Machine learning-based computerized adaptive testing of PHQ-8 and GAD-7 in psychiatric outpatients.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Edimansyah Abdin, Anitha Jeyagurunathan, Sing Chik Tan, Yee Ming Mok, Swapna Verma, Mengling Feng, Mythily Subramaniam
{"title":"Machine learning-based computerized adaptive testing of PHQ-8 and GAD-7 in psychiatric outpatients.","authors":"Edimansyah Abdin, Anitha Jeyagurunathan, Sing Chik Tan, Yee Ming Mok, Swapna Verma, Mengling Feng, Mythily Subramaniam","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2026.122660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scalable, accurate and efficient monitoring tools are urgently needed to support psychiatric assessment in routine care. This study aimed to evaluate a machine learning-based computerized adaptive testing (ML-CAT) model for the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 in psychiatric outpatient settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from a longitudinal cohort study of patients with depression or anxiety diagnoses. ML-CAT models were developed using the M5P algorithm. Model performance was evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation. Concurrent validity was assessed with Pearson's r, R<sup>2</sup>, and mean absolute error (MAE). Longitudinal change detection used paired t-tests and Cohen's d. Diagnostic classification agreement (based on ≥10 cutoff between assessments) was examined using percentage agreement and Cohen's κ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ML-CAT administered a median of 2 items per instrument (66-71% item reduction) while achieving near-perfect concurrent validity with full-scale scores (r = 0.996-0.997; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.986-0.991; MAE < 0.62). Both ML-CAT versions reliably detected symptom reductions at 6 months and 1 year. Classification agreement between ML-CAT and full-scale versions was high at 6 months and 1 year for PHQ-8 (κ = 0.85-0.93) and GAD-7 (κ = 0.91-0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ML-CAT model reproduced PHQ-8 and GAD-7 scores with high accuracy and detected meaningful clinical change across two follow-up waves. The resulting adaptive questionnaire can be presented as a flowchart and administered both online and offline, providing real-world clinical evidence for scalable ML-CAT-based psychiatric assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"122660"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.122660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Scalable, accurate and efficient monitoring tools are urgently needed to support psychiatric assessment in routine care. This study aimed to evaluate a machine learning-based computerized adaptive testing (ML-CAT) model for the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 in psychiatric outpatient settings.

Methods: Data were obtained from a longitudinal cohort study of patients with depression or anxiety diagnoses. ML-CAT models were developed using the M5P algorithm. Model performance was evaluated via 10-fold cross-validation. Concurrent validity was assessed with Pearson's r, R2, and mean absolute error (MAE). Longitudinal change detection used paired t-tests and Cohen's d. Diagnostic classification agreement (based on ≥10 cutoff between assessments) was examined using percentage agreement and Cohen's κ.

Results: The ML-CAT administered a median of 2 items per instrument (66-71% item reduction) while achieving near-perfect concurrent validity with full-scale scores (r = 0.996-0.997; R2 = 0.986-0.991; MAE < 0.62). Both ML-CAT versions reliably detected symptom reductions at 6 months and 1 year. Classification agreement between ML-CAT and full-scale versions was high at 6 months and 1 year for PHQ-8 (κ = 0.85-0.93) and GAD-7 (κ = 0.91-0.96).

Conclusions: The ML-CAT model reproduced PHQ-8 and GAD-7 scores with high accuracy and detected meaningful clinical change across two follow-up waves. The resulting adaptive questionnaire can be presented as a flowchart and administered both online and offline, providing real-world clinical evidence for scalable ML-CAT-based psychiatric assessment.

基于机器学习的精神科门诊患者PHQ-8和GAD-7计算机自适应测试。
背景:迫切需要可扩展、准确和高效的监测工具来支持日常护理中的精神病学评估。本研究旨在评估基于机器学习的计算机自适应测试(ML-CAT)模型在精神科门诊环境中的PHQ-8和GAD-7。方法:对诊断为抑郁或焦虑的患者进行纵向队列研究。使用M5P算法建立ML-CAT模型。通过10倍交叉验证评估模型性能。采用Pearson’s r、R2和平均绝对误差(MAE)评估并发效度。纵向变化检测采用配对t检验和Cohen’s d。诊断分类一致性(基于评估之间≥10的截断值)采用百分比一致性和Cohen’s κ检验。结果:ML-CAT每个仪器中位数为2个项目(项目减少66-71%),同时获得近乎完美的全量表并发效度(r = 0.996-0.997;R2 = 0.986-0.991;MAE )结论:ML-CAT模型具有较高的准确性再现PHQ-8和GAD-7评分,并在两个随访波中检测到有意义的临床变化。由此产生的适应性问卷可以以流程图的形式呈现,并在线和离线管理,为可扩展的基于ml - cat的精神病学评估提供现实世界的临床证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书