Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in a Pacemaker-Dependent Child with Syndromic Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Case Report with Prospective 9-Month Follow-Up.

IF 0.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Case Reports in Neurology Pub Date : 2026-08-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1159/crn/abyag011
Redab Al-Ghawanmeh, Hamzeh Al-Momani, Rawan Abed Alrahman, Yahya Badaineh, Dima Alarameen
{"title":"Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in a Pacemaker-Dependent Child with Syndromic Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Case Report with Prospective 9-Month Follow-Up.","authors":"Redab Al-Ghawanmeh, Hamzeh Al-Momani, Rawan Abed Alrahman, Yahya Badaineh, Dima Alarameen","doi":"10.1159/crn/abyag011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is an emerging noninvasive neuromodulation therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). However, evidence regarding its use in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, particularly pacemaker-dependent children, remains extremely limited.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We report a 6-year-old boy with genetically confirmed TAF6-related Alazami-Yuan syndrome, severe developmental impairment, complete atrioventricular block requiring permanent epicardial VVIR pacing, and syndromic DRE refractory to multiple antiseizure medications (ASMs). Auricular taVNS was initiated at the cymba conchae under multidisciplinary supervision using stimulation parameters of 25 Hz, pulse width 250 μs, intensity titrated to tolerance up to 1.7 mA, for 4 h/day. Treatment initiation was performed in the pediatric intensive care unit with continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for 5 days. The patient underwent prospective follow-up over 9 months using caregiver-maintained seizure diaries, serial electroencephalography (EEG), serial electrocardiography, repeated pacemaker interrogation, adverse event surveillance, and Pediatric Quality of Life Family Impact Module (PedsQL-FIM) assessments. No arrhythmias, pacing abnormalities, device malfunction, or clinically significant pacemaker parameter changes were observed during follow-up. A mild transient local skin irritation resolved with conservative care. Seizure burden decreased from 2 to 4 prolonged seizures daily at baseline to approximately two brief generalized tonic seizures weekly, with sustained improvement through month 9. Reduction of ASM burden began only after clinical improvement had already been observed. Follow-up EEGs remained markedly abnormal with only limited interval electrographic change. PedsQL-FIM improved progressively from 10.4 at baseline to 54.9 at month 3, 80.6 at month 7, and 84.0 at month 9.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Auricular taVNS was successfully administered in a pacemaker-dependent child under structured multidisciplinary monitoring without identifiable cardiac or pacemaker-related adverse events during 9 months of follow-up. Although efficacy and safety conclusions cannot be inferred from a single case, this report supports the clinical feasibility of combining noninvasive vagal neuromodulation with permanent cardiac pacing in carefully selected pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9639,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Neurology","volume":"18 1","pages":"580-588"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13688625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/crn/abyag011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is an emerging noninvasive neuromodulation therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). However, evidence regarding its use in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, particularly pacemaker-dependent children, remains extremely limited.

Case presentation: We report a 6-year-old boy with genetically confirmed TAF6-related Alazami-Yuan syndrome, severe developmental impairment, complete atrioventricular block requiring permanent epicardial VVIR pacing, and syndromic DRE refractory to multiple antiseizure medications (ASMs). Auricular taVNS was initiated at the cymba conchae under multidisciplinary supervision using stimulation parameters of 25 Hz, pulse width 250 μs, intensity titrated to tolerance up to 1.7 mA, for 4 h/day. Treatment initiation was performed in the pediatric intensive care unit with continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for 5 days. The patient underwent prospective follow-up over 9 months using caregiver-maintained seizure diaries, serial electroencephalography (EEG), serial electrocardiography, repeated pacemaker interrogation, adverse event surveillance, and Pediatric Quality of Life Family Impact Module (PedsQL-FIM) assessments. No arrhythmias, pacing abnormalities, device malfunction, or clinically significant pacemaker parameter changes were observed during follow-up. A mild transient local skin irritation resolved with conservative care. Seizure burden decreased from 2 to 4 prolonged seizures daily at baseline to approximately two brief generalized tonic seizures weekly, with sustained improvement through month 9. Reduction of ASM burden began only after clinical improvement had already been observed. Follow-up EEGs remained markedly abnormal with only limited interval electrographic change. PedsQL-FIM improved progressively from 10.4 at baseline to 54.9 at month 3, 80.6 at month 7, and 84.0 at month 9.

Conclusion: Auricular taVNS was successfully administered in a pacemaker-dependent child under structured multidisciplinary monitoring without identifiable cardiac or pacemaker-related adverse events during 9 months of follow-up. Although efficacy and safety conclusions cannot be inferred from a single case, this report supports the clinical feasibility of combining noninvasive vagal neuromodulation with permanent cardiac pacing in carefully selected pediatric patients.

经皮耳迷走神经刺激治疗起搏器依赖儿童综合征性耐药癫痫:1例前瞻性9个月随访报告。
简介:经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)是一种新兴的治疗耐药癫痫(DRE)的无创神经调节疗法。然而,关于其在心脏植入式电子装置患者,特别是依赖起搏器的儿童中的应用的证据仍然非常有限。病例介绍:我们报告一名6岁男孩,遗传确诊为taf6相关的Alazami-Yuan综合征,严重发育障碍,完全性房室传导阻滞需要永久性心外膜VVIR起搏,综合征性DRE对多种抗癫痫药物(ASMs)难治性。在多学科监护下,采用刺激参数为25 Hz,脉冲宽度250 μs,强度滴定至耐受强度1.7 mA,持续4 h/d,在钹壳处启动耳穴taVNS。治疗开始在儿科重症监护病房进行,连续心电图监测5天。患者接受了超过9个月的前瞻性随访,使用护理人员维护的癫痫发作日记、连续脑电图(EEG)、连续心电图、重复起搏器询问、不良事件监测和儿童生活质量家庭影响模块(pedsl - fim)评估。随访期间未观察到心律失常、起搏异常、设备故障或临床上显著的起搏器参数改变。轻度暂时性局部皮肤刺激经保守护理解决。发作负担从基线时每天2次至4次长时间发作减少到每周约2次短暂全身性强直性发作,并在第9个月持续改善。只有在观察到临床改善后,ASM负担才开始减轻。随访时脑电图仍明显异常,仅有有限间隔的电图改变。PedsQL-FIM从基线时的10.4逐步改善到第3个月的54.9,第7个月的80.6,第9个月的84.0。结论:在9个月的随访期间,在结构化的多学科监测下,对一名依赖起搏器的儿童成功实施了耳道taVNS,无可识别的心脏或起搏器相关不良事件。虽然不能从单个病例推断出疗效和安全性结论,但本报告支持在精心挑选的儿科患者中,将无创迷走神经调节与永久性心脏起搏相结合的临床可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Case Reports in Neurology
Case Reports in Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: This new peer-reviewed online-only journal publishes original case reports covering the entire spectrum of neurology. Clinicians and researchers are given a tool to disseminate their personal experience to a wider public as well as to review interesting cases encountered by colleagues all over the world. To complement the contributions supplementary material is welcomed. The reports are searchable according to the key words supplied by the authors; it will thus be possible to search across the entire growing collection of case reports with universally used terms, further facilitating the retrieval of specific information. Following the open access principle, the entire contents can be retrieved at no charge, guaranteeing easy access to this valuable source of anecdotal information at all times.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书