[Translated article] Comparison of peroneus longus and hamstring autografts in ACL reconstruction: Graft diameter and donor-site morbidity analysis.

Q3 Medicine
M A Abdelmoeti, A M Nahla, A M Elshaer
{"title":"[Translated article] Comparison of peroneus longus and hamstring autografts in ACL reconstruction: Graft diameter and donor-site morbidity analysis.","authors":"M A Abdelmoeti, A M Nahla, A M Elshaer","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2026.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgeons increasingly consider the peroneus longus tendon an effective alternative to hamstring autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Choosing the right graft critically impacts long-term knee stability, prompting surgeons to strictly avoid undersized tissues. This study retrospectively compared clinical outcomes, knee stability, and comprehensive donor-site morbidity in ACLR utilizing peroneus longus versus hamstring tendon autografts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 30 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACLR in this retrospective review. The cohort was divided equally into hamstring tendon group (n=15), initially prepared as 4-strand constructs and augmented to 6 strands when intraoperative sizing fell below 7.5 mm and a peroneus longus graft group (n=15), prepared as 2-strand constructs. One senior surgeon applied the identical surgical technique, fixation method, and postoperative protocol across both groups. We assessed functional outcomes (Lysholm and IKDC scores) at a minimum 2-year follow-up and measured graft diameters intraoperatively. To evaluate donor-site morbidities, we recorded thigh circumference, AOFAS scores, FADI scores, and ankle range of motion (ROM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 30 patients completed at least two years of follow-up (range 24-31 months). Statistically, the two cohorts showed comparable clinical outcomes and overall knee stability (P > 0.05). Initial peroneus longus diameter (mean 8.71 mm) exceeded initial hamstring diameter (mean 7.65 mm) (P<0.001); 6 cases augmented to 6 strands reached a final mean of 8.2 mm. Furthermore, ankle assessments (AOFAS, FADI, and ROM) revealed no joint dysfunction or sports restrictions in the peroneus longus patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peroneus longus patients experienced less anteromedial knee pain and notably less thigh hypotrophy than the hamstring group. Given its larger structural diameter and comparable short-term clinical outcomes, the peroneus longus tendon serves as a robust and viable alternative autograft for ACLR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2026.10.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgeons increasingly consider the peroneus longus tendon an effective alternative to hamstring autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Choosing the right graft critically impacts long-term knee stability, prompting surgeons to strictly avoid undersized tissues. This study retrospectively compared clinical outcomes, knee stability, and comprehensive donor-site morbidity in ACLR utilizing peroneus longus versus hamstring tendon autografts.

Methods: We evaluated 30 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACLR in this retrospective review. The cohort was divided equally into hamstring tendon group (n=15), initially prepared as 4-strand constructs and augmented to 6 strands when intraoperative sizing fell below 7.5 mm and a peroneus longus graft group (n=15), prepared as 2-strand constructs. One senior surgeon applied the identical surgical technique, fixation method, and postoperative protocol across both groups. We assessed functional outcomes (Lysholm and IKDC scores) at a minimum 2-year follow-up and measured graft diameters intraoperatively. To evaluate donor-site morbidities, we recorded thigh circumference, AOFAS scores, FADI scores, and ankle range of motion (ROM).

Results: All 30 patients completed at least two years of follow-up (range 24-31 months). Statistically, the two cohorts showed comparable clinical outcomes and overall knee stability (P > 0.05). Initial peroneus longus diameter (mean 8.71 mm) exceeded initial hamstring diameter (mean 7.65 mm) (P<0.001); 6 cases augmented to 6 strands reached a final mean of 8.2 mm. Furthermore, ankle assessments (AOFAS, FADI, and ROM) revealed no joint dysfunction or sports restrictions in the peroneus longus patients.

Conclusion: Peroneus longus patients experienced less anteromedial knee pain and notably less thigh hypotrophy than the hamstring group. Given its larger structural diameter and comparable short-term clinical outcomes, the peroneus longus tendon serves as a robust and viable alternative autograft for ACLR.

Level of evidence: Level III.

腓骨长肌与腘绳肌自体移植物重建前交叉韧带的比较:移植物直径和供体部位发病率分析。
背景:越来越多的外科医生认为腓骨长肌腱是前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)的有效替代腘绳肌腱自体移植。选择合适的移植物对膝关节的长期稳定性有重要影响,这促使外科医生严格避免使用尺寸过小的组织。本研究回顾性比较了腓长肌与腘绳肌腱自体移植ACLR的临床结果、膝关节稳定性和综合供体部位发病率。方法:对30例关节镜下ACLR患者进行回顾性分析。该队列平均分为腘绳肌腱组(n=15)和腓骨长肌移植组(n=15),前者最初为4股肌腱,术中尺寸小于7.5 mm时增加至6股肌腱;后者为2股肌腱。一名资深外科医生对两组采用相同的手术技术、固定方法和术后方案。我们在至少2年的随访中评估了功能结局(Lysholm和IKDC评分),并在术中测量了移植物直径。为了评估供体部位的发病率,我们记录了大腿围、AOFAS评分、FADI评分和踝关节活动范围(ROM)。结果:所有30例患者均完成了至少2年的随访(24-31个月)。统计学上,两个队列的临床结果和整体膝关节稳定性相当(P < 0.05)。初始腓骨长肌直径(平均8.71 mm)大于初始腘绳肌直径(平均7.65 mm)。结论:与腘绳肌组相比,腓骨长肌组膝关节前内侧疼痛减轻,大腿萎缩明显减轻。考虑到其较大的结构直径和可比较的短期临床结果,腓骨长肌腱作为ACLR强健和可行的替代自体移植物。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书