Wissam Mekary, Neal Bhatia, Faisal M Merchant, Mikhael F El-Chami
{"title":"Transvenous Lead Extraction Without Dedicated Surgical Back up in Low-Risk Patients.","authors":"Wissam Mekary, Neal Bhatia, Faisal M Merchant, Mikhael F El-Chami","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.10.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is associated with major complications that could require immediate surgical rescue. These procedures are performed in an EP lab or hybrid OR with the presence of a surgical team on standby. We have designed an institutional protocol that permits performance of TLE in low-risk situations, in an EP lab without dedicated surgical back-up.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate outcomes of TLE in low-risk patients METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent low-risk TLE at Emory Healthcare between 2010-23. Low-risk TLE were defined as an extraction of a pacing or ICD lead with a dwell time >= 1 and <= 5 years or a lead < 1 year that required extraction tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 482 patients who met the criteria, the average lead age was 2.8 ± 1.2 years. The mean number of targeted leads per patient was 1.6±0.7. Extraction tools were required in 33.1% of cases. Major complications occurred in 0.83% of patients (n=4): 2 pericardial effusions requiring pericardiocentesis, 1 pneumothorax and 1 death from cardiogenic shock in an end stage heart failure patient. The patients with pericardial effusions and pneumothorax were part of a procedure that required lead revisions and the insertion of 1 or more new leads. No patients required surgical rescue.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that, in selected \"low-risk\" patients, TLE can be performed safely in an experienced EP lab at centers with on-site cardiac surgery but without a dedicated surgical standby team, potentially reducing resource utilization in resource-limited healthcare environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.10.042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is associated with major complications that could require immediate surgical rescue. These procedures are performed in an EP lab or hybrid OR with the presence of a surgical team on standby. We have designed an institutional protocol that permits performance of TLE in low-risk situations, in an EP lab without dedicated surgical back-up.
Objectives: To investigate outcomes of TLE in low-risk patients METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent low-risk TLE at Emory Healthcare between 2010-23. Low-risk TLE were defined as an extraction of a pacing or ICD lead with a dwell time >= 1 and <= 5 years or a lead < 1 year that required extraction tools.
Results: Among 482 patients who met the criteria, the average lead age was 2.8 ± 1.2 years. The mean number of targeted leads per patient was 1.6±0.7. Extraction tools were required in 33.1% of cases. Major complications occurred in 0.83% of patients (n=4): 2 pericardial effusions requiring pericardiocentesis, 1 pneumothorax and 1 death from cardiogenic shock in an end stage heart failure patient. The patients with pericardial effusions and pneumothorax were part of a procedure that required lead revisions and the insertion of 1 or more new leads. No patients required surgical rescue.
Conclusion: This study suggests that, in selected "low-risk" patients, TLE can be performed safely in an experienced EP lab at centers with on-site cardiac surgery but without a dedicated surgical standby team, potentially reducing resource utilization in resource-limited healthcare environments.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.