Edimansyah Abdin, Anitha Jeyagurunathan, Sing Chik Tan, Yee Ming Mok, Swapna Verma, Mengling Feng, Mythily Subramaniam
{"title":"Machine learning-based computerized adaptive testing of PHQ-8 and GAD-7 in psychiatric outpatients.","authors":"Edimansyah Abdin, Anitha Jeyagurunathan, Sing Chik Tan, Yee Ming Mok, Swapna Verma, Mengling Feng, Mythily Subramaniam","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.122660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scalable, accurate and efficient monitoring tools are urgently needed to support psychiatric assessment in routine care. This study aimed to evaluate a machine learning-based computerized adaptive testing (ML-CAT) model for the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 in psychiatric outpatient settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from a longitudinal cohort study of patients with depression or anxiety diagnoses. ML-CAT models were developed using the M5P algorithm. Model performance was evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation. Concurrent validity was assessed with Pearson's r, R<sup>2</sup>, and mean absolute error (MAE). Longitudinal change detection used paired t-tests and Cohen's d. Diagnostic classification agreement (based on ≥10 cutoff between assessments) was examined using percentage agreement and Cohen's κ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ML-CAT administered a median of 2 items per instrument (66-71% item reduction) while achieving near-perfect concurrent validity with full-scale scores (r = 0.996-0.997; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.986-0.991; MAE < 0.62). Both ML-CAT versions reliably detected symptom reductions at 6 months and 1 year. Classification agreement between ML-CAT and full-scale versions was high at 6 months and 1 year for PHQ-8 (κ = 0.85-0.93) and GAD-7 (κ = 0.91-0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ML-CAT model reproduced PHQ-8 and GAD-7 scores with high accuracy and detected meaningful clinical change across two follow-up waves. The resulting adaptive questionnaire can be presented as a flowchart and administered both online and offline, providing real-world clinical evidence for scalable ML-CAT-based psychiatric assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"122660"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.122660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Scalable, accurate and efficient monitoring tools are urgently needed to support psychiatric assessment in routine care. This study aimed to evaluate a machine learning-based computerized adaptive testing (ML-CAT) model for the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 in psychiatric outpatient settings.
Methods: Data were obtained from a longitudinal cohort study of patients with depression or anxiety diagnoses. ML-CAT models were developed using the M5P algorithm. Model performance was evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation. Concurrent validity was assessed with Pearson's r, R2, and mean absolute error (MAE). Longitudinal change detection used paired t-tests and Cohen's d. Diagnostic classification agreement (based on ≥10 cutoff between assessments) was examined using percentage agreement and Cohen's κ.
Results: The ML-CAT administered a median of 2 items per instrument (66-71% item reduction) while achieving near-perfect concurrent validity with full-scale scores (r = 0.996-0.997; R2 = 0.986-0.991; MAE < 0.62). Both ML-CAT versions reliably detected symptom reductions at 6 months and 1 year. Classification agreement between ML-CAT and full-scale versions was high at 6 months and 1 year for PHQ-8 (κ = 0.85-0.93) and GAD-7 (κ = 0.91-0.96).
Conclusions: The ML-CAT model reproduced PHQ-8 and GAD-7 scores with high accuracy and detected meaningful clinical change across two follow-up waves. The resulting adaptive questionnaire can be presented as a flowchart and administered both online and offline, providing real-world clinical evidence for scalable ML-CAT-based psychiatric assessment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.