Nevus Counts, Sun Exposure and Phenotypic Characteristics in Invasive Versus In Situ Non-Lentigo Maligna/Non-Acral Lentiginous Melanoma.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Clio Dessinioti, Ruggero Moro, Mihaella Plaka, Ioannis A Stratigos, Celia Requena, Katerina Kypreou, Victor Traves, Irene Stefanaki, Eduardo Nagore
{"title":"Nevus Counts, Sun Exposure and Phenotypic Characteristics in Invasive Versus In Situ Non-Lentigo Maligna/Non-Acral Lentiginous Melanoma.","authors":"Clio Dessinioti, Ruggero Moro, Mihaella Plaka, Ioannis A Stratigos, Celia Requena, Katerina Kypreou, Victor Traves, Irene Stefanaki, Eduardo Nagore","doi":"10.1111/ijd.70737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence on phenotypic features and nevus counts for melanoma in situ (MIS) is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study in patients diagnosed with invasive SSM or MIS, from 1999 to 2025, in melanoma referral centers in Greece and Spain. Our aim was to investigate phenotypic characteristics and nevus counts in non-lentigo maligna/non-acral lentiginous MIS versus invasive superficial spreading melanoma (SSM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 3026 patients (2399 with invasive SSM, 627 with MIS), age did not differ between patients with invasive SSM and those with MIS. In multivariable analysis, patients who reported a history of severe sunburn were less likely to be diagnosed with invasive SSM than with MIS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.64-0.93, p = 0.007). No consistent association was observed with hair, eye color, or phototype between the two groups, both of which had predominantly dark hair and eyes. Compared with patients with few nevi, those with some or many nevi were significantly less likely to be diagnosed with invasive SSM compared to MIS (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62-0.93, and OR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.86, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The similar age at diagnosis of MIS and invasive SSM does not support an obligate progression model. The association of higher nevus counts with MIS suggests that MIS may represent a marker of proneness to melanocytic proliferation or may be preferentially diagnosed in nevus-prone individuals undergoing closer surveillance. Further studies in phenotypically diverse populations are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":13950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.70737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence on phenotypic features and nevus counts for melanoma in situ (MIS) is lacking.

Methods: This is a retrospective study in patients diagnosed with invasive SSM or MIS, from 1999 to 2025, in melanoma referral centers in Greece and Spain. Our aim was to investigate phenotypic characteristics and nevus counts in non-lentigo maligna/non-acral lentiginous MIS versus invasive superficial spreading melanoma (SSM).

Results: In 3026 patients (2399 with invasive SSM, 627 with MIS), age did not differ between patients with invasive SSM and those with MIS. In multivariable analysis, patients who reported a history of severe sunburn were less likely to be diagnosed with invasive SSM than with MIS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.64-0.93, p = 0.007). No consistent association was observed with hair, eye color, or phototype between the two groups, both of which had predominantly dark hair and eyes. Compared with patients with few nevi, those with some or many nevi were significantly less likely to be diagnosed with invasive SSM compared to MIS (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62-0.93, and OR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.86, respectively).

Conclusions: The similar age at diagnosis of MIS and invasive SSM does not support an obligate progression model. The association of higher nevus counts with MIS suggests that MIS may represent a marker of proneness to melanocytic proliferation or may be preferentially diagnosed in nevus-prone individuals undergoing closer surveillance. Further studies in phenotypically diverse populations are warranted.

侵袭性与原位非黄斑性恶性/非肢端黄斑性黑色素瘤的痣计数、日晒和表型特征。
背景:关于原位黑色素瘤(MIS)的表型特征和痣计数的证据尚缺乏。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,从1999年到2025年,在希腊和西班牙的黑色素瘤转诊中心诊断为侵袭性SSM或MIS的患者。我们的目的是研究非黄斑性恶性/非肢端黄斑性MIS与侵袭性浅表扩散黑色素瘤(SSM)的表型特征和痣计数。结果:3026例患者中(侵袭性SSM 2399例,MIS 627例),侵袭性SSM与MIS患者年龄无差异。在多变量分析中,报告有严重晒伤史的患者被诊断为侵袭性SSM的可能性低于MIS(优势比[OR]: 0.77, 95%可信区间[95% CI]: 0.64-0.93, p = 0.007)。没有观察到两组人在头发、眼睛颜色或照片类型上的一致关联,这两组人都主要是深色头发和眼睛。与没有痣的患者相比,有痣或多痣的患者被诊断为侵袭性SSM的可能性明显低于MIS (or: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62-0.93, or: 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.86)。结论:MIS和侵袭性SSM的诊断年龄相近,不支持一定的进展模型。较高的痣计数与MIS的关联表明,MIS可能是黑素细胞增殖倾向的标志,或者可能优先在易患痣的个体中进行更密切的监测。在表型不同的人群中进行进一步的研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
476
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published monthly, the International Journal of Dermatology is specifically designed to provide dermatologists around the world with a regular, up-to-date source of information on all aspects of the diagnosis and management of skin diseases. Accepted articles regularly cover clinical trials; education; morphology; pharmacology and therapeutics; case reports, and reviews. Additional features include tropical medical reports, news, correspondence, proceedings and transactions, and education. The International Journal of Dermatology is guided by a distinguished, international editorial board and emphasizes a global approach to continuing medical education for physicians and other providers of health care with a specific interest in problems relating to the skin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书