Modality-specific and process-related organization of list-learning performance in principal component and network analyses.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Klemens Gutbrod, Christian Balzer, Dörthe Heinemann, Klaus Willmes, Martina Studer
{"title":"Modality-specific and process-related organization of list-learning performance in principal component and network analyses.","authors":"Klemens Gutbrod, Christian Balzer, Dörthe Heinemann, Klaus Willmes, Martina Studer","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2026.2749516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> List-learning tests provide learning, recall, and recognition indices that are often interpreted as reflecting partly distinct memory processes. We used principal component analysis (PCA) and network analysis (NA) as complementary approaches to examine the organization of verbal and visual-design list-learning performance, with particular attention to very-long-delay memory assessed after approximately 1 week. <b>Method:</b> Data were drawn from two normative cohorts of healthy adults (<i>N</i> = 805). Analyses of the conventional learning, delayed-recall, and recognition measures were based on 800 complete cases, and 233 participants had complete data for analyses including very-long-delay recall and recognition approximately 1 week later. PCA was used to identify dominant dimensions of performance, whereas NA was used to examine relationships among individual measures. <b>Results:</b> PCA yielded two correlated components organized by stimulus modality, accounting for 73.2% of the variance for the conventional learning, delayed-recall, and recognition measures and 70.6% when very-long-delay measures were included. NA likewise showed clear modality-specific organization but additionally differentiated the relationships among learning, recall, and recognition measures, with recall measures occupying comparatively central and recognition measures more peripheral positions. Very-long-delay measures remained embedded within the modality-specific PCA structure but showed a distinctive pattern of relationships in the network. <b>Conclusions:</b> PCA and NA provided complementary descriptions of the same list-learning data. PCA primarily highlighted organization by stimulus modality, whereas NA differentiated relationships among individual learning, recall, and recognition measures. Very-long-delay assessment added information about the organization of memory performance, but the present findings do not establish a separate very-long-delay cognitive process.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2026.2749516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: List-learning tests provide learning, recall, and recognition indices that are often interpreted as reflecting partly distinct memory processes. We used principal component analysis (PCA) and network analysis (NA) as complementary approaches to examine the organization of verbal and visual-design list-learning performance, with particular attention to very-long-delay memory assessed after approximately 1 week. Method: Data were drawn from two normative cohorts of healthy adults (N = 805). Analyses of the conventional learning, delayed-recall, and recognition measures were based on 800 complete cases, and 233 participants had complete data for analyses including very-long-delay recall and recognition approximately 1 week later. PCA was used to identify dominant dimensions of performance, whereas NA was used to examine relationships among individual measures. Results: PCA yielded two correlated components organized by stimulus modality, accounting for 73.2% of the variance for the conventional learning, delayed-recall, and recognition measures and 70.6% when very-long-delay measures were included. NA likewise showed clear modality-specific organization but additionally differentiated the relationships among learning, recall, and recognition measures, with recall measures occupying comparatively central and recognition measures more peripheral positions. Very-long-delay measures remained embedded within the modality-specific PCA structure but showed a distinctive pattern of relationships in the network. Conclusions: PCA and NA provided complementary descriptions of the same list-learning data. PCA primarily highlighted organization by stimulus modality, whereas NA differentiated relationships among individual learning, recall, and recognition measures. Very-long-delay assessment added information about the organization of memory performance, but the present findings do not establish a separate very-long-delay cognitive process.

主成分与网络分析中表学习绩效的模态特定与过程相关组织。
目的:列表学习测试提供学习、回忆和识别指标,这些指标通常被解释为部分反映不同的记忆过程。我们使用主成分分析(PCA)和网络分析(NA)作为补充方法来检查语言和视觉设计列表学习表现的组织,特别关注大约1周后评估的超长延迟记忆。方法:数据来自两个健康成人规范队列(N = 805)。常规学习、延迟回忆和识别测量的分析基于800个完整的案例,其中233个参与者在大约1周后获得了包括超长延迟回忆和识别在内的完整数据。PCA用于确定绩效的主要维度,而NA用于检查各个措施之间的关系。结果:主成分分析得到了两个以刺激方式组织的相关分量,在常规学习、延迟回忆和识别测量中占方差的73.2%,在包括甚长延迟测量时占方差的70.6%。NA同样表现出明确的模式特异性组织,但也区分了学习、回忆和识别措施之间的关系,其中回忆措施占据相对中心的位置,而识别措施则占据更外围的位置。非常长的延迟测量仍然嵌入在模态特定的PCA结构中,但在网络中显示出独特的关系模式。结论:PCA和NA对相同的表学习数据提供了互补的描述。PCA主要强调刺激方式的组织,而NA区分了个体学习、回忆和识别措施之间的关系。超长延迟评估增加了记忆表现组织的信息,但目前的研究结果并没有建立一个单独的超长延迟认知过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书