Predicting Depressive Symptoms From Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data Using XGBoost–SHAP and Cross-Lagged Model

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jing Jie, Ming Yin, Jiayue Zeng, Songlin Yang
{"title":"Predicting Depressive Symptoms From Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data Using XGBoost–SHAP and Cross-Lagged Model","authors":"Jing Jie,&nbsp;Ming Yin,&nbsp;Jiayue Zeng,&nbsp;Songlin Yang","doi":"10.1155/da/4401725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>University students face significant academic, social, and career-planning challenges. Under such stressors, deficient emotion regulation may increase vulnerability to depressive states, in which persistent symptoms could progress to clinical depression. This study investigates key risk and protective factors for depressive symptoms among university students, including negative life events, neuroticism, and social support. A longitudinal framework was further employed to assess changes in depressive symptoms before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, with the goal of informing early identification and intervention strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The dataset included 18 024 valid responses from baseline assessments. Follow-up assessments conducted 1 year later included 6129 participants. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to quantify the relative importance of specific factors (e.g., negative life events and social support) on depressive symptoms, while a cross-lagged panel model examined longitudinal directional associations between these factors and depressive symptoms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 15.2% among the student sample. Significant correlations were observed between symptom severity and adverse family relationships, childhood trauma, prior suicide attempts, and psychiatric history. Neuroticism and negative life events showed significant positive associations with depressive symptoms, while subjective support and support utilization demonstrated negative associations with symptom severity. Longitudinal analysis revealed an increase in both symptom severity and depression detection rates following the COVID-19 pandemic. The cross-lagged panel model identified neuroticism as a significant positive longitudinal predictor of depressive symptoms, whereas subjective support showed a significant negative longitudinal association with subsequent depressive symptoms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study identifies neuroticism as an important longitudinal risk indicator for depressive symptoms and subjective support as a protective indicator, while negative life events showed significant cross-sectional associations with symptom severity. The findings demonstrate how integrating longitudinal designs with interpretable machine learning elucidates complex mental health dynamics in student populations, providing an evidence-based framework for targeted interventions within campus mental health policies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/4401725","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/4401725","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

University students face significant academic, social, and career-planning challenges. Under such stressors, deficient emotion regulation may increase vulnerability to depressive states, in which persistent symptoms could progress to clinical depression. This study investigates key risk and protective factors for depressive symptoms among university students, including negative life events, neuroticism, and social support. A longitudinal framework was further employed to assess changes in depressive symptoms before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, with the goal of informing early identification and intervention strategies.

Methods

The dataset included 18 024 valid responses from baseline assessments. Follow-up assessments conducted 1 year later included 6129 participants. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to quantify the relative importance of specific factors (e.g., negative life events and social support) on depressive symptoms, while a cross-lagged panel model examined longitudinal directional associations between these factors and depressive symptoms.

Results

The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 15.2% among the student sample. Significant correlations were observed between symptom severity and adverse family relationships, childhood trauma, prior suicide attempts, and psychiatric history. Neuroticism and negative life events showed significant positive associations with depressive symptoms, while subjective support and support utilization demonstrated negative associations with symptom severity. Longitudinal analysis revealed an increase in both symptom severity and depression detection rates following the COVID-19 pandemic. The cross-lagged panel model identified neuroticism as a significant positive longitudinal predictor of depressive symptoms, whereas subjective support showed a significant negative longitudinal association with subsequent depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

This study identifies neuroticism as an important longitudinal risk indicator for depressive symptoms and subjective support as a protective indicator, while negative life events showed significant cross-sectional associations with symptom severity. The findings demonstrate how integrating longitudinal designs with interpretable machine learning elucidates complex mental health dynamics in student populations, providing an evidence-based framework for targeted interventions within campus mental health policies.

利用XGBoost-SHAP和交叉滞后模型从横截面和纵向数据预测抑郁症状
大学生面临着重大的学术、社会和职业规划挑战。在这样的压力源下,缺乏情绪调节可能会增加对抑郁状态的脆弱性,在这种状态下,持续的症状可能会发展为临床抑郁症。本研究探讨大学生抑郁症状的主要危险因素和保护因素,包括负面生活事件、神经质和社会支持。进一步采用纵向框架来评估COVID-19大流行前后抑郁症状的变化,目的是为早期识别和干预策略提供信息。方法数据集包括18024份来自基线评估的有效回复。一年后进行的随访评估包括6129名参与者。使用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)的极端梯度增强(XGBoost)模型来量化特定因素(例如负面生活事件和社会支持)对抑郁症状的相对重要性,而交叉滞后面板模型则检查这些因素与抑郁症状之间的纵向关联。结果学生抑郁症状患病率为15.2%。症状严重程度与不良家庭关系、童年创伤、既往自杀企图和精神病史之间存在显著相关。神经质和消极生活事件与抑郁症状呈显著正相关,主观支持和支持利用与症状严重程度呈显著负相关。纵向分析显示,在COVID-19大流行之后,症状严重程度和抑郁症检出率都有所增加。交叉滞后面板模型确定神经质是抑郁症状的显著正纵向预测因子,而主观支持与随后的抑郁症状显示显著负纵向关联。结论神经质是抑郁症状的重要纵向风险指标,主观支持是抑郁症状的重要保护性指标,而消极生活事件与抑郁症状严重程度呈显著的横断面相关性。研究结果表明,纵向设计与可解释的机器学习相结合,阐明了学生群体中复杂的心理健康动态,为校园心理健康政策中的有针对性干预提供了一个基于证据的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书