{"title":"Localiser-Based Software-Assisted Patient Positioning in Chest CT: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.","authors":"Xinnan Shen, Li Tao, Wen Li, Youhong Cao, Jianping Liu, Yiting Wang, Meiqi Wang, Zhiwei Zhang","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics16203344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Vertical off-centring in chest CT impairs bowtie-filter beam-hardening correction, degrading noise uniformity and image quality. iCentering derives the patient's geometric centre from a single posteroanterior localiser and automatically adjusts table height. This study aimed to evaluate whether iCentering reduces off-centring distance (OCD) and improves image quality versus manual positioning in chest CT, and to investigate correlations between OCD and noise characteristics. <b>Methods</b>: In this retrospective, single-centre study, 192 propensity score-matched pairs from 423 adults undergoing non-contrast chest CT were analysed. OCD, objective image quality (standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM)), noise distribution ratio (NDR<sub>A-P</sub>), and radiation dose indices were measured. Paired comparisons employed <i>t</i>-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and effect sizes reported. Directionally stratified Spearman correlation and multivariable regression examined OCD-noise associations. <b>Results</b>: Intra- and inter-observer reliability was good to excellent (ICC 0.87-0.99 for OCD; 0.75-0.97 for most regions of interest). iCentering moved median OCD closer to zero at all levels (Level 1: -7.25 vs. -29.40 mm; Level 2: -1.45 vs. -22.00 mm; Level 3: 7.45 vs. -11.90 mm; all <i>p</i> < 0.001; r range: 0.76-0.77). Regarding image quality, SD decreased and SNR, CNR, and FOM increased at all levels (all <i>p</i> < 0.001), while NDR<sub>A-P</sub> approached 1.00 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Radiation dose indices were unchanged (<i>p</i> > 0.05). OCD correlated with SD (|<i>ρ</i>| = 0.478-0.812, <i>p</i> < 0.001); regression confirmed independent associations in both strata (OCD < 0: β range: -0.068 to -0.079, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.52-0.65; OCD > 0: β range: 0.056-0.078, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.28-0.54), whereas the association between OCD and NDR<sub>A-P</sub> was weak. <b>Conclusions</b>: iCentering improves centring accuracy and objective image quality in chest CT, without increasing radiation exposure. Reduced OCD is independently associated with lower image noise, underscoring the value of precise centring.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"16 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13703679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16203344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Vertical off-centring in chest CT impairs bowtie-filter beam-hardening correction, degrading noise uniformity and image quality. iCentering derives the patient's geometric centre from a single posteroanterior localiser and automatically adjusts table height. This study aimed to evaluate whether iCentering reduces off-centring distance (OCD) and improves image quality versus manual positioning in chest CT, and to investigate correlations between OCD and noise characteristics. Methods: In this retrospective, single-centre study, 192 propensity score-matched pairs from 423 adults undergoing non-contrast chest CT were analysed. OCD, objective image quality (standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM)), noise distribution ratio (NDRA-P), and radiation dose indices were measured. Paired comparisons employed t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and effect sizes reported. Directionally stratified Spearman correlation and multivariable regression examined OCD-noise associations. Results: Intra- and inter-observer reliability was good to excellent (ICC 0.87-0.99 for OCD; 0.75-0.97 for most regions of interest). iCentering moved median OCD closer to zero at all levels (Level 1: -7.25 vs. -29.40 mm; Level 2: -1.45 vs. -22.00 mm; Level 3: 7.45 vs. -11.90 mm; all p < 0.001; r range: 0.76-0.77). Regarding image quality, SD decreased and SNR, CNR, and FOM increased at all levels (all p < 0.001), while NDRA-P approached 1.00 (p < 0.05). Radiation dose indices were unchanged (p > 0.05). OCD correlated with SD (|ρ| = 0.478-0.812, p < 0.001); regression confirmed independent associations in both strata (OCD < 0: β range: -0.068 to -0.079, R2 = 0.52-0.65; OCD > 0: β range: 0.056-0.078, R2 = 0.28-0.54), whereas the association between OCD and NDRA-P was weak. Conclusions: iCentering improves centring accuracy and objective image quality in chest CT, without increasing radiation exposure. Reduced OCD is independently associated with lower image noise, underscoring the value of precise centring.
DiagnosticsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍:
Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.