Klemens Gutbrod, Christian Balzer, Dörthe Heinemann, Klaus Willmes, Martina Studer
{"title":"Modality-specific and process-related organization of list-learning performance in principal component and network analyses.","authors":"Klemens Gutbrod, Christian Balzer, Dörthe Heinemann, Klaus Willmes, Martina Studer","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2026.2749516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> List-learning tests provide learning, recall, and recognition indices that are often interpreted as reflecting partly distinct memory processes. We used principal component analysis (PCA) and network analysis (NA) as complementary approaches to examine the organization of verbal and visual-design list-learning performance, with particular attention to very-long-delay memory assessed after approximately 1 week. <b>Method:</b> Data were drawn from two normative cohorts of healthy adults (<i>N</i> = 805). Analyses of the conventional learning, delayed-recall, and recognition measures were based on 800 complete cases, and 233 participants had complete data for analyses including very-long-delay recall and recognition approximately 1 week later. PCA was used to identify dominant dimensions of performance, whereas NA was used to examine relationships among individual measures. <b>Results:</b> PCA yielded two correlated components organized by stimulus modality, accounting for 73.2% of the variance for the conventional learning, delayed-recall, and recognition measures and 70.6% when very-long-delay measures were included. NA likewise showed clear modality-specific organization but additionally differentiated the relationships among learning, recall, and recognition measures, with recall measures occupying comparatively central and recognition measures more peripheral positions. Very-long-delay measures remained embedded within the modality-specific PCA structure but showed a distinctive pattern of relationships in the network. <b>Conclusions:</b> PCA and NA provided complementary descriptions of the same list-learning data. PCA primarily highlighted organization by stimulus modality, whereas NA differentiated relationships among individual learning, recall, and recognition measures. Very-long-delay assessment added information about the organization of memory performance, but the present findings do not establish a separate very-long-delay cognitive process.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2026.2749516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: List-learning tests provide learning, recall, and recognition indices that are often interpreted as reflecting partly distinct memory processes. We used principal component analysis (PCA) and network analysis (NA) as complementary approaches to examine the organization of verbal and visual-design list-learning performance, with particular attention to very-long-delay memory assessed after approximately 1 week. Method: Data were drawn from two normative cohorts of healthy adults (N = 805). Analyses of the conventional learning, delayed-recall, and recognition measures were based on 800 complete cases, and 233 participants had complete data for analyses including very-long-delay recall and recognition approximately 1 week later. PCA was used to identify dominant dimensions of performance, whereas NA was used to examine relationships among individual measures. Results: PCA yielded two correlated components organized by stimulus modality, accounting for 73.2% of the variance for the conventional learning, delayed-recall, and recognition measures and 70.6% when very-long-delay measures were included. NA likewise showed clear modality-specific organization but additionally differentiated the relationships among learning, recall, and recognition measures, with recall measures occupying comparatively central and recognition measures more peripheral positions. Very-long-delay measures remained embedded within the modality-specific PCA structure but showed a distinctive pattern of relationships in the network. Conclusions: PCA and NA provided complementary descriptions of the same list-learning data. PCA primarily highlighted organization by stimulus modality, whereas NA differentiated relationships among individual learning, recall, and recognition measures. Very-long-delay assessment added information about the organization of memory performance, but the present findings do not establish a separate very-long-delay cognitive process.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.