Artificial Intelligence for Therapeutic Peptide Discovery and Development.

IF 5.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Biomolecules Pub Date : 2026-10-03 DOI:10.3390/biom16101445
Salvador Ventura
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence for Therapeutic Peptide Discovery and Development.","authors":"Salvador Ventura","doi":"10.3390/biom16101445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic peptides combine biological specificity with chemical versatility, and artificial intelligence (AI) now contributes to their identification, design, and optimisation. Peptide discovery, however, cannot be reduced to generating amino-acid sequences: therapeutic performance also depends on chemistry, conformation, assay context, stability, delivery, safety, manufacturability, and in vivo exposure. This critical review examines AI use across the major peptide classes: receptor agonists, protein-protein interaction inhibitors, oncology and tumour-targeting peptides, antimicrobial and phenotype-driven peptides, delivery peptides, vaccine epitopes, self-assembling materials, and chemically constrained macrocycles. It compares sequence-based, chemical, graph, structure-aware, and multimodal representations across predictive, generative, and experimentally integrated workflows. Coverage spans recent general protein foundation, prediction, and design systems (ProtGPT2, ESM-2/ESM3, ProGen/ProGen2, ProteinMPNN, RFdiffusion, and AlphaFold 3) and peptide-focused methods (RFpeptides, PepFlow, and PepGLAD). Particular attention is given to benchmark integrity, the limits of structure prediction for short and non-canonical molecules, and the gap between retrospective and prospective evidence. To make claims comparable, the review adapts established reporting, validation, and readiness concepts into a peptide-specific, two-dimensional Peptide-AI Evidence Grid that separates methodological rigour (M0-M3) from translational depth (T0-T3), applies it to representative studies, and provides a checklist extending DOME, TRIPOD + AI, and FAIR guidance with the chemistry- and assay-specific items peptide work requires.</p>","PeriodicalId":8943,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13702101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16101445","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapeutic peptides combine biological specificity with chemical versatility, and artificial intelligence (AI) now contributes to their identification, design, and optimisation. Peptide discovery, however, cannot be reduced to generating amino-acid sequences: therapeutic performance also depends on chemistry, conformation, assay context, stability, delivery, safety, manufacturability, and in vivo exposure. This critical review examines AI use across the major peptide classes: receptor agonists, protein-protein interaction inhibitors, oncology and tumour-targeting peptides, antimicrobial and phenotype-driven peptides, delivery peptides, vaccine epitopes, self-assembling materials, and chemically constrained macrocycles. It compares sequence-based, chemical, graph, structure-aware, and multimodal representations across predictive, generative, and experimentally integrated workflows. Coverage spans recent general protein foundation, prediction, and design systems (ProtGPT2, ESM-2/ESM3, ProGen/ProGen2, ProteinMPNN, RFdiffusion, and AlphaFold 3) and peptide-focused methods (RFpeptides, PepFlow, and PepGLAD). Particular attention is given to benchmark integrity, the limits of structure prediction for short and non-canonical molecules, and the gap between retrospective and prospective evidence. To make claims comparable, the review adapts established reporting, validation, and readiness concepts into a peptide-specific, two-dimensional Peptide-AI Evidence Grid that separates methodological rigour (M0-M3) from translational depth (T0-T3), applies it to representative studies, and provides a checklist extending DOME, TRIPOD + AI, and FAIR guidance with the chemistry- and assay-specific items peptide work requires.

人工智能用于治疗肽的发现和开发。
治疗肽结合了生物特异性和化学多功能性,人工智能(AI)现在有助于它们的识别、设计和优化。然而,肽的发现不能简化为产生氨基酸序列:治疗效果还取决于化学、构象、测定环境、稳定性、递送、安全性、可制造性和体内暴露。这篇重要的综述研究了人工智能在主要肽类中的应用:受体激动剂、蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用抑制剂、肿瘤和肿瘤靶向肽、抗菌和表型驱动肽、递送肽、疫苗表位、自组装材料和化学约束的大环。它比较了基于序列的、化学的、图形的、结构感知的和多模态的表示,这些表示跨预测的、生成的和实验集成的工作流。涵盖了最近的一般蛋白质基础,预测和设计系统(ProtGPT2, ESM-2/ESM3, ProGen/ProGen2, ProteinMPNN, rf扩散和AlphaFold 3)和肽聚焦方法(RFpeptides, PepFlow和PepGLAD)。特别关注的是基准完整性,结构预测短和非规范分子的限制,以及回顾性和前瞻性证据之间的差距。为了使声明具有可比性,本综述将已建立的报告、验证和准备度概念调整为肽特异性的二维肽-AI证据网格,将方法学严谨性(M0-M3)与翻译深度(T0-T3)分开,将其应用于代表性研究,并提供扩展DOME、TRIPOD + AI和FAIR指南的清单,其中包含肽工作所需的化学和分析特异性项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomolecules
Biomolecules Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
1640
审稿时长
18.28 days
期刊介绍: Biomolecules (ISSN 2218-273X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focusing on biogenic substances and their biological functions, structures, interactions with other molecules, and their microenvironment as well as biological systems. Biomolecules publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications.  Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书