School Health Promotion Through UNESCO's Four Pillars of Education and NICE Participation Frameworks: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.5
Oscar Altamirano-Carreón, Teresa Gutierrez-Rosado, Beatriz Olaya Guzmán, María Álvarez Moleiro, Berta Conil Purgimon, Oscar Esparza Del Villar
{"title":"School Health Promotion Through UNESCO's Four Pillars of Education and NICE Participation Frameworks: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Oscar Altamirano-Carreón, Teresa Gutierrez-Rosado, Beatriz Olaya Guzmán, María Álvarez Moleiro, Berta Conil Purgimon, Oscar Esparza Del Villar","doi":"10.1007/s10935-026-00960-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>School health promotion is a central component of Life-Course Health Development (LCHD); however, limited evidence has examined how the governance of intervention processes relates to pedagogical depth. This systematic review aimed to analyze and classify school health promotion programs through a cross-analysis based on UNESCO's Four Pillars of Education and the community participation levels outlined in the NICE NG44 guideline. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and ERIC for studies published between January 2014 and December 2024, yielding 1,643 records. After screening and eligibility assessment, 35 studies were included and evaluated using deductive coding. The findings revealed an uneven descriptive and inferential pattern rather than a balanced alignment between pedagogical depth and participatory intensity. Learning to Be reached transformative levels in 77.1% of the studies, whereas Learning to Know remained predominantly instrumental (51.4%). Participation patterns were mostly directive, with 51.4% of programs classified at low participation levels (\"Inform\" and \"Consult\"), and only 17.1% reaching shared governance levels (\"Collaborate\" and \"Empower\"). Exact inferential testing showed that transformative depth in social and community-oriented learning (Learning to Live Together) was significantly associated with participation intensity (p = .001), whereas no statistically significant associations were observed for Learning to Know, Learning to Do, or Learning to Be (p > .05). To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to cross-analyze pedagogical architectures and power-transfer dynamics in universal school health promotion, offering an evidence-informed roadmap to strengthen collective agency in school health design.</p>","PeriodicalId":73905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prevention (2022)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prevention (2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-026-00960-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

School health promotion is a central component of Life-Course Health Development (LCHD); however, limited evidence has examined how the governance of intervention processes relates to pedagogical depth. This systematic review aimed to analyze and classify school health promotion programs through a cross-analysis based on UNESCO's Four Pillars of Education and the community participation levels outlined in the NICE NG44 guideline. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and ERIC for studies published between January 2014 and December 2024, yielding 1,643 records. After screening and eligibility assessment, 35 studies were included and evaluated using deductive coding. The findings revealed an uneven descriptive and inferential pattern rather than a balanced alignment between pedagogical depth and participatory intensity. Learning to Be reached transformative levels in 77.1% of the studies, whereas Learning to Know remained predominantly instrumental (51.4%). Participation patterns were mostly directive, with 51.4% of programs classified at low participation levels ("Inform" and "Consult"), and only 17.1% reaching shared governance levels ("Collaborate" and "Empower"). Exact inferential testing showed that transformative depth in social and community-oriented learning (Learning to Live Together) was significantly associated with participation intensity (p = .001), whereas no statistically significant associations were observed for Learning to Know, Learning to Do, or Learning to Be (p > .05). To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to cross-analyze pedagogical architectures and power-transfer dynamics in universal school health promotion, offering an evidence-informed roadmap to strengthen collective agency in school health design.

通过教科文组织的四大教育支柱和NICE参与框架促进学校健康:系统审查。
学校健康促进是生命全程健康发展的核心组成部分;然而,有限的证据已经研究了干预过程的治理如何与教学深度相关。本系统审查旨在通过基于联合国教科文组织四大教育支柱和NICE NG44指南中概述的社区参与水平的交叉分析,对学校健康促进计划进行分析和分类。根据PRISMA 2020指南,在MEDLINE、PsycINFO和ERIC中进行了系统检索,检索了2014年1月至2024年12月期间发表的研究,共获得1,643条记录。经过筛选和资格评估,35项研究被纳入并使用演绎编码进行评估。调查结果揭示了不平衡的描述和推理模式,而不是教学深度和参与强度之间的平衡对齐。在77.1%的研究中,“学习成为”达到了变革水平,而“学习了解”仍然主要是工具性的(51.4%)。参与模式主要是指令性的,51.4%的项目被分类为低参与水平(“告知”和“咨询”),只有17.1%的项目达到共享治理水平(“协作”和“授权”)。精确的推理检验表明,社会和社区导向学习(学习共同生活)的变革深度与参与强度显著相关(p = .001),而学习知道、学习做或学习成为没有统计学上显著的关联(p = 0.05)。据我们所知,这是第一次对普遍学校健康促进中的教学架构和权力转移动态进行交叉分析的系统综述,为加强学校健康设计中的集体机构提供了循证路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书