Localiser-Based Software-Assisted Patient Positioning in Chest CT: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Xinnan Shen, Li Tao, Wen Li, Youhong Cao, Jianping Liu, Yiting Wang, Meiqi Wang, Zhiwei Zhang
{"title":"Localiser-Based Software-Assisted Patient Positioning in Chest CT: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.","authors":"Xinnan Shen, Li Tao, Wen Li, Youhong Cao, Jianping Liu, Yiting Wang, Meiqi Wang, Zhiwei Zhang","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics16203344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Vertical off-centring in chest CT impairs bowtie-filter beam-hardening correction, degrading noise uniformity and image quality. iCentering derives the patient's geometric centre from a single posteroanterior localiser and automatically adjusts table height. This study aimed to evaluate whether iCentering reduces off-centring distance (OCD) and improves image quality versus manual positioning in chest CT, and to investigate correlations between OCD and noise characteristics. <b>Methods</b>: In this retrospective, single-centre study, 192 propensity score-matched pairs from 423 adults undergoing non-contrast chest CT were analysed. OCD, objective image quality (standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM)), noise distribution ratio (NDR<sub>A-P</sub>), and radiation dose indices were measured. Paired comparisons employed <i>t</i>-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and effect sizes reported. Directionally stratified Spearman correlation and multivariable regression examined OCD-noise associations. <b>Results</b>: Intra- and inter-observer reliability was good to excellent (ICC 0.87-0.99 for OCD; 0.75-0.97 for most regions of interest). iCentering moved median OCD closer to zero at all levels (Level 1: -7.25 vs. -29.40 mm; Level 2: -1.45 vs. -22.00 mm; Level 3: 7.45 vs. -11.90 mm; all <i>p</i> < 0.001; r range: 0.76-0.77). Regarding image quality, SD decreased and SNR, CNR, and FOM increased at all levels (all <i>p</i> < 0.001), while NDR<sub>A-P</sub> approached 1.00 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Radiation dose indices were unchanged (<i>p</i> > 0.05). OCD correlated with SD (|<i>ρ</i>| = 0.478-0.812, <i>p</i> < 0.001); regression confirmed independent associations in both strata (OCD < 0: β range: -0.068 to -0.079, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.52-0.65; OCD > 0: β range: 0.056-0.078, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.28-0.54), whereas the association between OCD and NDR<sub>A-P</sub> was weak. <b>Conclusions</b>: iCentering improves centring accuracy and objective image quality in chest CT, without increasing radiation exposure. Reduced OCD is independently associated with lower image noise, underscoring the value of precise centring.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"16 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13703679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16203344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Vertical off-centring in chest CT impairs bowtie-filter beam-hardening correction, degrading noise uniformity and image quality. iCentering derives the patient's geometric centre from a single posteroanterior localiser and automatically adjusts table height. This study aimed to evaluate whether iCentering reduces off-centring distance (OCD) and improves image quality versus manual positioning in chest CT, and to investigate correlations between OCD and noise characteristics. Methods: In this retrospective, single-centre study, 192 propensity score-matched pairs from 423 adults undergoing non-contrast chest CT were analysed. OCD, objective image quality (standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM)), noise distribution ratio (NDRA-P), and radiation dose indices were measured. Paired comparisons employed t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and effect sizes reported. Directionally stratified Spearman correlation and multivariable regression examined OCD-noise associations. Results: Intra- and inter-observer reliability was good to excellent (ICC 0.87-0.99 for OCD; 0.75-0.97 for most regions of interest). iCentering moved median OCD closer to zero at all levels (Level 1: -7.25 vs. -29.40 mm; Level 2: -1.45 vs. -22.00 mm; Level 3: 7.45 vs. -11.90 mm; all p < 0.001; r range: 0.76-0.77). Regarding image quality, SD decreased and SNR, CNR, and FOM increased at all levels (all p < 0.001), while NDRA-P approached 1.00 (p < 0.05). Radiation dose indices were unchanged (p > 0.05). OCD correlated with SD (|ρ| = 0.478-0.812, p < 0.001); regression confirmed independent associations in both strata (OCD < 0: β range: -0.068 to -0.079, R2 = 0.52-0.65; OCD > 0: β range: 0.056-0.078, R2 = 0.28-0.54), whereas the association between OCD and NDRA-P was weak. Conclusions: iCentering improves centring accuracy and objective image quality in chest CT, without increasing radiation exposure. Reduced OCD is independently associated with lower image noise, underscoring the value of precise centring.

基于定位器的软件辅助胸部CT患者定位:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
背景/目的:胸部CT的垂直偏离会损害弓形滤波器波束硬化校正,降低噪声均匀性和图像质量。icenter从单个后前定位器中获得患者的几何中心,并自动调整桌面高度。本研究旨在评估icenter与手动定位相比,是否能减少偏离中心距离(OCD),提高胸部CT图像质量,并探讨OCD与噪声特性之间的相关性。方法:在这项回顾性的单中心研究中,分析了来自423名接受非对比胸部CT检查的成年人的192对倾向评分匹配对。测量OCD、客观图像质量(标准差(SD)、信噪比(SNR)、噪比(CNR)、优值比(FOM)、噪声分布比(NDRA-P)、辐射剂量等指标。配对比较采用t检验或Wilcoxon符号秩检验,95%置信区间(ci)和效应量报告。方向分层Spearman相关和多变量回归检验了强迫症与噪音的关系。结果:观察者内部和观察者之间的信度从好的到好的(OCD的ICC为0.87-0.99;大多数感兴趣区域的ICC为0.75-0.97)。入组使强迫症中位数在所有水平上更接近于零(水平1:-7.25 vs. -29.40 mm;水平2:-1.45 vs. -22.00 mm;水平3:7.45 vs. -11.90 mm;所有p < 0.001; r范围:0.76-0.77)。在图像质量方面,各水平的SD降低,SNR、CNR、FOM升高(均p < 0.001), NDRA-P接近1.00 (p < 0.05)。辐射剂量指标无明显差异(p < 0.05)。OCD与SD相关(|ρ| = 0.478 ~ 0.812, p < 0.001);OCD < 0: β范围:-0.068 ~ -0.079,R2 = 0.52 ~ 0.65; OCD < 0: β范围:0.056 ~ 0.078,R2 = 0.28 ~ 0.54),而OCD与NDRA-P的相关性较弱。结论:在不增加辐射暴露的情况下,入路可提高胸部CT定心精度和客观图像质量。减少的OCD与较低的图像噪声独立相关,强调了精确定心的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书