{"title":"Postoperative Pain Treatment After Pancreatic Surgery: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses and Trial Sequential Analyses","authors":"Caroline D. Lassen, Fatieh Yousef, Eske Kvanner Aasvang, Waqas Farooqui, Sermed Ellebæk Nicolae, Anja Geisler","doi":"10.1002/ejp.70428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Major pancreatic surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain that impairs early mobilisation and recovery. ERAS guidelines for pancreaticoduodenectomy recommend multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, with a strong recommendation for epidural analgesia and continuous wound infiltration as an alternative. Other techniques may be beneficial, but their efficacy and safety remain uncertain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the efficacy and adverse events of different postoperative analgesic modalities for patients undergoing total pancreatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Databases and Data Treatment</h3>\n \n <p>This PROSPERO-registered systematic review (ID CRD420251085003) reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A search for randomised controlled trials was conducted in Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase. Meta-analyses were performed in Review Manger, risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2, trial sequential analyses were performed, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighteen RCTs comprising 1468 patients were included, and 10 meta-analyses were performed. Meta-analyses demonstrated reduced pain scores at rest on postoperative day (POD) two with COX-inhibitors compared with placebo/no intervention. Pain scores were similar when comparing epidural analgesia with less invasive strategies (paravertebral block and wound infiltration) on POD1–POD2, but lower with the less invasive techniques on POD3. Meta-analyses were small, and GRADE recommendations ranged from very low to low.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The available evidence was insufficient to establish the superiority of any single analgesic strategy after major pancreatic surgery. Several analgesic strategies, including COX inhibitors, paravertebral block and continuous wound infiltration, showed promising results. Larger RCTs are needed to provide stronger evidence-based recommendations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\n \n <p>Epidural analgesia has long been considered the gold standard for treatment of postoperative pain after major pancreatic surgery. The present review adds to the field by demonstrating that less invasive strategies as continuous wound infiltration and paravertebral block provide comparable pain scores in the first postoperative days, with a significantly lower score on postoperative day three. This supports positioning less invasive strategies as viable alternatives to epidural analgesia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"30 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.70428","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Major pancreatic surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain that impairs early mobilisation and recovery. ERAS guidelines for pancreaticoduodenectomy recommend multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, with a strong recommendation for epidural analgesia and continuous wound infiltration as an alternative. Other techniques may be beneficial, but their efficacy and safety remain uncertain.
Objective
To investigate the efficacy and adverse events of different postoperative analgesic modalities for patients undergoing total pancreatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy.
Databases and Data Treatment
This PROSPERO-registered systematic review (ID CRD420251085003) reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. A search for randomised controlled trials was conducted in Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase. Meta-analyses were performed in Review Manger, risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2, trial sequential analyses were performed, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE.
Results
Eighteen RCTs comprising 1468 patients were included, and 10 meta-analyses were performed. Meta-analyses demonstrated reduced pain scores at rest on postoperative day (POD) two with COX-inhibitors compared with placebo/no intervention. Pain scores were similar when comparing epidural analgesia with less invasive strategies (paravertebral block and wound infiltration) on POD1–POD2, but lower with the less invasive techniques on POD3. Meta-analyses were small, and GRADE recommendations ranged from very low to low.
Conclusions
The available evidence was insufficient to establish the superiority of any single analgesic strategy after major pancreatic surgery. Several analgesic strategies, including COX inhibitors, paravertebral block and continuous wound infiltration, showed promising results. Larger RCTs are needed to provide stronger evidence-based recommendations.
Significance Statement
Epidural analgesia has long been considered the gold standard for treatment of postoperative pain after major pancreatic surgery. The present review adds to the field by demonstrating that less invasive strategies as continuous wound infiltration and paravertebral block provide comparable pain scores in the first postoperative days, with a significantly lower score on postoperative day three. This supports positioning less invasive strategies as viable alternatives to epidural analgesia.
大胰腺手术与严重的术后疼痛相关,影响早期活动和恢复。胰十二指肠切除术ERAS指南推荐多模式阿片保留镇痛,并强烈推荐硬膜外镇痛和持续伤口浸润作为替代方案。其他技术可能是有益的,但其有效性和安全性仍不确定。目的探讨全胰切除术、胰十二指肠切除术和远端胰切除术患者术后不同镇痛方式的疗效及不良反应。该普洛斯佩罗注册的系统评价(ID CRD420251085003)按照PRISMA指南进行报告。在Medline、Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials和Embase中搜索随机对照试验。在Review manager中进行meta分析,使用RoB 2评估偏倚风险,进行试验序列分析,并使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。结果纳入18项随机对照试验,共1468例患者,进行了10项荟萃分析。荟萃分析显示,与安慰剂/无干预相比,cox -抑制剂可降低术后休息时疼痛评分(POD)。硬膜外镇痛与微创策略(椎旁阻滞和伤口浸润)在POD1-POD2上的疼痛评分相似,但在POD3上的疼痛评分较低。荟萃分析较少,GRADE推荐值从非常低到低不等。结论现有证据不足以证明胰腺大手术后任何单一镇痛策略的优越性。几种镇痛策略,包括COX抑制剂、椎旁阻滞和持续伤口浸润,显示出良好的效果。需要更大规模的随机对照试验来提供更有力的循证建议。硬膜外镇痛一直被认为是治疗胰腺大手术后疼痛的金标准。本综述通过证明微创策略,如持续伤口浸润和椎旁阻滞,在术后第一天提供了相当的疼痛评分,在术后第三天的评分明显较低,从而增加了这一领域。这支持定位微创策略作为硬膜外镇痛的可行替代方案。
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered.
Regular sections in the journal are as follows:
• Editorials and Commentaries
• Position Papers and Guidelines
• Reviews
• Original Articles
• Letters
• Bookshelf
The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis.
Research articles are published under the following subject headings:
• Neurobiology
• Neurology
• Experimental Pharmacology
• Clinical Pharmacology
• Psychology
• Behavioural Therapy
• Epidemiology
• Cancer Pain
• Acute Pain
• Clinical Trials.