-11 DOI:10.3390/e28101109
Prasenjit Deb, Almut Beige, Lewis A Clark
{"title":"Comparing Quantum and Classical Finite State Generators.","authors":"Prasenjit Deb, Almut Beige, Lewis A Clark","doi":"10.3390/e28101109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bell-CHSH-like inequalities have been very successful in benchmarking <i>spatial</i> quantum correlations. However, as this paper illustrates, they are not necessarily sufficient for benchmarking <i>temporal</i> quantum correlations. To illustrate this, we parametrise classical and quantum stochastic finite state generators based on a single bit and a single qubit, respectively, and compare the temporal correlations of their output sequences using a Bell-CHSH-like inequality. We find that for sequential measurements by two observers, classical machines can exceed the Tsirelson bound of 22. To present at least one example in which quantum machines outperform their classical counterparts and maintain correlations for longer, we consider general scrambling operations between consecutive measurements. Our analysis shines new light on the fundamental differences between quantum and classical finite state generators and can potentially be used to identify novel resources for quantum technology applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11694,"journal":{"name":"Entropy","volume":"28 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entropy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/e28101109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bell-CHSH-like inequalities have been very successful in benchmarking spatial quantum correlations. However, as this paper illustrates, they are not necessarily sufficient for benchmarking temporal quantum correlations. To illustrate this, we parametrise classical and quantum stochastic finite state generators based on a single bit and a single qubit, respectively, and compare the temporal correlations of their output sequences using a Bell-CHSH-like inequality. We find that for sequential measurements by two observers, classical machines can exceed the Tsirelson bound of 22. To present at least one example in which quantum machines outperform their classical counterparts and maintain correlations for longer, we consider general scrambling operations between consecutive measurements. Our analysis shines new light on the fundamental differences between quantum and classical finite state generators and can potentially be used to identify novel resources for quantum technology applications.

比较量子和经典有限态发生器。
bell - chsh类不等式在空间量子相关性的基准测试中非常成功。然而,正如本文所说明的,它们并不一定足以对时间量子相关性进行基准测试。为了说明这一点,我们分别基于单个比特和单个量子比特参数化经典和量子随机有限状态生成器,并使用bell - chsh类不等式比较其输出序列的时间相关性。我们发现,对于两个观测者的连续测量,经典机器可以超过22的Tsirelson界。为了展示至少一个量子机器优于经典机器并保持更长时间相关性的例子,我们考虑了连续测量之间的一般置乱操作。我们的分析揭示了量子和经典有限状态发生器之间的根本区别,并有可能用于识别量子技术应用的新资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Entropy
Entropy PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1580
审稿时长
21.05 days
期刊介绍: Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300), an international and interdisciplinary journal of entropy and information studies, publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish as much as possible their theoretical and experimental details. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. If there are computation and the experiment, the details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书