{"title":"Triaxial Accelerometry Sensor for Respiratory-Effort Phase Landmark Detection During Sleep: A Cross-Modal Weak Supervision Approach.","authors":"Mengshuang Lv, Jianhong Liao, Yunhan Shi, Bowen Zhang, Qiying Zeng, Yanru Li, Demin Han","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering13101205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reliable respiratory phase sensing is important for respiratory-synchronized hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS), but conventional sensing approaches may impose additional burden. This pilot study investigated whether a surface triaxial accelerometry sensor (TAS) could detect thoracic respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) troughs, which were used as operational phase landmarks representing the transition from end expiration to subsequent inspiration, rather than as directly established physiological respiratory onsets. Ten participants underwent synchronized overnight polysomnography and surface TAS recording, providing 5377.3 min of analyzable data and 75,499 automatically generated RIP landmarks. Two complementary Conformer models were trained using Gaussian weak labels and combined using multi-offset dual-conformer fusion. Generalization was evaluated using outer leave-one-subject-out validation, with fusion weights and event thresholds selected from training-side validation data. At a ±1.0 s matching tolerance, the fusion achieved participant-mean precision, recall, and F1 scores of 0.78, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.75-0.85 for the mean F1 score. It outperformed each component model in 9 of 10 participants; however, its F1 gain over otherwise identical single-grid fusion was 0.0036, below the prespecified exploratory advancement margin. These findings provide preliminary evidence that surface TASs can recover an RIP-trough-derived operational phase landmark in unseen same-center participants. Independent multimodal adjudication, external replication, and full-night causal testing are required before clinical or respiratory-synchronized HGNS applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13701435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13101205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reliable respiratory phase sensing is important for respiratory-synchronized hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS), but conventional sensing approaches may impose additional burden. This pilot study investigated whether a surface triaxial accelerometry sensor (TAS) could detect thoracic respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) troughs, which were used as operational phase landmarks representing the transition from end expiration to subsequent inspiration, rather than as directly established physiological respiratory onsets. Ten participants underwent synchronized overnight polysomnography and surface TAS recording, providing 5377.3 min of analyzable data and 75,499 automatically generated RIP landmarks. Two complementary Conformer models were trained using Gaussian weak labels and combined using multi-offset dual-conformer fusion. Generalization was evaluated using outer leave-one-subject-out validation, with fusion weights and event thresholds selected from training-side validation data. At a ±1.0 s matching tolerance, the fusion achieved participant-mean precision, recall, and F1 scores of 0.78, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.75-0.85 for the mean F1 score. It outperformed each component model in 9 of 10 participants; however, its F1 gain over otherwise identical single-grid fusion was 0.0036, below the prespecified exploratory advancement margin. These findings provide preliminary evidence that surface TASs can recover an RIP-trough-derived operational phase landmark in unseen same-center participants. Independent multimodal adjudication, external replication, and full-night causal testing are required before clinical or respiratory-synchronized HGNS applications.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering