Comparative Study of Helical Coil and Bayonet Tube Steam Generator Designs for Molten Salt Reactors

IF 4.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Doh Hyeon Kim, Per F. Peterson, Jin Su Kwon, Jeong Ik Lee
{"title":"Comparative Study of Helical Coil and Bayonet Tube Steam Generator Designs for Molten Salt Reactors","authors":"Doh Hyeon Kim,&nbsp;Per F. Peterson,&nbsp;Jin Su Kwon,&nbsp;Jeong Ik Lee","doi":"10.1155/er/9171906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>High-temperature molten salt heat transfer systems are increasingly important for low-carbon energy technologies because they can couple dispatchable heat sources, thermal energy storage, and efficient power conversion. In molten salt reactors (MSRs), the steam generator (SG) is a key interface between the secondary molten salt loop and the power conversion system. This study presents a comparative thermal–hydraulic assessment of representative helical coil SG (HCSG) and bayonet tube SG (BTSG) concepts using heat exchanger analysis code developed at Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) (KAIST-HXD) version 3, which incorporates nitrate salt thermophysical properties, helical tube heat transfer and pressure drop correlations, and a three-stream nodal formulation for the bayonet configuration. The base framework has experimental support, the HCSG module reproduced published International Reactor Innovative and Secure (IRIS) design point quantities with deviations below 2%, and the integrated BTSG model has not been directly validated under representative molten salt and high-pressure steam conditions. Within the sampled design spaces, the highest feasible volumetric power densities were 35.81 MW/m<sup>3</sup> for the HCSG and 26.97 MW/m<sup>3</sup> for the BTSG. In the representative comparison under matched requirements, the HCSG showed lower pressure drops on the hot and cold sides, whereas the BTSG showed a smaller predicted wall temperature change across the dryout transition and a higher shell side wall temperature near the feedwater inlet. These results indicate a trade-off between compact thermal performance and thermal buffering, while the wall temperature metrics are used only as thermal-hydraulic screening indicators. Sensitivity analyses of feedwater pressure, HCSG tube count, and BTSG pitch-to-diameter ratio (<i>P</i>/<i>D</i>) further clarified the effects of key design variables. The results provide a thermal-hydraulic basis for concept screening and subsequent experimental, material, and structural assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Research","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/9171906","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/9171906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-temperature molten salt heat transfer systems are increasingly important for low-carbon energy technologies because they can couple dispatchable heat sources, thermal energy storage, and efficient power conversion. In molten salt reactors (MSRs), the steam generator (SG) is a key interface between the secondary molten salt loop and the power conversion system. This study presents a comparative thermal–hydraulic assessment of representative helical coil SG (HCSG) and bayonet tube SG (BTSG) concepts using heat exchanger analysis code developed at Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) (KAIST-HXD) version 3, which incorporates nitrate salt thermophysical properties, helical tube heat transfer and pressure drop correlations, and a three-stream nodal formulation for the bayonet configuration. The base framework has experimental support, the HCSG module reproduced published International Reactor Innovative and Secure (IRIS) design point quantities with deviations below 2%, and the integrated BTSG model has not been directly validated under representative molten salt and high-pressure steam conditions. Within the sampled design spaces, the highest feasible volumetric power densities were 35.81 MW/m3 for the HCSG and 26.97 MW/m3 for the BTSG. In the representative comparison under matched requirements, the HCSG showed lower pressure drops on the hot and cold sides, whereas the BTSG showed a smaller predicted wall temperature change across the dryout transition and a higher shell side wall temperature near the feedwater inlet. These results indicate a trade-off between compact thermal performance and thermal buffering, while the wall temperature metrics are used only as thermal-hydraulic screening indicators. Sensitivity analyses of feedwater pressure, HCSG tube count, and BTSG pitch-to-diameter ratio (P/D) further clarified the effects of key design variables. The results provide a thermal-hydraulic basis for concept screening and subsequent experimental, material, and structural assessment.

熔盐堆螺旋盘管与卡口管蒸汽发生器设计的比较研究
高温熔盐传热系统在低碳能源技术中越来越重要,因为它们可以耦合可调度的热源、热能储存和高效的电力转换。在熔盐堆中,蒸汽发生器是连接熔盐二次回路和动力转换系统的关键接口。本研究采用韩国科学技术院(KAIST) (KAIST- hxd)开发的热交换器分析代码第3版,对具有代表性的螺旋盘管SG (HCSG)和卡口管SG (BTSG)概念进行了热水力比较评估,该代码包含硝酸盐热物理特性、螺旋管传热和压降相关性,以及卡口配置的三流节点公式。基础框架有实验支持,HCSG模块复制了国际反应堆创新与安全(IRIS)设计点数量,偏差小于2%,集成BTSG模型未在代表性熔盐和高压蒸汽条件下直接验证。在采样的设计空间内,HCSG的最高可行体积功率密度为35.81 MW/m3, BTSG的最高可行体积功率密度为26.97 MW/m3。在匹配要求下的代表性对比中,HCSG在冷热侧的压降较低,而BTSG在干干过渡期间的预测壁面温度变化较小,在进水口附近的壳侧壁面温度较高。这些结果表明,在紧凑的热性能和热缓冲之间存在权衡,而壁面温度指标仅用作热水力筛选指标。对给水压力、HCSG管数和BTSG节径比(P/D)的敏感性分析进一步阐明了关键设计变量的影响。结果为概念筛选和随后的实验、材料和结构评估提供了热水力基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Energy Research
International Journal of Energy Research 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1170
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Energy Research (IJER) is dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, unique platform for researchers, scientists, engineers, technology developers, planners, and policy makers to present their research results and findings in a compelling manner on novel energy systems and applications. IJER covers the entire spectrum of energy from production to conversion, conservation, management, systems, technologies, etc. We encourage papers submissions aiming at better efficiency, cost improvements, more effective resource use, improved design and analysis, reduced environmental impact, and hence leading to better sustainability. IJER is concerned with the development and exploitation of both advanced traditional and new energy sources, systems, technologies and applications. Interdisciplinary subjects in the area of novel energy systems and applications are also encouraged. High-quality research papers are solicited in, but are not limited to, the following areas with innovative and novel contents: -Biofuels and alternatives -Carbon capturing and storage technologies -Clean coal technologies -Energy conversion, conservation and management -Energy storage -Energy systems -Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation -Hydrogen energy and fuel cells -Hydrogen production technologies -Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies -Nuclear energy -Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass) -Smart energy system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书